Valve announces SteamOS

Status
Not open for further replies.
The issue here is that this is a poor alternative for any consumer.
Existing Steam users can get a better experience with their existing PC(complete library and all), and if they need wireless-2-TV there are far better options available as well.
For new users, this competes with other boxes under TV, and the native-library looks weak at this point.

The native library has already grown into the triple digits in a matter of months. That's already an impressive library compared to any console, especially the coming next-gen consoles. If Valve truly has gone into agreements with AAA game publishers then it'll grow a lot more in 2014.
 
They made a 10% gain by updating their game to run on Linux. Who's to say that by making those same adjustments to the game on the Windows side they couldn't see the same gain? With this latest announcement it serves them nicely to have that little comment posted some time ago about how it runs "better" on Linux.

I would love someone to show me this bloat that Windows has? I mean I could see a case being made back in the XP days. But in this day and age? Really?

1) We don't know where that 10% gain came from so just blindly saying "port over those gains" is foolish.

2) Linux can be configured to run custom display managers to run full desktops on machines as weak as a Raspberry Pi, with little knowledge. Windows is designed to do everything (and has the footprint to prove it), whereas something like SteamOS can be made to do just one thing really well.
 
The next level of gaming will show its face on Friday. I hate the "next gen" phrase. I associate it with cheap gimmicks and glamoured target renders.
 
They can't make the same adjustments Windows side because only MS has the code.

Whereas Valve can modify any part of the Linux stack, since it's mostly open source (minus the graphics drivers)

So hold on, you are saying the modified the Linux stack to run a source engine game? So that is what they are doing? Hmm what happens to non source engine games? If you are actually inferring that they have some Secret sauce that makes all OPENGL games run better, that they have a better coder than John Carmack over there, I have an bridge to sell you.

bring up task manager and then hit show all system processes.

Hmm lets see.. With a browser open and FF XIV running in the background.. 12% CPU, 19% memory.. OMG YEAH WHAT A RESOURCE HOG!!
 
They need to make Half Life 3 and Left 4 Dead 3 on SteamOS exclusive on non Windows OS to drive the adoption of SteamOS and increase support of OpenGL driver from AMD and Nvidia.

So it's a win-win for Mac and Linux users.

And it's a loss for both Valve and PC gamers, which far outnumber Mac and Linux gamers. Valve would be stupid to this.
 
They need to make Half Life 3 and Left 4 Dead 3 on SteamOS exclusive on non Windows OS to drive the adoption of SteamOS and increase support of OpenGL driver from AMD and Nvidia.

So it's a win-win for Mac and Linux users.

There's been a lot of posts on this thread suggesting that Valve make either Half-Life 3 or some other hotly-anticipated game exclusive to Steam OS. On the surface, it sounds like a smart way to drive people to the platform, but at the same time it goes against everything Valve is trying to accomplish with this. In Gabe's speech at the Linux convention he blatantly denounced companies who try to keep their content off competitor's platforms.
 
I see a lot of people arguing in a certain way.

Kind of like saying, "Why would I get a Next Gen console if my current gen console already plays all of my games?"

Not EXACTLY, but seriously. If SteamOS came out of the box playing all windows, mac and linux games problem free, then we'd be more afraid of them than awed. The fact is that Valve has set in motion their plans to take over the living room, in a metaphorical sense. This is big. Not immediately, but considering Gabe's previous endeavors, this is really big news.
 
Yea but what about desktop users?

What do you use your desktop for?

Just asking, serious question.

Not EXACTLY, but seriously. If SteamOS came out of the box playing all windows, mac and linux games problem free, then we'd be more afraid of them than awed. The fact is that Valve has set in motion their plans to take over the living room, in a metaphorical sense. This is big. Not immediately, but considering Gabe's previous endeavors, this is really big news.

Hmmm .. I don't think this would happen at all. This could scare Microsoft a ton, considering people will be able to simply stream Titanfall to their living room TV via their Steam Box and play it with maxxed out ultra PC settings along with most other MS games that are also on the PC, but on the Sony end ... don't think this could replace the PS4. The PS4 has too many first party exclusives that people hate to miss, it has too many cool functionality perks and well ... its a Playstation. I mean come on, the PS3 was an utter disaster for what, nearly 3 or 4 years and look at it now. Easily the best console of this generation game wise.

