Fighting Games Weekly | Sept 16-22 | EVO does a 360 and walks away

Anyone who describes either game as random is an idiot. The only thing random (and technically, it's still not random) in Marvel is shit like Hsien Ko's projectile. Even then, that can be intentionally selected but just not in a practical manner.

This is one of the worst discussions in this thread yet.

People are talking about unpredictability of tournament results, not a literal random number generator built into the game.
 
Anyone who describes either game as random is an idiot. The only thing random (and technically, it's still not random) in Marvel is shit like Hsien Ko's projectile. Even then, that can be intentionally selected but just not in a practical manner.

This is one of the worst discussions in this thread yet.


It was fine until you bitched about it without having a clue of what they're talking about
 
in terms of results.

there isn a random game though its a dumb term tbh

Random is a broad term to describe a fighter, but so is the word "balanced." AE2012 is a static matchup based fighter that requires specialization. It isn't like injustice where you can counterpick sinestro with aquaman straight up and win. What this results is in, as a competing player your success in tournament is tied to how many problematic matchups you run into in tournament. That's why you end up getting things like...Juicebox getting 6-0'd by Justin's rufus in grand finals...because up until that entire point he had avoided Rufus.
 
It was fine until you bitched about it without having a clue of what they're talking about

Saying 'random game' is a vague term. People throw it around plenty, discussing the probability of the game's victor as being random can still apply to the discussion, especially when people have often criticized marvel as being simply 'random'. For the outcome of a game or tournament to be truly random, it would require the game itself to have randomized elements.

And no, the overall discussion is still an incredibly stupid conversation. Results in either game are never random in any sense of the word. When so many decisive factors come in to play to dictate the winner of any match, let alone the entire tournament, random simply does not apply at all so the discussion is dead before it begins.

So use your brain before saying I have no idea what's being discussed.
 
I am not going to count this tournament as a major because the format is stupid and any game subjected to that format would yield stupid results.

I actually like this format... I'm not a fan of double elim. Why would you reward the loser with a second chance? IMO, you'd want round robin pools -> single elim if you want to determine who's best skill-wise. When you think about it, there's not a lot of sports that use double elim. It's not the standard, I'm curious how it became the standard in fighting games other than because of time restraints.
 
Local fighting game tournament today... I let Ranmasama try out my Oculus Rift.

http://youtu.be/47_S2Gi6VNo

He also won Marvel, of course.

Man, OR seems like a real trip - wasn't expecting someone to physically keep Ranmasama from swaying all the way over. Wave of the future.

I actually like this format... I'm not a fan of double elim. Why would you reward the loser with a second chance? IMO, you'd want round robin pools -> single elim if you want to determine who's best skill-wise. When you think about it, there's not a lot of sports that use double elim. It's not the standard, I'm curious how it became the standard in fighting games other than because of time restraints.

I think it's because of time restraints and ease of use - double elimination is less harsh than single elimination, but easier to run and keep track of than round robin.
 
I actually like this format... I'm not a fan of double elim. Why would you reward the loser with a second chance? IMO, you'd want round robin pools -> single elim if you want to determine who's best skill-wise. When you think about it, there's not a lot of sports that use double elim. It's not the standard, I'm curious how it became the standard in fighting games other than because of time restraints.

I like the FT5 quarters onward so if you need to do single elim to achieve it then so be it.

But it's really rough before that due to match ups.
 
I actually like this format... I'm not a fan of double elim. Why would you reward the loser with a second chance? IMO, you'd want round robin pools -> single elim if you want to determine who's best skill-wise. When you think about it, there's not a lot of sports that use double elim. It's not the standard, I'm curious how it became the standard in fighting games other than because of time restraints.
Sets should simply be longer in single elim. Most sports are 2-3 hours long per match. AE/Marvel should be played in Tennis sets IMO. 3 sets of FT7 with a margin of two required to win a set.

Losers bracket exist in other e sports like the MOBA games so its not uncommon. Difference is of course those games are also played over 2 hours where fighting games are played over 15 minutes.
 
I think single elimination sucks. I don't think sports is a good comparison because of time and physical constraints. Football can't do it, to long between games and the physical toll.

Basketball, hockey, baseball do best of 7 most of the time in playoffs and the season is the round robin part.

I don't know soccer that well, but aren't the groupings round robin to get top 2.
 
I think single elimination sucks. I don't think sports is a good comparison because of time and physical constraints. Football can't do it, to long between games and the physical toll.

Basketball, hockey, baseball do best of 7 most of the time in playoffs and the season is the round robin part.

I don't know soccer that well, but aren't the groupings round robin to get top 2.
For soccer it depends on the tournament.

It's Round Robin for group then single elimination for finals. For World Cup its one game go home, for UEFA Champions League its 2 matches (one home and one away, you win with combined score difference) for playoffs and final is one match.
 
For soccer it depends on the tournament.

It's Round Robin for group then single elimination for finals. For World Cup its one game go home, for UEFA Champions League its 2 matches (one home and one away, you win with combined score difference) for playoffs and final is one match.

It would be nice in an unlimited resource future when pools at EVO could be round robin.

Tennis setup would be nice too.
 
So basically Fchamp called SF4 more random because Daigo was taken out by one of the top Japanese Vipers who has made top 32 in at EVO two years in a row.

I don't think Kyabetsu made top 32 this year. I remember he lost early to Dieminion. That was after Dieminion lost early to snake eyez. Bad matchups!
 
It would be nice in an unlimited resource future when pools at EVO could be round robin.

Tennis setup would be nice too.
Well big tournaments have qualifiers beforehand sort of like Canada Cup for the whole year until the big event. Then for the big event they have the long games and just killers. No one wants to see Random Joe play Roger Federer at Wimbledon they want to see Federer vs Nadal or Djokovic vs Murray.

Capcom Cup is a great idea its too bad that they had 2/3 single elimination pools. The finals are going to be 8 players FT5 single elimination for all the marbles.
 
It's not the standard, I'm curious how it became the standard in fighting games other than because of time restraints.

Well, honestly, single elimination 2/3 in fighting games could work only if they were perfectly balanced and there were no bad match ups. Until that, double elimination is the way to go. It's not perfect, but much less worse.
 
Capcom Cup is a great idea its too bad that they had 2/3 single elimination pools. The finals are going to be 8 players FT5 single elimination for all the marbles.

This is what I don't get. They went so far as make top 8 FT5, but pools only 2/3. Should have been at least 3/5 for pools.
 
Top Bottom