First time I've ever heard it, for sure.So why not educate rather than deride? Not all of us end up around people who use such language.
First time I've ever heard it, for sure.So why not educate rather than deride? Not all of us end up around people who use such language.
Hey maybe I actually read up on history and racial issues not feign ignorance on the internet for fun, revel in my ignorance and play stupid about easily found materials.
Forgive my interjection, but might I suggest that we move past arguing about whether or not we should or shouldn't be familiar with the notion of words having a racist connotation? For what it's worth, I would suggest that "uppity" having racist overtures should be somewhat common knowledge. However, I don't know if I'd go so far as to assert that its usage is ubiquitously racist. Given that, I'm not sure this is an argument worth having.
negative reviews are racist, obviously.
Now if that's the case, and if in her Mass Communications class, the history of media and the representation of women and minorities in media was a often referenced topic, then racial discussions would predictably occur. Holy shit, you have to talk about black people, women, the 60s and the 70s and the change in the media, you're out of the suburbs now kid.
negative reviews are racist, obviously.
Why post this? You're not usually so caustic. As if you've never been ignorant before.
I'm sorry I didn't respond pleasantly to a poster who does this consistently.
This, pretty much. Education is not only about grades and memorization, but rather to be confronted with ideas other than your own.
Folks, I'm going to drop the "friendly suggestion" facade and state more directly that we need to keep this civil and avoid personal attacks.
So why not educate rather than deride? Not all of us end up around people who use such language.
Would it still be alright if we discussed in general the idea of locally applicable slurs? Or is that a discussion for another time? It's really interesting to me, as I've honestly haven't heard any of the words in this thread used in racial contexts, nor have I had any previous knowledge of the relation to racial contexts. But if this thread is already hitting too many notes as it is, I don't want to make it even more hectic.
Well, the discussion has veered primarily into being a racial discussion for some time. So, though some of us might prefer (particularly stumpokapow who is very interested in the debate about academia and the responsibility of the institution/instructors/students therein), I'm not trying to shut down inevitable turns a thread might take. But we'll lock this thread before it just becomes users bickering about something this inconsequential (i.e. whether people should or shouldn't know the connotations of words). It's simply not an argument worth having.
Re: stump's post, while I do agree that framing Intro courses in terms of a professor's area of interest/expertise is not uncommon, I would argue that such tends to be detrimental, most of the time. The entire purpose of an intro course is to give students a high-level overview of the field they're studying, allowing them to discover potential areas of interest (and perhaps even specialty).
For people who are familiar with the uppity/shoulder chip terms, do you guys think this is something that is found in Canada?
There should be a list of English terms with bad racial history behind them. As someone with English as a third language, those connotations are not at all obvious when seen in innocuous contexts, and I feel it's always assumed they are. I mean, I've never seen "chip on your shoulder" connected to racism before today.
I'd have to know more/have been there to really have an educated opinion about this. I don't necessarily disagree with the basic premise she said as her self-defense but you'd just have to be there. It is definitely easy to imagine 3 young white males without a lot of perspective taking discussion of privilege and institutional racism the wrong way.
Hey maybe I actually read up on history and racial issues not feign ignorance on the internet for fun, revel in my ignorance and play stupid about easily found materials.
Yes it is the same. When it's said to a woman it's derogatory and it's racist when said to a black person.Fair enough, hopefully we can keep it from turning into something that banal for a while longer.
For people who are familiar with the uppity/shoulder chip terms, do you guys think this is something that is found in Canada? I'm thinking that's maybe why I've sincerely never found them to be used racially. Also, do you guys think they're the sort of phrases that could offend people even if used in innocent contexts? For example, 'that's so gay' or 'stop being such a faggot', even when not applied to homosexuality, I find are wildly offensive and inappropriate, so I do my best to dissuade people I know from using the terms (luckily it's not really something I have to worry about often). Does the shoulder chip and uppityness fall under the same umbrella? Or is it more like cunt in the U.K. vs cunt in north america?
I've gotten that before. I spoke to someone over the phone and when I met them in person the pulled that shit out. It pretty much meant "I didn't expect you to be black!"don't call a black person "well spoken" either cut that shit out
Yeah, I'm african american, and I haven't even heard this phrase before.
For the white students who escalated their discomfort to the administration at MCTC, what seemed to upset them most is the concept of structural racism. As a teacher, I find that all students struggle with the idea of structure. The American myth of rugged individualism is alive and well. We love to believe that nothing determines our lifes chances but our capacity to dream and work hard, despite reams of evidence to the contrary. For most students, my class is the first time they have ever talked seriously about capitalism or had a black woman as an authority figure. And when the structure in question is racism and someone who looks like me is leading the discussion, white students struggle particularly hard. How can something be racist if they do not intend it to be racist? And why should they listen to me? Sociologists like Joe Faegin and Eduardo Bonilla-Silva have dismantled our post-racial delusions, showing how racism happens without racists.
From the survey mentioned above:But hurt feelings can be bad for business. And a lot of powerful people think colleges should act more like businesses. When they do, students act more like customers. And our likely customers might not be amicable to discussions about structural racism. If the customer is always right, then the majority share of customers is more right than the minority. While blacks and Hispanics have increased their college participationand they are projected to continue to do so61 percent of all college students are still white. A survey from researchers at Tufts and Harvard found that whites believe that they have replaced blacks as the primary victims of racial discrimination in contemporary America. A sizable number of male voters seem to believe that men are still more naturally suited to be president of the United States. Young people think racist and sexist slurs are wrong, but they don't take much personal offense.
What needs to be seen though? Is institutional racism real and a problem. The answer is yes to both. Unless she was discussing this 90% of the time and it took away from the class, I don't think it should be an issue.
Yes it is the same. When it's said to a woman it's derogatory and it's racist when said to a black person.
Google it and see a few examples of it. Don't google "uppity nigger" though... that was... wow.
I've gotten that before. I spoke to someone over the phone and when I met them in person the pulled that shit out. It pretty much meant "I didn't expect you to be black!"
Well, you can still present it in a way that's over-the-top or aggressive. When we're talking about how people present something what's on paper is only so much. Ya kinda have to be there. We're on the same side though, we probably shouldn't argue.
Someone should start a thread for phrases with racist/sexist origins so the rest of us know. I'm with you here.
lol really? It's been in the news as recently as 2011 when Rush called Michelle Obama uppity..
and in 2008 when a senator called Obama uppity...
The word has racial roots because the first recorded usage of it was from the song Uncle Remus..
From the survey mentioned above:
![]()
don't call a black person "well spoken" either cut that shit out
you know I never really thought about that. I will say anyone is well spoken if I think they carry themselves well and are intelligent no matter who or what race they are. I never really gave thought to any racial connotations so I guess I should be a little more careful next time?
Whenever it has been said to me, it's said with a bit of surprise. As if they were expecting me to speak in some sort of urban vernacular.
I don't think its conscious racism but being shocked because I don't fit into their preconceived notion of what a black person should be is incredibly insulting.
Whenever it has been said to me, it's said with a bit of surprise. As if they were expecting me to speak in some sort of urban vernacular.Shit, growing up, being "well spoken" was a common compliment that I received from everyone from teachers during parent/teacher conferences, reports on tests, strangers I interacted with in various places like jobs or social gatherings. It happens. And it's fricking obnoxious and insulting. But, hey, I grin and bare it, because if I let my irritation show, or comment on it, I'm just trying to "see racism where it doesn't exist!" or somehow becoming "aggressive."
Being a black male in America is almost like when you had to attend some kind of serious event, or go to church, or anything where you're told to sit your ass down and behave, only that, instead of being able to be yourself as soon as you leave the church/event, etc, you can't! 24/7, you have to be on your best behavior, lest you "scare people or make them uncomfortable." It's just so much fun!
...
On the one hand I agree. That statement is fucking messy and could only ever be aimed at white males without incurring society's wrath. Much like smokers, white males are a group that it's OK to openly target. The mindset that gives birth to that phrase is racist, prejudicial, and destructive.
On the other hand, as a white male between the ages of 12 and 35, I find it difficult to give the slightest shit. It's like people hating on me for winning the lottery or something. Sure, I didn't earn it, but it's mine anyway. You're welcome to hold it against me because it ain't going to make the slightest difference in my life.
It ain't reverse racist though, it's just racist. Maybe ageist too. I'm not sure why the over 35s got a pass.
Why do you keep saying you won the lottery for being born white?
I don't even.
He didn't say that. He was offering an anecdote "It's like people hating on me for winning the lottery or something."
You don't even what? Know how to read?
Or understand analogies. Even if he said "being born white is like winning the lottery" in a less anecdotal way, he would still be implying that being born white gives him certain social benefits.
I don't see why that's offensive though. For the most part it's true, even if unfair, and the reason why we're having this thread in the first place.
don't call a black person "well spoken" either cut that shit out
Whenever it has been said to me, it's said with a bit of surprise. As if they were expecting me to speak in some sort of urban vernacular.
I don't think its conscious racism but being shocked because I don't fit into their preconceived notion of what a black person should be is incredibly insulting.
Everyone who has said to me has been someone I have encountered during work and I have never said anything. I bite my tongue and move on... the strange thing is, I wouldn't put up with that in my personal life but since it's for work I have to take it... it's a very strange feeling.