Tony Dungy was brilliant despite all the hate he gets.
The number 1 argument and most valid for me is the weapons vs. weapons here. Peyton had the edge, he had marvin, he had reggie wayne, he had dallas clark, etc. etc. Brady had givens, patten, brown, branch, etc. Hell even this year, that broncos team is so ridiculously stacked, much more so than the 07 squad. The 07 thing was a lot on Randy as well, but Brady was amazing that season. Compare it side by side
#1 Randy Moss (Best by a lot to be fair) > Demarius whose a beast in his own right
#2 Welker, who was good, but still new that season < Welker smarter veteran
#3 Donte Lolworth <<<<< Erick Decker
#4 Gaffney, love him, but cmon < Julius Thomas
#5 Laurence Maroney(LOLOL) <<<<<<<<<<< Knoshon
I'd take a team with talent similar to this squad over the 07 squad any day, they were too 1 dimensional (as is Josh Mcdaniels.), hell I thought their team in '11 was better if it wasn't for Aarons MCL sprain and Ocho not knowing a single play, they would've broke every record in the book.
I think a lot of people overlook the 2010 season of Brady's because of the flashy, 16 - 0, 50 TD season of 2007. Brady threw 36 Touchdowns and
four interceptions that season, which is also an NFL record, and 0.8% interception rate (I believe also a record). That's one of the most impressive passing seasons ever and it's one that I doubt we'll ever see broken. If any quarterback surpasses it, it'll be Aaron Rodgers... He threw 45 TDs and only
six interceptions in one season with a 1.2% interception rate. For reference, this is Peyton Manning's best season interception rate wise, at 1.6, double Brady's in 2010.
Taking off a similar point that you made in a post about wide receivers who found success in New England. Besides Randy Moss and Wes Welker, successful WR's in New England have done
nothing in other cities after leaving New England... Branch, David Givens, David Patton, Reche Caldwell, Ben Watson, Daniel Graham, Germaine Wiggins... I mean, you can go down the list of targets that have won 1, 2, and 3 Super Bowls with Tom Brady at QB and they are a list of forgettable nobodies who nobody has heard of. Fans were clamoring for ownership to put talent around Brady, and in 2007 they went out and did it... sort of. Randy Moss is a proven great, one of the all time great wide receivers... But Wes Welker was a decent, mostly quiet slot receiver who in 4 season in the NFL only put up 600 yards once. Up until joining the Patriots, Welker had 1 career touchdown. They also added Dante Stallworth who was, at the time, considered a much bigger weapon than Welker. In effect, you added two players to the offense, one all time great, and then a guy who was mostly forgettable to everybody in the league other than Dolphins fans. The result was the best offensive display in league history up to that point.
But, player for player, the talent on this Denver team is far superior to the talent on the '07 Patriots roster. I also think that this Denver offense is the best offense in NFL history.
I wouldn't chalk it up to just that, nothing works in a vacuum like that, injuries have derailed them both times... don't get me wrong they were flat out outplayed in the first game, but the helmet catch was miraculous, and Their best player was useless with a gimpy ankle. Not to mention their defense the last 5 years have been HISTORICALLY bad. The secondary has been a joke, and the drafting has been disastrous, which I put on Bill and Kraft for refusing to sign free agents. They've desperately needed- safeties, cornerbacks, and pass rushers. They've drafted trash after trash- Darius Butler, Jonathan Wilhite, Ras-I-Dowling, Meriweather, chung, wheatley. They finally made a move and brought in Talib and it's changed things around. Unfortunately as soon as they did this they decided to not spend a dime on offense, dropping Welker, missing out on any free agent receiver, letting Woodhead walk, and obviously nobodies fault the whole Hernandez ordeal.
In both Super Bowls, the Patriots hit their perfect storm matchup.. Much like how the Rams in 2001 went up against the only team they wouldn't be able to beat. the 2010 Super Bowl was the worse of the two... because the offensive line couldn't protect against a fast, long defense, which is exactly what the Giants had.
Last year, I was very optimistic for the Patriots future because they had transitioned into a team that was totally different than 2007, and one that would see them be successful with an aging Brady. Unfortunately, the persistent injuries to Gronkowski, Hernandez fiasco, and the major injuries to the defense this season prevent it from being apparent. This was a bit of a window year, a year for a solid run at the Super Bowl, but every good player on the defense has gone down with injury, and without Gronkowski, I don't think that the offense is going to be able to put up 24 points with any predictability.