I will have my Steam Box sitting happily next to my PS4 come next year, or whenever it releases. I am going to LOVE THIS upcoming generation. Playing my PS4 games at work / at starbucks / anywhere else via my Vita, and then come home to either play my PS4 or play my PC games on my living room TV, taking up about as much space as a HD-DVR ( or the Xbox One ) with those 2 combined. The future is going to be grand.
 
Summary of the last couple of pages of this thread:

"Only 20-25% of the games I currently own already support the feature that was just announced today!"

"Why would I ever buy something that can only support 20-25% of the games I already own?"

Special Bonus to the above:

"Why would I get this over a PS4/XBOne?"

As the owner of one 780 in my office and a weaker HTPC in my media room (separated by 50 feet of hallway and stairs and one Cat6 cable), the streaming component of this sounds fantastic to me. I'm no latency whore, so I am betting I won't even notice it, but I bet I will notice the super nice graphics on my relatively weak HTPC set up.
 
I like the idea of this.

No windows overhead bloat, an OS purely for gaming.

If steamos can run games faster than windows would on the same hardware.. could be the future.

Backwards compatibility with old Windows only games is no different from ps4 not playing ps1,2 or 3 games.
 
So hold on, you are saying the modified the Linux stack to run a source engine game? So that is what they are doing? Hmm what happens to non source engine games? If you are actually inferring that they have some Secret sauce that makes all OPENGL games run better, that they have a better coder than John Carmack over there, I have an bridge to sell you.

1. No, Valve ported the Source engine to Linux, though they did also allude to working on tools that would make it easier for anyone to port any game.
2. We're not necessarily talking about performance improvements as some kind of secret sauce OS feature, but through working with AMD and Nvidia to improve driver support for Linux. The performance gains come from the fact that OpenGL is faster than DirectX.
 
Yea but what about desktop users?

Linux Mint or whatever random popular Linux desktop of the day happens to be. Or learn a bit more and install Debian or something. Those distros will benefit from the work Valve is doing as well.

Hmm lets see.. With a browser open and FF XIV running in the background.. 12% CPU, 19% memory.. OMG YEAH WHAT A RESOURCE HOG!!

Not insignificant for weaker machines. Unless you're implying that every machine only uses 12% CPU to run Final Fantasy XIV.
 
I like the idea of this.

No windows overhead bloat, an OS purely for gaming.

If steamos can run games faster than windows would on the same hardware.. could be the future.

Backwards compatibility with old Windows only games is no different from ps4 not playing ps1,2 or 3 games.

Not true. If you can't play Windows only games Steam O/S will never get off the ground. No dev is gonna start developing to a limited O/S like Linux unless they can get the sales they currently get on Windows.
 
I see a lot of people arguing in a certain way.

Kind of like saying, "Why would I get a Next Gen console if my current gen console already plays all of my games?"

Not EXACTLY, but seriously. If SteamOS came out of the box playing all windows, mac and linux games problem free, then we'd be more afraid of them than awed. The fact is that Valve has set in motion their plans to take over the living room, in a metaphorical sense. This is big. Not immediately, but considering Gabe's previous endeavors, this is really big news.

Umm well you know this is PC Gaming, not console gaming.

PC Gamers expect to run 10+ year old games on their machines without a HITCH.
 
Mainly steam client and web surfing.

mal-what.gif
 
So hold on, you are saying the modified the Linux stack to run a source engine game? So that is what they are doing? Hmm what happens to non source engine games? If you are actually inferring that they have some Secret sauce that makes all OPENGL games run better, that they have a better coder than John Carmack over there, I have an bridge to sell you.




