I pirated 360 games and MS banned me, what the hell?

I think this is a fair thing to ask at this point:

Zumblakladla, what activities that you've done associated with you account do you think could have caused the ban?

I think that might be useful for the discussion.
 
Well, according to the OP (and clearly there is reason to doubt him) he legitimately purchased quite a few games.

With a banned console/account they're gone. That's fucking bullshit, IMO.

I agree, now it's up to him to prove he bought them legally (through Microsoft, not here). This was one of my main concerns with the early ideas they had with the XBox One. If the system requires to be connected to function think of all the issues. There would be a lot of legal issues to be able to access your content if they banned you or they would have to make it so you can still connect online just not join mutiplayer matches (which I think Larry Hyrb mentioned to be the case).
 
Aren't you required to give our your password if you're into achievement boosting? The other guys could have done anything when they had access to OP's account.

EDIT: I figured that some boosters share credentials so that a single account could be online at all hours of the day.

Anyway, MS should handle account bans like Valve where you're still able to download and play your existing purchases. But Microsoft.
 
Agreed, and it's bullshit. If I paid for something, I should continue to have access to it no matter what.

It's going to be a major issue in the future when media is largely digital content. 'Ownership' is going to have to be redefined.

I'm sorry but maybe you should read the legal disclaimers the next time you create a network ID. You accept the terms before you buy anything. Don't like this fact? Bail out from such platform then.
 
Agreed, and it's bullshit. If I paid for something, I should continue to have access to it no matter what.

It's going to be a major issue in the future when media is largely digital content. 'Ownership' is going to have to be redefined.

This was the main reason why I rejected the original prospect of the Xbox One, personally: I don't trust Microsoft to be judicious or transparent when it comes to enforcement. In fact, I don't even trust them to be fair.

It took Valve years to earn that trust from me.
 
Even assuming the OP did break the ToS- Doesn't change my argument. One should still have access to the goods they legitimately paid for.

Call me crazy.

He does. Play offline. Why should Microsoft, or any company, allow a known thief/exploiter back into their store, digital or otherwise?
 
Aren't you required to give our your password if you're into achievement boosting? The other guys could have done anything when they had access to OP's account.
yes/No

Most the time Boosting is when people gather to ease getting a achievement/trophy.


EG: the trophy is 50 multiplayer wins.
you get a friend and play him 50 times with him intentionally losing.

The questionable means seems to be a really hard trophy you cant do....say clear lvl50 without dying and you just cant do it. You give friend pw/account info I guess and let him do it.
 
I agree, now it's up to him to prove he bought them legally (through Microsoft, not here). This was one of my main concerns with the early ideas they had with the XBox One. If the system requires to be connected to function think of all the issues. There would be a lot of legal issues to be able to access your content if they banned you or they would have to make it so you can still connect online just not join mutiplayer matches (which I think Larry Hyrb mentioned to be the case).

Well, as a poster previously replied it's merely a license that we're purchasing.

And technically, he/she is right. I guess the seller of this license has the right to revoke it at any time. The whole concept doesn't sit well with me, though.
 
Agreed, and it's bullshit. If I paid for something, I should continue to have access to it no matter what.

It's going to be a major issue in the future when media is largely digital content. 'Ownership' is going to have to be redefined.

What are you, 6? What makes you think you're entitled to anything? If you paid for a 30-day gym subscription and got banned after 5 days from the place for peeking into the ladies room, do you think they would refund the remaining 25 days or allow you to access the gym still because you paid for it? Fuck no.
 
I'm sorry but maybe you should read the legal disclaimers the next time you create a network ID. You accept the terms before you buy anything. Don't like this fact? Bail out from such platform then.

So... Don't use Steam/XBL/PSN or basically any service which sells digital content?

Seems like a realistic option to me.

And they will, so long as they still own the Xbox to which the licenses are assigned.

Console is banned, so no he does not have access to that content.
 
yes/No

Most the time Boosting is when people gather to ease getting a achievement/trophy.


EG: the trophy is 50 multiplayer wins.
you get a friend and play him 50 times with him intentionally losing

Ah, so it's just for multiplayer achievements. I know I've read about people sharing credentials so that a single account could be online at all hours of the day, achievin stuff.
 
Aren't you required to give our your password if you're into achievement boosting?

No? Achievement boosting is just getting people to play with you and help you get achievements. For example lets say you need achievements for a game with basically dead multiplayer. You'd play against your friend on that game and they'd let you kill them for achievements. That's boosting as I understand it.
 
I'm curious, what was the rewards program fiasco?

(Google didn't turn anything up)


If I recall it was when MS accidently quadrupled everyone's MS points


I got banned then, just an account ban though


I also did custom songs on Rock Band, so that could have been why too
 
Here is the key, you don't own anything that you buy digitally. Your purchasing a usage license that can be revoked at any time. There is no more right of first sale or any consumer rights on most digital goods because lawyers have crafted it in the TOS when you "buy" a game your just acquiring an indefinite license that they can revoke at their whim. Microsoft is perfectly within their legal rights to remove your access to any digital good you have purchased at any time for any reason.

Looks like the OP is in Europe, which would mean he owns any game he has bought from XBL.
 
Guys do I become a detective too if I googled OP's gamertag and post the first thing that comes up

WE DID IT GUYS

Quick, search for me. You'll find the martial arts movie I did! I MUST BE A REAL TOUGH CUSTOMER

It may have nothing to do with XBL but it does tell us the type of person he is.

Or it makes him a CAG/frugal gamer...

