Easily avoidable. Don't knowingly, repeatedly and willfully break the ToS.
Even assuming the OP did break the ToS- Doesn't change my argument. One should still have access to the goods they legitimately paid for.
Call me crazy.
Easily avoidable. Don't knowingly, repeatedly and willfully break the ToS.
Guys do I become a detective too if I googled OP's gamertag and post the first thing that comes up
Well, according to the OP (and clearly there is reason to doubt him) he legitimately purchased quite a few games.
With a banned console/account they're gone. That's fucking bullshit, IMO.
Why are people quoting this post with shyamalan memes as if that explains anything? It has nothing to do with XBL whatsoever
Agreed, and it's bullshit. If I paid for something, I should continue to have access to it no matter what.
It's going to be a major issue in the future when media is largely digital content. 'Ownership' is going to have to be redefined.
Aren't you required to give our your password if you're into achievement boosting? The other guys could have done anything when they had access to OP's account.
Agreed, and it's bullshit. If I paid for something, I should continue to have access to it no matter what.
It's going to be a major issue in the future when media is largely digital content. 'Ownership' is going to have to be redefined.
Even assuming the OP did break the ToS- Doesn't change my argument. One should still have access to the goods they legitimately paid for.
Call me crazy.
I'm curious, what was the rewards program fiasco?They don't do ban waves anymore. They do it on a case by case basis now after the rewards program fiasco in 2011.
yes/NoAren't you required to give our your password if you're into achievement boosting? The other guys could have done anything when they had access to OP's account.
I agree, now it's up to him to prove he bought them legally (through Microsoft, not here). This was one of my main concerns with the early ideas they had with the XBox One. If the system requires to be connected to function think of all the issues. There would be a lot of legal issues to be able to access your content if they banned you or they would have to make it so you can still connect online just not join mutiplayer matches (which I think Larry Hyrb mentioned to be the case).
I'm curious, what was the rewards program fiasco?
(Google didn't turn anything up)
I'm curious, what was the rewards program fiasco?
(Google didn't turn anything up)
Agreed, and it's bullshit. If I paid for something, I should continue to have access to it no matter what.
It's going to be a major issue in the future when media is largely digital content. 'Ownership' is going to have to be redefined.
Even assuming the OP did break the ToS- Doesn't change my argument. One should still have access to the goods they legitimately paid for.
Call me crazy.
I'm sorry but maybe you should read the legal disclaimers the next time you create a network ID. You accept the terms before you buy anything. Don't like this fact? Bail out from such platform then.
And they will, so long as they still own the Xbox to which the licenses are assigned.
yes/No
Most the time Boosting is when people gather to ease getting a achievement/trophy.
EG: the trophy is 50 multiplayer wins.
you get a friend and play him 50 times with him intentionally losing
Aren't you required to give our your password if you're into achievement boosting?
I'm curious, what was the rewards program fiasco?
(Google didn't turn anything up)
Here is the key, you don't own anything that you buy digitally. Your purchasing a usage license that can be revoked at any time. There is no more right of first sale or any consumer rights on most digital goods because lawyers have crafted it in the TOS when you "buy" a game your just acquiring an indefinite license that they can revoke at their whim. Microsoft is perfectly within their legal rights to remove your access to any digital good you have purchased at any time for any reason.
Guys do I become a detective too if I googled OP's gamertag and post the first thing that comes up
It may have nothing to do with XBL but it does tell us the type of person he is.
I'm curious, what was the rewards program fiasco?
(Google didn't turn anything up)
Ah, so it's just for multiplayer achievements. I know I've read about people sharing credentials so that a single account could be online at all hours of the day, achievin stuff.
What are you, 6? What makes you think you're entitled to anything? If you paid for a 30-day gym subscription and got banned after 5 days from the place for peeking into the ladies room, do you think they would refund the remaining 25 days or allow you to access the gym still because you paid for it? Fuck no.
So... Don't use Steam/XBL/PSN or basically any service which sells digital content?
Seems like a realistic option to me.
So... Don't use Steam/XBL/PSN or basically any service which sells digital content?
Seems like a realistic option to me.
Console is banned, so no he does not have access to that content.
He does. Play offline. Why should Microsoft, or any company, allow a known thief/exploiter back into their store, digital or otherwise?
I wonder if the TOS differs by country.
Is this a joke post?
What the fuck does this have to do with buying a game and having it taken away from you?
I don't even...
Console is banned, so no he does not have access to that content.
I don't see the problem? You either stand up to your morals and don't support these platforms or you bend over and accept the terms.
What does this have to do with buying car and having that car taken away from because of DUI. You paid for that car so you should be able to use it even though you're breaking the "TOS", right?
Good Job OP is from Europe where European law doesn't recognise EULAs and TOS, even if you have to click "I agree to the terms".
Not that simple. He doesn't have access to download the games that he purchased.
And way to throw around accusations... We have no idea what he was banned for.
What does this have to do with buying car and having that car taken away from because of DUI. You paid for that car so you should be able to use it even though you're breaking the "TOS", right?
If his actions warranted a lifetime ban, why would they allow him to access their store? What business would allow that? But yeah, it's the corporations fault that he broke their well documented rules and they should bend over backwards to accommodate him.
You do get to keep your car
Good Job OP is from Europe where European law doesn't recognise EULAs and TOS, even if you have to click "I agree to the terms".
Good Job OP is from Europe where European law doesn't recognise EULAs and TOS, even if you have to click "I agree to the terms".
Companies, in many cases, still have the right to revoke access to their services in these situations.
You do get to keep your car
Again, completely irrelevant comparison.
YOU still own the car. They can't take it away from you. I can sell it, light it on fire, drive it anyway, or do whatever the fuck I want with it. I purchased it.
This is completely incorrect, no matter how many times it gets repeatedGood Job OP is from Europe where European law doesn't recognise EULAs and TOS, even if you have to click "I agree to the terms".
Banned from live-a, suitable for RGH and offline games.
Everything that goes when you first buy a console. LT3.0 + on it or whatever. In addition I give over 50 sliced (??) ​​games, all worth it surfaced last 2 years + some insane old hits.
In addition, a list of the original.
So
Console - (slim end of 2011, perfect condition, never blocked, never overheated, 320GB HDD)
Cables
Gamepad
The box is in excellent condition, may have some crap on it by Scotch tape.
The console has a shitload of games, LEGAL KUPLJENHI and spent over 500 € ONLY with such nonsense!!!!
Extras tomorrow what else has.