PAX To Increase Inclusivity Effort With “Roll For Diversity – Hub And Lounge”

"enforcers" in those areas to make sure people behave.

Enforcer is a term that's been used to describe the volunteers that have helped PAX attendees since the convention's inception.

Hmmm. I wonder what special identifying symbols will be on the conference badges of those attendees that are to be in the "zones".

How about special badges they can wear?

Just so we know who is who.

I just got accused of trying to kill discussion. My fucking god.
 
Their hearts are in the right place, but I don't think that segregating these sort of resources when it should be as open as widespread as possible is really a good call.

They're proposing segregation to solve the issue at hand.

It is absolutely, 100%, without doubt or question as fucked up as it's being made out to be.

People need to look up the definition for segregation. Cuz networking rooms and dedicated space to issues ain't it. (again, the exact opposite in fact...)
 
I love threads like these... great for letting me know who on Gaf to set to Ignore.

I think these lounges are a great thing. Showed a trans friend, she said the same thing.
 
...That's not what's happening at all? Do you think they're just roping people off into these lounges and banning conversation elsewhere about these topics? No. These are networking meet ups. Now instead of wandering around in a sea of twenty year old white guys, people of other diversities can have a mutual place to meet each other and trade contact info and converse. Now there are central locations for these conversations to happen instead of being drowned out in the crowd. Now there are meet ups where people can discover that "hey, I'm not the only non-white guy here. There's others like me! Gee, that sure makes me feel better and more accepted by the industry".

Minorities know they exist in numbers in the industry. It's getting the industry and community to acknowledge that which remains the problem.

People are disparaging the idea because the assumption is these lounges will be set off from the rest of the show, instead of front and center. Meaning they'll act as "out of sight, out of mind".

Make the entire convention a safe space. Put diversity right alongside everything else.

"We desire more representation and acknowledgement of minorities within the gaming community."

"At our next convention, we plan on better accommodating minorities within the gaming medium by offering them areas where they can communicate with and meet people who are similar to them, so that they feel a sense of acknowledgement within the gaming community."

"Why are you paying so much attention to the minorities of the gaming community? Are you trying to point them out as different?"

If I'm understanding this situation correctly, I am not understanding why so many people are having such volatile reactions. Isn't Penny Arcade attempting to reduce the chance of minorities within the community feeling different or strange?

Putting someone in their own space doesn't help make them feel less different.

The positive is the idea that someone who wants to learn about diversity has a place to go to learn. For minorities themselves, there's less of a benefit.

Comparing this to Jim Crow is hilarious.

And by hilarious, I mean a fucking travesty.

Yeah, that is an unhelpful comparison.
 
I don't see an issue with this? They're areas for specific booths for information on these topics, just like how they have it setup for everything.
 
It's definitely misguided and cynical when you consider Mike's obvious transphobia. The convention planners are attempting to damage control a serious issue. Mike's week of verbal diarrhea happened and now the diversity lounge magically becomes a thing for PAX? What a coincidence!

Two moderately related organizations/people have opinions on a common social issue! A CONSPIRACY IS AFOOT.


Honestly, do you think those two guys are the ONLY ones in charge of this event? That there isn't an entire existing staff dedicated to getting the largest public gaming convention in the US off the ground?
 
I love threads like these... great for letting me know who on Gaf to set to Ignore.

I think these lounges are a great thing. Showed a trans friend, she said the same thing.

You can ignore people on GAF?!

Thanks for the info! And yes, this thread is a gold mine for that.
 
I think these lounges are a great thing. Showed a trans friend, she said the same thing.

I'm transgendered and I think it's cynical, pandering bullshit from an unapologetic bigot and his organization. But hey, diversity lounge! Please exchange business cards in the designated box and forget our terrible boss!
 
How about they just make one giant lounge and call it the 'Discussion Lounge'. Add some games in there to get people to play with each other. Maybe invite developers to do panels and stuff too.

It'll be like a convention.
 
Because it's also an expo for showing off videogames? You can say that the entire event should be a meeting of professional minds - but PAX is a combination trade-show, concert collection, community meet-up, and tournament central. At some point you need to specify a space for like-minded people to congregate, outside of the general chaos.

What PAX really needs is just a "professionals" lounge. Just a spot for discussion - no trailers being shoved in your face, no demos - just an open space where people can hold smaller discussions about larger gaming issues.

It's a videogame show first, and can't it also be a place where all videogame culture discussions are welcome throughout.
 
Boy, this would be an easy thread for a Junior like me to get banned in... Must...tread...lightly...

I'll say this about poor PA at this stage... Walk in a minefield and unfortunately you're gonna step on some mines.

I see why they could see such rooms as useful and beneficial to the intended users. It's also blatantly obvious why some see this as distasteful segregation. I believe both sides are coming at the issue with good intentions, but no doubt some will find a way to make the other side out to be unfeeling monsters.
 
They're proposing segregation to solve the issue at hand.

