tokyostomp
Banned
So it's Linux with a Steam skin?
Pretty much this, likely a few integrated features.
So it's Linux with a Steam skin?
Basically, when you are running windows, it's doing a bunch of stuff to maintain OS functions, and there will be a bunch of programs running in the memory that aren't related to the game you are playing right this second. I think the principle is that by creating their own OS they can ensure that all of the computers resources are put towards running the game at hand and not for doing auxiliary tasks like iTunes sweeping your music folder for new files or whatever.
All the translation and management layers that lie between the game code and the actual instructions being performed on the hardware. Drivers, OS kernel etc.
This part is funny because it is true.
Don't get me wrong I am hoping this is announced in the really short term so I can cancel my PS4 order but Valve will have a whole lot of control. Let's hope Gabe plays nice
Does this mean, theoretically, Valve could release Steam apps for the next gen consoles that allow Steam games to be streamed over the network and played via said consoles controller?
Because I would like that.
this is not the phone market or tablet market where you are reinventing the wheel(touch screen). This is the PC market which Microsoft has a strangle hold on, if Apple with all its money and resources can't make it past 5% what do you think Valve can do??
I don't think Valve expects everyone to switch over immediately or toss their Windows machines into the garbage, but eventually you'll upgrade and get a new PC and for me, I don't want anything to do with Windows 8 and W7 will eventually go unsupported and become too old to use so why not use an OS that is made for gaming (assuming it's mature enough by then)?
Short term I think many people will just dual boot to try it out.
They made it so you couldn't play Half-Life 2 without Steam when it launched. if Valve is serious about SteamOS I could see this as a possibility.
I'm so fucking confused by this. What's the difference between this and big picture? Are they just saying they're going to have support for future hardware like Blu Ray players? What the hell
Gross
But as a consumer, I will be beholden to Valve instead, while losing my old Windows library. What's the benefit?
I'm starting to think this isn't for PC gamers at all.
Less support for W8 is a good thing... aren't PC gamers worldwide being "screwed" by being forced to upgrade to W8? What is the difference?
You can't put together a pc with similar specs to a ps4 with an attractive case for 400 bucks. Maybe in a few years it will be the case, but right now at the beginning of the next gen, consoles with custom components sold at a loss will always be a better value. The games thing is true, but then you also lose out on the used games market on the steambox, so thats a wash.
The entire market is getting faster and smaller and using less power, and Moores Law doesn't show any signs of slowing.
In 5 years time, a PC the size of a couple of DVD cases stacked on top of each other with a maximum target output resolution of 1080p (your TV) is going to be able to pump out simply phenomenal image quality.
But what does this mean for Steambox?
Either way, it's an interesting development.
Gamers are empowered to join in the creation of the games they love.[/I]
Idk. Was expecting something completely differentMan what? Thats all the input you have? Just gross?
Probably a pipe dream, but I'd love it if Blizzard were to develop for the platform.Yes! This is truly huge. If Valve pulls this, it could mean the end of Windows lock-down on PC gamers.
They made it so you couldn't play Half-Life 2 without Steam when it launched. if Valve is serious about SteamOS I could see this as a possibility.
Of course, but I think they have the balls to try it. Call me crazy, but I think the chances of this happening are greater than a coin toss.There's a difference between "Requires a program" and "Requires another OS".
Huh, I guess you're right. Still baffling to me, I'll just wait to see how it goes. Next announcements will me tomorrow and the day after that right?
Which for the forseeable future is like 98% of games. And I still would need to have a second machine if I want to do some doc sheets, Adobe work, 3d modeling, etc anyway.
If Valve is so keen on making us all into content creators, why separate the machines?
Gross
Ugh, even more Kickstarters and shitty indie games
mother of godAntonio Banderas gif for a new generation
![]()
Idk. Was expecting something completely different
Going forward can steam require that all steam games be compatible with SteamOS?
Of course, but I think they have the balls to try it. Call me crazy, but I think the chances of this happening are greater than a coin toss.
If they can figure out how to get KB+M accuracy in a controller, some new radical idea, this could be big.
I think they're happier being on a platform where they control their own storefront and don't have to give a cut to anyone to release their games on it.Do you think Blizzard / EA / Ubisoft et al are - as corporations - 100% happy and loyal to being "on a micorsoft platform" that they would never consider putting a client anywhere else, even on a proven 'gaming only' open source platform with a userbase of n million?
Yes those shitty mods for skyrim and gta.. That lead to shitty games like dota.
From their webpage:
In SteamOS, we have achieved significant performance increases in graphics processing, and were now targeting audio performance and reductions in input latency at the operating system level. Game developers are already taking advantage of these gains as they target SteamOS for their new releases.
That sounds promising enough to keep an eye out for, if nothing else. You know how a lot of people complained about the choppiness in The Witcher 2 even at 60fps? Maybe in SteamOS they are able to remove that uneven delay between frames that makes it stutter in so many games. Just for lower input latency and performance increases alone though, that's not bad.
But what does this mean for Steambox?
Either way, it's an interesting development.
Okay, lets play "What it'll take for SteamOS to reach 25 million users."
For consoles, this is the magic number at which it becomes difficult for developers to ignore a platform. So lets pretend that for SteamOS/SteamBox, the same general number holds true.
So, what, Left 4 Dead 3, exclusive and free2play?
Portal 3? Half Life 3?
What would it take?
First person on a forum to make the joke towards meWhat's the frequency?
I wouldn't use this but we all gamer should hope this can make pc gaming gain independence over windows eventually, that's how I see it. God bless Valve