Also, to people going all 'ToS huhuhuhu' Yeah...that doesn't stand up too well, -especially- if OP is in Europe like some people think. If that's the case, then troubletime
 
Ah, so it's just for multiplayer achievements. I know I've read about people sharing credentials so that a single account could be online at all hours of the day, achievin stuff.

i edited my post for the second example but usually when someones requesting boosting its for the 1st example
 
What are you, 6? What makes you think you're entitled to anything? If you paid for a 30-day gym subscription and got banned after 5 days from the place for peeking into the ladies room, do you think they would refund the remaining 25 days or allow you to access the gym still because you paid for it? Fuck no.

Is this a joke post?

What the fuck does this have to do with buying a game and having it taken away from you?

I don't even...
 
So... Don't use Steam/XBL/PSN or basically any service which sells digital content?

Seems like a realistic option to me.



Console is banned, so no he does not have access to that content.

Yes, he has access to the content on his HD. Play it offline. If you're saying that he should have the right to download games from a store that he exploited or stole from, lol. No business worth a damn is going to allow a thief back into their store just because at one point they paid for something legitimately.
 
He does. Play offline. Why should Microsoft, or any company, allow a known thief/exploiter back into their store, digital or otherwise?

Not that simple. He doesn't have access to download the games that he purchased.

And way to throw around accusations... We have no idea what he was banned for.
 
Is this a joke post?

What the fuck does this have to do with buying a game and having it taken away from you?

I don't even...

What does this have to do with buying car and having that car taken away from because of DUI. You paid for that car so you should be able to use it even though you're breaking the "TOS", right?
 
I don't see the problem? You either stand up to your morals and don't support these platforms or you bend over and accept the terms.

Good Job OP is from Europe where European law doesn't recognise EULAs and TOS, even if you have to click "I agree to the terms".
 
Haha, jesus people. I didn't post that as undeniable proof that he got permed for achievement boosting. I posted it because boosting is frowned upon and seen as cheating by a lot of people regardless of its its against TOS or not.
 
Not that simple. He doesn't have access to download the games that he purchased.

And way to throw around accusations... We have no idea what he was banned for.

If his actions warranted a lifetime ban, why would they allow him to access their store? What business would allow that? But yeah, it's the corporations fault that he broke their well documented rules and they should bend over backwards to accommodate him.
 
What does this have to do with buying car and having that car taken away from because of DUI. You paid for that car so you should be able to use it even though you're breaking the "TOS", right?

Again, completely irrelevant comparison.

YOU still own the car. They can't take it away from you. I can sell it, light it on fire, drive it anyway, or do whatever the fuck I want with it. I purchased it.

If his actions warranted a lifetime ban, why would they allow him to access their store? What business would allow that? But yeah, it's the corporations fault that he broke their well documented rules and they should bend over backwards to accommodate him.

So giving someone access to something they purchased is 'bending over backwards'?

Man, those are some low expectations.
 
You do get to keep your car

And Microsoft is a private entity, they're not the government, they don't make laws.

If someone does something wrong then fine, ban him or her. My problem is removing their access to everything they already bought (and the licensing argument is far from legally settled so you can't just say you lose your license) and that there is no recourse at all. They say they have proof and but don't show it to anyone. That's BS.

And it's not like MS has the moral high ground with their almost impossible to turn off auto renewal, again next to impossible to remove credit card information, them charging expired cards, and other anti-consumer practices.

Anyway, this is all just speculation now and we're arguing about cases where we have next to no information so there's not much point.
 
Good Job OP is from Europe where European law doesn't recognise EULAs and TOS, even if you have to click "I agree to the terms".

That's a massive simplification of the EU's position on EULA's (Which also doesn't extend to ToS / ToU for ongoing services)

Companies, in many cases, still have the right to revoke access to their services in these situations.

Indeed.
 
You do get to keep your car

Ah maybe in the US, but not everywhere. The point still stands and applies to many realities of our society: you may be stripped of a purchase if you don't abide by the rules. And there is one simple way to not having this happen to you: don't do shady piracy cheating shit. OP had it coming to him someday and I have no sympathy.
 
Again, completely irrelevant comparison.

YOU still own the car. They can't take it away from you. I can sell it, light it on fire, drive it anyway, or do whatever the fuck I want with it. I purchased it.

In the UK your car can be seized for breaking the law and driving without insurance and there's not a damned thing you can do about it.
 
Website does not have any connections to this.

Its 2011, this is 2013. What the hell? Don't slide subject to the other side please.

Also, that website was never selling pre-paid cards.
 
I highly doubt that even if you are in Europe where ToS isn't recognized that you can't be held accountable for doing something questionable on a service you signed on the dotted line to use.
 
so, that wahad on a serbian forum is now selling

Banned from live-a, suitable for RGH and offline games.

Everything that goes when you first buy a console. LT3.0 + on it or whatever. In addition I give over 50 sliced (??) ​​games, all worth it surfaced last 2 years + some insane old hits.

In addition, a list of the original.

So

Console - (slim end of 2011, perfect condition, never blocked, never overheated, 320GB HDD)

Cables

Gamepad

The box is in excellent condition, may have some crap on it by Scotch tape.

The console has a shitload of games, LEGAL KUPLJENHI and spent over 500 € ONLY with such nonsense!!!!

Extras tomorrow what else has.

google translation but still...
 
I get digging dirt on OP to explain why he would be banned (as the Oman thing is unlikely).

But short of having "stolen" every game on his account, I can't see what would justify in any way taking his games back.
 
Top Bottom