No, but that doesn't excuse the limitations that crappy hardware imposes. That's a stupid deflection.Yeah, because hardware is everything that matters?
No, but that doesn't excuse the limitations that crappy hardware imposes. That's a stupid deflection.Yeah, because hardware is everything that matters?
Huh? Why?
The 3DS is a 'failure' in Nintendo's own eyes. When's the last time they hit their sales forecast for the 3DS? Have they ever?
He's comparing the fact that they were/are both cash-rich companies (I guess? I don't know what Blackberry's cash situation is), and using them as an illustration that simply having vast reserves of wealth didn't mean anything for remaining a viable company. And he's right. People keep saying that Nintendo can weather several WiiU-level disasters because of their mountain of money, but that misses the point that they would be burning through their money and not replacing it, and when you factor in the catastrophic effect it would have on their share price and the opportunity cost of all the money they could be making but aren't, they really can't afford to weather a storm that bad. Few companies can.I don't really understand the BlackBerry comparision at all.
The news over the past and current month is not going to get better, unfortunately.
Even I'm starting to lose hope![]()
Any successful company would see as a 'failure' any product that doesn't sell as well as the predecessor.
But I don't see articles on how the ps3 is a failure for not achieving ps2 numbers. Or the doom of the xbox division because of the lack of profits. Or asking sony to drop the vita since it's trailing behind the psp.
No, but that doesn't excuse the limitations that crappy hardware imposes. That's a stupid deflection.
OK then, we agree, Nintendo thinks the 3DS is a failure (so far). Why are people so upset that the author writes the same thing?
Or it could be as they say, an entry level device meant for <7 years old kids, for whom Nintendo doesn't recommend 3D since day one.the 2DS is an admission of failure in that it removed the very namesake and selling point gimmick of the original device
Their sales forecasts were ridiculous though. They were expecting it, and the Wii U, to be successes akin to the DS and Wii
The news over the past and current month is not going to get better, unfortunately.
Even I'm starting to lose hope![]()
Their sales forecasts were ridiculous though. They were expecting it, and the Wii U, to be successes akin to the DS and Wii
It's a reference to a well-known Mark Twain quote, IIRC.
The author does, which is one of the many problems of this article.No one honestly thinks Nintendo is doomed. The WiiU however is doomed.
It would cost too much in both money and consumer confidence for them to discontinue it earlyIm guessing a sales annalyst lost his job back at HQ
I wonder if the WII U tanks to the point that nintendo discontinues it. Will early buyers ever get some kind of compensation?
I think there's a couple of fair points buried in the rubble that is that story. Particularly, I think the 2DS is an admission of failure in that it removed the very namesake and selling point gimmick of the original device. And in fact, it can only be done because Nintendo released a console whose main gimmick was optional, which kneecapped devs from doing anything interesting with it from a gameplay mechanics perspective in the first place. It's the same issue with Off-TV Play on the WiiU; by making that an expected feature for all games among the audience, they've made devs choose between the feature everyone clamors for and making the second screen an integral part of the game.
He's comparing the fact that they were/are both cash-rich companies (I guess? I don't know what Blackberry's cash situation is), and using them as an illustration that simply having vast reserves of wealth didn't mean anything for remaining a viable company. And he's right. People keep saying that Nintendo can weather several WiiU-level disasters because of their mountain of money, but that misses the point that they would be burning through their money and not replacing it, and when you factor in the catastrophic effect it would have on their share price and the opportunity cost of all the money they could be making but aren't, they really can't afford to weather a storm that bad. Few companies can.
You could also compare the two as being complacent in their markets as other competitors innovate and leave them behind, but that's more subjective.
This.You're being stupid.
Nintendo's hardware team work with the software teams to provide them the hardware they want/need.
Look up interviews, they even say that it's when soft devs have done enough with the hardware that they try to push new hardware.
If that was the only thing he said, this article would be less shit.
Im guessing a sales annalyst lost his job back at HQ
I wonder if the WII U tanks to the point that nintendo discontinues it. Will early buyers ever get some kind of compensation?
I'd rather Nintendo's great software teams not be held back by god awful hardware.
That would waste millions and millions. It is the absolute worst thing they could do right now.I agree that the Wii U is a giant turd that needs replaced. They tried to replicate the success of the Wii with another controller gimmick that was aligned with the popularity of the tablet market. It didn't work. The reasons it didn't work have been stated a million times over.
I'm all for them ditching the system and developing something gamers actually want from Nintendo.
Really, you haven't? This sort of second guessing is not unique to Nintendo. It's not some sort of anti-Nintendo conspiracy.Any successful company would see as a 'failure' any product that doesn't sell as well as the predecessor.
But I don't see articles on how the ps3 is a failure for not achieving ps2 numbers. Or the doom of the xbox division because of the lack of profits. Or asking sony to drop the vita since it's trailing behind the psp.
Or it could be as they say, an entry level device meant for <7 years old kids, for whom Nintendo doesn't recommend 3D since day one.
.No one honestly thinks Nintendo is doomed. The WiiU however is doomed.
Im guessing a sales annalyst lost his job back at HQ
I wonder if the WII U tanks to the point that nintendo discontinues it. Will early buyers ever get some kind of compensation?
Under-exaggerated?
Under-exaggerated...
Under.. exaggerated...
jesus christ
Yeah, because hardware is everything that matters?
No one honestly thinks Nintendo is doomed. The WiiU however is doomed.
But all the 2DS really is is an admission that the 3DS is ultimately a failure
They won't discontinue it, it'll just be a short gen. They released the successor to the GBA after a mere 3 years, I can see them doing the same thing with the Wii U considering how poorly it's been doing. They have to put out Kart, Zelda and Smash Bros at least.
No one honestly thinks Nintendo is doomed. The WiiU however is doomed.
SourceI'm not sure who "they" are, but "they" are being incredibly disingenuous.
Reggie Fils-Aime, the president of Nintendo of America, told IGN that the 2DS' target audience is "that first-time handheld gaming consumer." Nintendo recommends that children be at least seven years of age to use the 3DS, so Fils-Aime says that the 2DS creates an opportunity for five- and six-year-olds.
Chû Totoro;80142757 said:Yeah if things keep on going very bad for Wii U we'll have an E3 2015 new system announcement and a launch in 2016 while PS4 and Xbox One will last for 3-4 years more.
Maybe for the better Nintendo should shift its launch cycles and launch in the middle of the two others product's life cycle.
Im guessing a sales annalyst lost his job back at HQ
I wonder if the WII U tanks to the point that nintendo discontinues it. Will early buyers ever get some kind of compensation?
They won't discontinue it, it'll just be a short gen. They released the successor to the GBA after a mere 3 years, I can see them doing the same thing with the Wii U considering how poorly it's been doing. They have to put out Kart, Zelda and Smash Bros at least.
Source of 2DS target / intention
I am assuming you are talking about the GBA sp. The SP was almost exactly the same in hardware. I dont see Nintendo doing that for the wii u.
What can nintendo change about the Wii U in the next revision that will make it a success?
Chû Totoro;80140873 said:This.
People don't understand that Nintendo is a gaming company. And hearing these type of posts I now understand why the gaming industry is not going very well (not yours, the on you quoted).
It's like you'll buy the best TV possible but you only watch bad movies on it (I'm not saying HD or not on purpose). Nintendo may not have the best system but they try to produce the best games possible and it's what matters to me.
PS : and I'm not saying Microsoft or Sony are making "bad movies" but they're want to make spectacular "movies". Nintendo wants to make fun and entertaining "movies".
...I thought that the 3DS was doing well.
Still, the 2DS is a great strategy, and will boost the 3DS numbers for sure.
The WiiU is in a bad spot. With Wind Waker HD, it might get a few more sales going for it, but I don't expect a sudden change anytime soon. :/
I expect them to make Wii U last instead. 3DS affords them to be patient, take the time it needs to get Wii owners upgrade, get new kids in, and have multi console owners PS4/xBox One owners get a Wii U down the road.They won't discontinue it, it'll just be a short gen. They released the successor to the GBA after a mere 3 years, I can see them doing the same thing with the Wii U considering how poorly it's been doing. They have to put out Kart, Zelda and Smash Bros at least.
No one honestly thinks Nintendo is doomed. The WiiU however is doomed.