It is absolutely, 100%, without doubt or question as fucked up as it's being made out to be.
Do you know how these expos are structured and scheduled? Are you aware, once again, that these issues are still discussed elsewhere within PAX, focused toward making more people aware? And that this, offering an area to network with and open dialogue much more easily with others vested in the topics not to mention developers and companies offering insights, advice, and jobs, is not mutually exclusive from everything else pertaining at the convention?
 
Why are people attacking this and comparing it to segregation.

Oh they just read the headline.

Carry on..

..but nothing wrong with this. At least they are trying, and they have in the past. Mike's done some stupid shit, sure.. but he seems to be growing from it. The community would be better trying to educate someone like that instead of constantly attack.
 
I don't get the backlash. They're equal to the normal guests, they're just separated from them for their own protection.
 
Some of the responses in this thread are simply embarrassing.

Seems like the people behind this plan had good intentions, but obviously you can't please everyone, especially not people who don't even understand what this is.
 
I'm transgendered and I think it's cynical, pandering bullshit from an unapologetic bigot and his organization. But hey, diversity lounge! Please exchange business cards in the designated box and forget our terrible boss!
Whether or not the PA guys were involved (I really doubt it) doesn't mean much to me here, because I can only see good coming out of it.
 
I still don't quite understand what this means.

The “Roll for Diversity Hub and Lounge” will be launched as part of a push to provide a resource hub for PAX attendees in relation to marginalized communities within the gaming audience, including women, people of color, the disabled, LGBTQ communities and those with mental illness. It will be a hub for communication, networking and, hopefully, an increased understanding of issues facing these communities every day and the promotion of a tolerant, safe space within PAX.

There's going to be an area(s) at PAX where women, "colored" people, mental people, ect ect can go and get information on games and events because they don't feel comfortable being around people different than themselves?
 
I'm transgendered and I think it's cynical, pandering bullshit from an unapologetic bigot and his organization. But hey, diversity lounge! Please exchange business cards in the designated box and forget our terrible boss!

Fucking bingo. I'm a minority, granted not transgendered, but this shit is insulting. Here's your special corner, hope you feel welcome.
 
Who actually thought that this is a great idea? Unless they're planning to run some talks addressing diversity on those places, this is cringe-inducing at best. And if they want to run some talks on diversity, why not just hold it in public for everyone to attend?
 
About time the blue man group got in.

Hey, if it means I'll actually be able to get a badge for Prime 2014 then I'm down to douse myself with a buck of paint.

Seriously though, I commend Penny Arcade for taking steps to be more inclusive of the larger gaming community (the LGBT-themed panels were some of the things I enjoyed most at PAXs' past so I think this is a good thing). I'm not nuts about the name "Diversity Hub & Lounge" but the intent is sound and that's what matters.
 
Minorities know they exist in numbers in the industry. It's getting the industry and community to acknowledge that which remains the problem.

People are disparaging the idea because the assumption is these lounges will be set off from the rest of the show, instead of front and center. Meaning they'll act as "out of sight, out of mind".

Make the entire convention a safe space. Put diversity right alongside everything else.

And these diversity lounges are there to help the community acknowledge the problem and broaden discussion on these topics. I'm not sure why you're just assuming the Expo has vile intentions for this and plan to hide away discussion. The very idea of these rooms are to broaden conversation and bring it to the fore front! It's not like these rooms are going to be hidden away in a back alleyway somewhere. Nothing in that PR statement suggests that these diversity rooms won't be front and center at the Expos just like every other themed area.
 
Why are so many posters obsessed with this idea of good intentions? Why does it matter what people's intentions are? It's a multi-million dollar large scale public event with a board, not a fucking birthday gift.
 
Mike's done some stupid shit, sure.. but he seems to be growing from it. The community would be better trying to educate someone like that instead of constantly attack.

The community did try to educate him and all he did was childishly misunderstand what they tried to convey. All anyone got was a passive-aggressive half-apology that basically amounted to "Sorry that I got caught and called out for saying intolerant and bigoted nonsense".
 
I still don't quite understand what this means.



There's going to be an area(s) at PAX where women, "colored" people, mental people, ect ect can go and get information on games and events because they don't feel comfortable being around people different than themselves?
No.

Does a career booth mean that unemployed folks can only stay at that booth?
 
Yep, segregation fixes everything. Just ask civil rights groups or the Nazis. I swear this is just asking for a Twitter blow up.
 
If it's intended to be permanent than it's a bad idea, but as a first step into creating some type of infrastructure for minorities to build around in an industry that otherwise generally ignores minorities pretty much completely or blatantly offends them (making the environment inherently hostile) it's a great move.

It also makes financial sense for the worldwide market consider outside of the US, with in the world's population those that are "Minorities" become part of the larger majority making for a very large potential target market outside the US that hasn't been very well tapped by the games industry.
 
It's a videogame show first, and can't it also be a place where all videogame culture discussions are welcome throughout.

PAX already has a central rule of "Don't be a D-Bag". It's not like the convention has turned into a live-action forum, where people shout racial expletives with pride. The convention as it is, is a fun gathering place for like-minded gamers.
That doesn't mean it's a great place for discussion though. Sure you have panels & spots to hang out - but I see the appeal in having a designated spot for people to meet up & talk about a common issue. Someplace quiet, far away enough from the hectic part of the show floor so it feels more calm.
You're confusing the realities of planning & running a convention with censorship.
 
The community did try to educate him and all he did was childishly misunderstand what they tried to convey. All anyone got was a passive-aggressive half-apology that basically amounted to "Sorry that I got caught and called out for saying intolerant and bigoted nonsense".

So you've given up forever, then?
 
And these diversity lounges are there to help the community acknowledge the problem and broaden discussion on these topics. I'm not sure why you're just assuming the Expo has vile intentions for this and plan to hide away discussion. The very idea of these rooms are to broaden conversation and bring it to the fore front! It's not like these rooms are going to be hidden away in a back alleyway somewhere. Nothing in that PR statement suggests that these diversity rooms won't be front and center at the Expos just like every other themed area.

How is having a separate "lounge" helping anyone acknowledge problems? That's like saying having separate facilities for colored people helped people acknowledge racism. Lol okay.
 
ITT - idiots who immediately cry out in hatred at past perceived offenses by PA and don't bother to actually read what this thing is.

This is the first honest step I've seen these guys take in acknowledging that they and their fanbase may have issues dealing with people and it's a step towards educating themselves and their fanbase on what's wrong with how they've acted in the past.

But yeah, go ahead and blindly spout vitriol even when PA does something good for a change because it makes you seem just as bad in my eyes :D
 
How is having a separate "lounge" helping anyone acknowledge problems? That's like saying having separate facilities for colored people helped people acknowledge racism. Lol okay.
Call it a room. A hall. A booth. Does that change your perception?

This sounds pretty good.
If anything, most posts here are just knee-jerk reactions because reasons.
*Because reading comprehension
 
Enforcer is a term that's been used to describe the volunteers that have helped PAX attendees since the convention's inception.
If it were just "helping" is there a reason they're not called, say, "helpers"? What is it they've enforced in the past? I'm legitimately curious how the term has been applied. If it's just coincidental that the term sounds batshit crazy now but has had honest-to-god enforcement duties in the past then that's cool.

Still really not a good term for the assigned task in this case and makes it sound downright terrible. Not the sort of thing you want in press releases.
 
Why are so many posters obsessed with this idea of good intentions? Why does it matter what people's intentions are? It's a multi-million dollar large scale public event with a board, not a fucking birthday gift.

It always matters what people's intentions are. Shit, the entire criminal law is based around the idea of intention, or 'mens rea'.

Whether or not a person or company intended to do harm or not is essential to answering the question 'are they morally culpable'. If no harm was intended, (or more accurate reasonably foreseen as happening) they are not.

Intention always matters.
 
Segregating the minorities putting even more of a focus in that they're "not normal" instead of treating them like "normal" people.

Just what everyone wanted?

Yep, putting them even more apart is only aggravating the issue.
 
How is having a separate "lounge" helping anyone acknowledge problems? That's like saying having separate facilities for colored people helped people acknowledge racism. Lol okay.

Do you even know what PAX is? It's a convention. There are rooms across the entire convention for many subjects. There's really no other way this can be done. Every room has a specific purpose. This isn't being singled out or anything. It's being allotted a space just the same as everything else.
 
Yep, putting them even more apart is only aggravating the issue.

the key misunderstanding here being that that's not what they're doing

Do you know how these expos are structured and scheduled? Are you aware, once again, that these issues are still discussed elsewhere within PAX, focused toward making more people aware? And that this, offering an area to network with and open dialogue much more easily with others vested in the topics not to mention developers and companies offering insights, advice, and jobs, is not mutually exclusive from everything else pertaining at the convention?

who knows what an expo looks like show of hands
 
Valtýr;93957661 said:
Do you even know what PAX is? It's a convention. There are rooms across the entire convention for many subjects. There's really no other way this can be done. Every room has a specific purpose. This isn't being singled out or anything. It's being allotted a space just the same as everything else.

It isn't being singled out? There's a separate room for diversity. That's the definition of being singled out.
 
Boy, this would be an easy thread for a Junior like me to get banned in... Must...tread...lightly...

I'll say this about poor PA at this stage... Walk in a minefield and unfortunately you're gonna step on some mines.

I see why they could see such rooms as useful and beneficial to the intended users. It's also blatantly obvious why some see this as distasteful segregation. I believe both sides are coming at the issue with good intentions, but no doubt some will find a way to make the other side out to be unfeeling monsters.

Trust me, some established users are handling this issue with less understanding than you. You're fine.

And yes. At this point, I don't think PA can do anything related to diversity issues without blowing themselves up in the process. The best thing they could have done in this case was to either keep things as they were (panels focused on the issue, non-focused discussion) - or to label this as a "Professional Lounge", and use the space to hold talks dealing with these issues. The fact they actually printed a paper under PAX letterhead that uses the term "Diversity Lounges" only suggests that they need to fire their PR department.
 
WOW! Networking and discussion room for minorities being equated to Jim Crow laws and Jewish ghettos.
I'm sure you know this, but it's still worth pointing out that it's not even necessarily *for* minorities, because that would imply it's exclusionary. It's *for* everyone interested in those issues.
 
Top Bottom