Valve announces SteamOS

Status
Not open for further replies.
Because it is also the PS4.

The idea I have is, combining the console marketshare of the PS4 and the first party exclusives Sony can produce with the Steam PC landscape. If you combined PC/Console gaming into one device, why not buy that device? What would stop you?

How awesome would it be to turn on your PS4 and be able to play any PC game on Steam ( which is now most of them ) or any Playstation / PS4 game? It could work like this. If you already have a PC, you could use your PS4 as the main stream device for your PC to the TV ( using Sony's built in streaming hardware they will use for Vita/PS4 remote play ). If you do not have a PC, then the PS4 would run the PC games directly via its own hardware, with the proper scaling automatically done for PC games too much for the PS4 to run maxxed out directly. See what I mean?

Add to that the share functionality of the PS4 and such like that, and you get my meaning. You would also integrate tens of millions of new users into the Steam world and you would give developers even more incentive to develop for Steam/PS4 and thus for Linux/OpenGL.

I don't understand what you're proposing. You're proposing hardware that is today's PS4 hardware, runs PS4 games, also runs Linux games, also runs Steam, also receives streamed games from PC using Valve's tech (which Valve would license to Sony because...?), runs Steam as an OS, also runs Sony's stuff as an OS, none of the games on it can be run on anything else so Sony doesn't lose any income, and the only store on the platform is Sony's so they don't lose any of their share of third-party software sales?

Yes, I guess it's hypothetically possible that Sony could make a Lazarus Ascended Up To Heaven On The Back Of A Unicorn hardware box. But they're not going to.

That doesn't soothe my fears about my current library not being supported by the OS, nor does their streaming bullshit. Unless they can get every game on Steam natively supported by this OS I'm not really seeing why I should waste hard drive space on it.

OK, don't. No one asked you to. Valve isn't asking you to. That's not the point of this OS. It's not about you ditching Windows for SteamOS. That doesn't benefit Valve. They don't care what OS you run. Things are much easier to understand when you try to understand them than when you scream really loudly about how you don't understand them.
 
That doesn't soothe my fears about my current library not being supported by the OS, nor does their streaming bullshit. Unless they can get every game on Steam natively supported by this OS I'm not really seeing why I should waste hard drive space on it.

Do you have fears about not being able to play your PS3 games on your PS4?

You're not wasting hard drive space. You're wiping it out entirely.
 
I WANT TO BELIEVE STUMP, I REALLY DO, I WANT TO BELIEVE. HELP ME BELIEVE

<--- coming from someone who really bought into 2003 as the Year of the Linux Desktop ;.;

Michael Sartian is regularly submitting patches and comments to the LLDB mailing list. I think Valve is taking the necessary steps to turn this into an extremely appealing platform to develop for.
 
The idea I have is, combining the console marketshare of the PS4 and the first party exclusives Sony can produce with the Steam PC landscape. If you combined PC/Console gaming into one device, why not buy that device? What would stop you?

I don't think you understanding Stump's point. The question is this: why isn't Sony putting Uncharted on PC? The explanation for that is the exact same explanation for why they won't allow SteamOS to set up shop inside their walled garden.

How awesome would it be to turn on your PS4 and be able to play any PC game on Steam ( which is now most of them ) or any Playstation / PS4 game? It could work like this. If you already have a PC, you could use your PS4 as the main stream device for your PC to the TV ( using Sony's built in streaming hardware they will use for Vita/PS4 remote play ). If you do not have a PC, then the PS4 would run the PC games directly via its own hardware, with the proper scaling automatically done for PC games too much for the PS4 to run maxxed out directly. See what I mean?

You're explicitly wishfully thinking. "Imagine how amazing a Valve/Nintendo console would be, it would be awesome!!!!" Think through the economics here.
 
Who says major PC titles will begin targeting it? I can't imagine anything beyond indies or small games targeting it initially. This also doesn't solve the fact that most people have huge windows exclusive libraries they're never going to want to abandon.

Valve did....
 
steamosr0c44.jpg

I want to wash his t-shirt lol
 
SteamDB's analysis on today's announcement

SteamOS
SteamOS is here. Let's expand on some of the features Valve announced. What are they actually saying?

In-home Streaming

You can play all your Windows and Mac games on your SteamOS machine, too. Just turn on your existing computer and run Steam as you always have - then your SteamOS machine can stream those games over your home network straight to your TV!
Let's be honest here, both the biggest feature and the biggest problem SteamOS has is that it's based on Linux. More on Linux later this post. This brings a lot of good things to the gaming spectrum, however it also means a rather limited catalog at this point. Valve has definitely been planning this ever since they started working on Steam for Linux and Big Picture.

Streaming games over LAN works pretty damn well for the Nvidia SHIELD, but Valve will definitely be pushing developers to develop their games for Linux (if they aren't already). Developers would be pretty stupid if they don't support Linux now.

Music, TV, Movies

We’re working with many of the media services you know and love. Soon we will begin bringing them online, allowing you to access your favorite music and video with Steam and SteamOS.
What does this really mean? Here are two things that have already been spotted in the current Steam Beta client, but are currently disabled.

Playing local music, making playlists, all from Steam. Import your iTunes music, or play music from a network share.
Built-in Spotify support. Already mostly implemented in Steam beta, but disabled.
We haven't seen the next bit in the Steam client yet, but we can pretty much assume this is a given. Netflix. What's the best way to get TV and Movies on a PC? Netflix? Maybe Hulu.

Linux
SteamOS will primarily be based off Ubuntu, as it has been Valve's focus ever since they started testing Steam for Linux. They already have a repository for Ubuntu 12.04 LTS users designated "hometest", which is obviously short for SteamOS being tested in people's homes. This hometest repository has been around since April. Check out our previous blog post for more on that repository.

I'm secretly hoping Valve will ship with a lighter version of Ubuntu (or not Ubuntu at all), but seeing all their testing has been done on Ubuntu so far, and they only have a repository for Ubuntu at the moment it's looking like Ubuntu will be the thing they ship SteamOS with. Please prove me wrong, Valve.

A problem with Linux is that not a lot of games are supported right now. Valve obviously "fixed" this by introducing in-home streaming, but this is only a temporary solution for developers that want their games played on SteamOS/the SteamBox. Valve WILL be pushing developers to develop for Linux, and will help them out in doing this. How, you ask?

Last week, Gabe mentioned in his LinuxCon keynote that Valve is working with another company on developing a Linux debugger. In previous talks, Valve has shown that debugging and improving graphics performance is much much easier on Linux, since you have deeper access into the operating system and the hardware. With Valve's 'debugger' coming up, developers will have a much easier time developing for Linux than they are having now on Windows.

In-home streaming is basically Valve's answer to people wanting to play games that are not on Linux yet. It won't be optimal, there will be latency and quality issues (it is Steam after all) but in the end it'll push more and more developers to develop natively for Linux as their games aren't being played the way they want them to be played if they're being streamed.

http://steamdb.info/blog/25/
 
They get additional software sales (at a reduced margin, of course--so unless they get substantially more sales it's actually a cash-negative switch) but they can already get additional software sales today. Why isn't TLoU on PC?
Not to budge in, but i think they should (on top of the PS3 release). There's no doubt they would have made more money that way. The absence of PC versions for Sony's games (or any other platform holder for that matter) is rooted in the concept that these exclusives give the the console its prestige and are the impetus of someone buying them.

And they do -- for people who are interested in getting a console. In my mind most of the userbase and the intended userbase for a console would want to get one for those things that make a console what is in compared to a PC. The game existing on PC is much less likely to be a factor in their decision. The direct competitor of the PS3 is the 360. The platform holders will make by offering their exclusives on PC is greater than the money you would calculate being lost by people who are in the market for a console suddenly buying a gaming PC because the game is available there.
 
You can play all your Windows and Mac games on your SteamOS machine, too. Just turn on your existing computer and run Steam as you always have - then your SteamOS machine can stream those games over your home network straight to your TV!

So no magic wrappers that make your entire library available there.



Some sort of Linux distro.

Still dependent on a Windows machine... not what i was hopping for...
would be great to be standalone, and work as a bootable in the main machine, sided by a full linux OS for general usage. <insert image of crushed dream>
 
So let me try and grasp this. Will this SteamOS effectively be an Android type 'free for all' OS that will allow people to use the infrastructure already in place with Steam for their own boxes?

Whenever I think of this it always reminds me of what Philips were trying to achieve with the CD-I (the only non Nintendo system to have a Mario game IIRC) where various OEM could license the tech and produce their own boxes.

So I suppose what I'm asking is could we find the market flooded with various Steamboxes from everyone from Alienware to obscure Chinese manufacturers of varying specs and price?

Yes, I guess it's hypothetically possible that Sony could make a Lazarus Ascended Up To Heaven On The Back Of A Unicorn hardware box. But they're not going to.

Bear and salmon are on the phone for you. They do not sound happy.
 