Hmm lets see.. With a browser open and FF XIV running in the background.. 12% CPU, 19% memory.. OMG YEAH WHAT A RESOURCE HOG!!



let me first say that this has nothing to do with steam OS.. its not replacing windows.. Im just proving a point for windows bloat.



cpu resource percentage does not matter when there is multiple procs waiting in line.

here a little experiment for you if you have 2 hdds.


make 2 folders .. in one folder put 1 huge file.. like video around 500 megs or so.

in folder 2 put 1500 1k txt files.

now transfer them to the other hdd

it will take much much longer for the folder with the text files to transfer than the much larger single file even though they take up next to nothing in resources.

same thing happens with your CPU is queuing up processes.

windows it built off of old systems files layered with new files each rendition. os bloat has been a problem for a long time now.
 
Umm well you know this is PC Gaming, not console gaming.

PC Gamers expect to run 10+ year old games on their machines without a HITCH.

Yea backward compatibility is very important to me. Its one of the main reasons i like PC gaming. Steam os only will not play older titles.
 
So hold on, you are saying the modified the Linux stack to run a source engine game? So that is what they are doing? Hmm what happens to non source engine games? If you are actually inferring that they have some Secret sauce that makes all OPENGL games run better, that they have a better coder than John Carmack over there, I have an bridge to sell you.

They've worked with the graphics card makers and (from what I know) submitted patches upstream to be incorporated into Ubuntu / Linux that improved performance.
 
Way too early to be excited. Or horrified. Or whatever.

Honestly, the only thing I really want is to use my TV as an output for my PC, while using a controller as an input device for the game... all from clear across the house. Best of both worlds, my PC can already play these games in kick-ass mode.
 
Yea backward compatibility is very important to me. Its one of the main reasons i like PC gaming. Steam os only will not play older titles.

There is no garuntee it will play the newer titles. Unless Valve can show the sales are there this likely will just be a flash in the pan and go away.
 
Dam you guys hate windows way too much lol.

I don't hate Windows.

However, listing dumb use-cases where SteamOS isn't useful doesn't do us much good.

There is no garuntee it will play the newer titles. Unless Valve can show the sales are there this likely will just be a flash in the pan and go away.

Obviously Steam was the same way. It sucked, and it could have turned into nothing, but then it stopped sucking. I would anticipate that Valve has a plan and support for this or they wouldn't be doing it. They have a track record of being smart.

Don't hurt yourself with all that reaching.

Post something of worth or get out.
 
Nintendo or Sony would need to basically hire a new company's worth of people to support an OS.

The advantage of reskinning a Linux distro is you're outsourcing your OS division to the rest of the world
 
Dam you guys hate windows way too much lol.

Nah, we just don't shut down a new platform for the sole purpose of "but this is how it is now". That's not how technology works, and especially not video games.

There is no garuntee it will play the newer titles. Unless Valve can show the sales are there this likely will just be a flash in the pan and go away.

Name 3 things Valve have done in the past 5 years that have been a flash in the pan.
 
I read OP again and again and I still don't get the point of this.

Nvidia has their built in hardware decoder to make their shield player workable. Sony has dedicated hardware for this on both vita and PS4.

Steam on the other hand have to deal with multiple different hardwares. How are they gonna handle this? Are they going to make different drivers for each hardware?

For PC master race, this stuff is guaranteed to suck when playing FPS game, too. I really don't see the point.
 
The proliferation of x86 will be down considerably in the consumer environment over the next 5 years.
SteamOS is the first step towards ARM/OGL compatibility

PbgWqDX.png
.



You can always dualboot on any of the Steambox models to get that 100% compatibility.

This graph is hilarious. 0%, then 1%, then 10%, then 100%, all equally divided so it looks like there are actual significant gains being made in linux when in actuality it's 1.2%
 
After reading further, this seems more geared towards a Vita & PS4 relationship. Extending the usage of my expensive desktop to other rooms.

How cheap will making a streambox be?
 
So if I buy a game on Steam that's too powerful for my terrible PC to run will it work through this on my tv? Or is it still tied to the PC's performance? I really don't understand technology or even what Linux is.
 
So if I buy a game on Steam that's too powerful for my terrible PC to run will it work through this on my tv? Or is it still tied to the PC's performance? I really don't understand technology or even what Linux is.

If you are "streaming" the game to your TV using Steam then the performance is directly related to your PC, and more than likely the streaming will cost additional resources.
You will only lose performance streaming to the SteamBox.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom