The proper recourse would have been banning him from the restaurant.
I agree. Unfortunately, he'd already had his meal and chances are not everyone remembered his face. It's not as though it's the norm to check a blacklist before seating a customer.
The proper recourse would have been banning him from the restaurant.
"Surely no one would do that, must be a fake" said the white person
Yeah, except that's not what the person accused said."Surely no one would do that, must be a fake" said the white person
well i mean she released someone's personal signature to the entire internet so, at the very least, that's pretty inappropriate and short-sighted. not defending the person who wrote the comment - it's asinine.
Your signature looks like your print?
that certain word isn't in print but in cursive which is different that the sig itself.
I don't even know why you added that last part, but that kind of stuff will not spark intelligent discussion.
Because, that's the point I wanted to put forth. Some people should stop and examine why it is that their gut reaction is "she faked it, let's examine the handwriting" when a black woman shows evidence of hate speech.
Because, that's the point I wanted to put forth. Some people should stop and examine why it is that their gut reaction is "she faked it, let's examine the handwriting" when a black woman shows evidence of hate speech.
Because, that's the point I wanted to put forth. Some people should stop and examine why it is that their gut reaction is "she faked it, let's examine the handwriting" when a black woman shows evidence of hate speech.
The Red Lobster waitress who said customers left her a receipt with the N-word on it returned to work Thursday ... and got a firm talking to from her bosses.
"They wanted me to sign something that said I understand that I violated company policy by posting the picture," Toni Christina Jenkins, a 19-year-old nursing student, told the Daily News.
Jenkins said she posted it to Facebook expecting it to get a few comments from her friends and did not expect it to go viral.
Toni Christina Jenkins said she never intended to cause the customer harm and did not realize his name was printed on the receipt.
"It wasn't to get back at the gentleman," Jenkins said. "I knew his signature was there, but I didn't know his actual name was printed on the receipt. My intention wasn't to attack the guy."
The Red Lobster waitress was frustrated that people questioned the validity of her claim. Both Jenkins and Barnes said they have gotten threats since the incident made national headlines. Jenkins is far from angry with Barnes now and even said that she would hug him if given the opportunity.
"I can only imagine what he's going through because he's on the other end. I don't wish anything bad against him at all," she said.
Jenkins, who lives with her parents, said that she is working at Red Lobster to save up enough money for a car.
“I don't want anymore drama in my life,” she said. “I just want to go to work, get the money for a car and go to school. ... That's all.”
Red Lobster was not immediately available for comment.
No.Publically Shaming someone is just as bad.
I don't understand why the first impulse in these threads is always to deny <example of racism> is happening. I really don't.
I am sure this has been pointed out, but the handwritings don't match.
Edit: And it looks like different pens were used.
.......And yet not a word from the customer denying he did it.
He's a dick for being a racist, but she can't be posting customers details online. She should be fired. Sorry, she's untrustworthy.
Couple pages back...
How is she untrustworthy exactly. You're making up assumptions about her.
What if she was white. Would she still be untrustworthy?
I think being willing to post personal information about a stranger online is the definition of untrustworthy.How is she untrustworthy exactly. You're making up assumptions about her.
What if she was white. Would she still be untrustworthy?
The handwriting and pen color between the printed words (not the signature) do look very similar and the customer did admit to writing the word "none" on the receipt. That makes me a little suspicious.I am sure this has been pointed out, but the handwritings don't match.
Edit: And it looks like different pens were used.
I think being willing to post personal information about a stranger online is the definition of untrustworthy.
Personally I wouldn't be able to trust someone who would act so irrationally either.It can also just be short sightedness brought on by anger.
Doesn't mean she's a genuinely untrustworthy human being. Also doesn't mean I'm making an excuse for her posting the information online.
The handwriting and pen color between the printed words (not the signature) do look very similar and the customer did admit to writing the word "none" on the receipt. That makes me a little suspicious.
Looks like whatever the case the customer wins this fight.
And I can't see anywhere where it says the girl got fired but wouldn't doubt that's what will happen.
Wait, is that hand written response from the customer legit? If so, it's definitely not his handwriting, which begs the question who wrote it in...
How is she untrustworthy exactly. You're making up assumptions about her.
What if she was white. Would she still be untrustworthy?
Story update:
Red Lobster Waitress Gets $10K Tip After Racist Receipt
http://gma.yahoo.com/blogs/abc-blog...cist-receipt-152557964--abc-news-Recipes.html
Story update:
Red Lobster Waitress Gets $10K Tip After Racist Receipt
http://gma.yahoo.com/blogs/abc-blog...cist-receipt-152557964--abc-news-Recipes.html