Unless they are able to get most of the future big releases to work on steamos I just don't see this succeeding as some here hope.


Game streaming is a pipe dream. What I mean is you would be asking users to upgrade 2 machines not just 1 to be able to play the latest and greatest at full resolution and detail. If not then its dual OS boot, but then why bother if you can play everything on the windows partition??


for those that don't know, streaming means it is doing all calculations on the host windows machine.
 
I don't understand what you're proposing. You're proposing hardware that is today's PS4 hardware, runs PS4 games, also runs Linux games, also runs Steam, also receives streamed games from PC using Valve's tech (which Valve would license to Sony because...?), runs Steam as an OS, also runs Sony's stuff as an OS, none of the games on it can be run on anything else so Sony doesn't lose any income, and the only store on the platform is Sony's so they don't lose any of their share of third-party software sales?

Yes, I guess it's hypothetically possible that Sony could make a Lazarus Ascended Up To Heaven On The Back Of A Unicorn hardware box. But they're not going to.



OK, don't. No one asked you to. Valve isn't asking you to. That's not the point of this OS. It's not about you ditching Windows for SteamOS. That doesn't benefit Valve. They don't care what OS you run. Things are much easier to understand when you try to understand them than when you scream really loudly about how you don't understand them.

lol

Does Sony make money off third party software? Or do they make their money back on First Party software? If Valve and Sony joined forces, I'm sure they could work up a contractual understanding with one another as to not step on each others own business toes.

What happens then if Sony and Valve join forces, and then Sony announces Rift support? HOW AWESOME OF A MACHINE WOULD THAT BE! It is like the PS4 is the SSJ. PS4 + Valve + Steam ( if Sony and Valve got together, Half Life 3 PS4/Steam exclusive? )+ Rift???? I MEAN COME ON! SSJ4!

lol..

your right though, won't happen ..... I think ....
 
Will I be able to have win7 and steam OS installed on one PC? and switch between at boot or somthing?

Will the Steam OS versions be the same as the PC version or built specificity for the steam OS.I wonder what sought of graphics options there will be?
 
Isn't it a good thing that this could be the first steps towards removing the reliance on DX and an OS that lives and dies on one company, and moving to OpenGL and Linux?

I dunno. This feels like the pc gaming equivalent of what Google did with the mobile market.
 
That really depends on the individual. Web apps can or already have replaced a fairly large portion of what I need Windows for.

There are a few apps I'd have misgivings about replacing with a lesser Linux equivalent, and all kinds of legacy games/GOG/gamersgate titles that work perfectly fine. When SteamOS can get those two major obstacles out of my way (without requiring a Windows PC to stream from), I'd make the jump.

Until then, I'll stick with Windows and Steam as an application.
Hopefully the last announcement involves an MIT grad messiah.
 
Still dependent on a Windows machine... not what i was hopping for...
would be great to be standalone, and work as a bootable in the main machine, sided by a full linux OS for general usage. <insert image of crushed dream>

You need the old machine for "retrocompatibility". Just like you need a PS3 next to your PS4 to play your old PS3 games. You'll need a Windows computer next to your Steambox to play your old Windows games. Except "next to" means as far away as your local network allows it. Which is very cool.
 
I don't think you understanding Stump's point. The question is this: why isn't Sony putting Uncharted on PC? The explanation for that is the exact same explanation for why they won't allow SteamOS to set up shop inside their walled garden.



You're explicitly wishfully thinking. "Imagine how amazing a Valve/Nintendo console would be, it would be awesome!!!!" Think through the economics here.

Oh sorry, did not explain that well enough.

Sony's first party titles would still be exclusive to the PS4 platform. The Streaming would not go both ways ( unless Valve said that is the only way ). The PS4 would be the main device to use as a Steambox of sorts. The machine would be able to play any SteamOS game, and any Playstation product game. The flip side would not be true, games like Uncharted would not appear on Steam. As I said, unless Valve said the deal is off unless Playstation games are then available on Steam also.

It would benefit Valve though I think to integrate this OS into a home console. It would open the PC gaming world up to tens of millions of people who may not actually be PC gamers.

Your right, it is purely wishful thinking. But Valve HAD to have built an OS instead of a Box for some specific reason. The fact that this is an OS means it can be put inside anything. Which was probably their thinking. Instead of going to war with the console space which controls the TV landscape, instead try and join them ... and in the same instance integrate PC gaming into the living room.
 
Vague but interesting.

Questions abound though. Like what means for games that don't use Steam infrastructure, like the battlenet, origin and uplay games. Will they be relegated to streaming only?

The media stuff. Will steamOS allow for apps so I could have say a plex client for SteamOS?

Interesting though in the wake of the vita streaming ps4 demo and vitatv.
 
You need the old machine for "retrocompatibility". Just like you need a PS3 next to your PS4 to play your old PS3 games. You'll need a Windows computer next to your Steambox to play your old Windows games. Except "next to" means as far away as your local network allows it. Which is very cool.
you will still need to upgrade that windows machine to make native windows games run at max spec.
 
I hope they handle OS updates more gracefully than windows.

It's linux based, so you never need to restart to update stuff right?

I want to see both the OS (software + drivers) and the Steam client on the OS able to update themselves without the need to prompt for an update or restart. Also a really incredible standby/hibernation mode, with instant resuming.
 
Vague but interesting.

Questions abound though. Like what means for games that don't use Steam infrastructure, like the battlenet, origin and uplay games. Will they be relegated to streaming only?

The crucial part is a linux port, not steamworks. Of course you might expect that uplay and origin type games will not be getting one, at least not initially.

The media stuff. Will steamOS allow for apps so I could have say a plex client for SteamOS?

Valve are not really making an OS, but their own flavour. The limiting factor again will be a linux version but also practically controlling such apps with a controller.
 
SteamOS sounds great, but I think they are going to push heavy on the local streaming from your gaming PC for the first bit.
 
SteamOS sounds great, but I think they are going to push heavy on the local streaming from your gaming PC for the first bit.

I would guess the streaming is like a bridge at first between windows-gaming and SteamOS-Gaming.

They cant just directly offer full SteamOS-Support, thats why Streaming is the first important step.
 
I don't think you understanding Stump's point. The question is this: why isn't Sony putting Uncharted on PC? The explanation for that is the exact same explanation for why they won't allow SteamOS to set up shop inside their walled garden.
Uh, Sony is putting Uncharted on PC, last I checked.

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=684513
"Speaking of the ultimate goal, we would like to deliver PlayStation games to all devices. So we’re considering various things like PC, TVs, Blu-ray players, smartphones and tablets. We hope to continue to expand not only to Sony devices, but even to devices other than Sony’s. This is still being studied."
Sure, it's through a streaming service, but Uncharted will most likely be playable on PCs within a year or two.

And Valve has a streaming app too, apparently. I could almost see them exchanging game streaming apps. That'd be fun. Not that Sony needs Valve's help to get a game streaming app on the PC, but hey. :)
 
I hope they handle OS updates more gracefully than windows.

It's linux based, so you never need to restart to update stuff right?

I want to see both the OS (software + drivers) and the Steam client on the OS able to update themselves without the need to prompt for an update or restart. Also a really incredible standby/hibernation mode, with instant resuming.
Linux still needs to restart for some updates. Windows 8 handles updates pretty well imo but still needs restart for some updates as well.
 
you will still need to upgrade that windows machine to make native windows games run at max spec.

If Valve plays it well, most major AAA release will be multiplatform so won't need to upgrade your old Windows computer, just the Steambox. And given its most likely they will standardise hardware into relevant cycles or "grades" (good, better, best, as per Gabe) it will be easier for the devs to optimise code and make their game run better than on Windows anyway.

But all this is wishful thinking obviously.
 
Linux still needs to restart for some updates. Windows 8 handles updates pretty well imo but still needs restart for some updates as well.
Last I checked Linux only has to restart for Kernel updates, which aren't that frequent.

Restarting for other things may be recommended, but I don't think is absolutely necessary.
 
Uh, Sony is putting Uncharted on PC, last I checked.

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=684513

Sure, it's through a streaming service, but Uncharted will most likely be playable on PCs within a year or two.

And Valve has a streaming app too, apparently. I could almost see them exchanging game streaming apps. That'd be fun. Not that Sony needs Valve's help to get a game streaming app on the PC, but hey. :)

Aha! See it is in Sony's mind too!

Valve wants to integrate PC gaming into the living room ...

Sony wants to integrate the Playstation platform into the PC ...

They marry together, combine technologies, share exclusives, and voila .. you have a PlaySteam machine that is capable of the whole package .. including awesome streaming software.

Play PC games on the Vita! COME ON! lol. The touch screen could act as the mouse for games like Rome Total War 2.

A man can dream right? haha. Not being totally serious here of course, it is beyond a long shot, but would be cool ya know. I'll take this awesome OS from Steam as is though and will enjoy SteamOS on my 40" LED 1080p HDTV that is for sure.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom