Even with a male character, Stellar blade was really a fun and enjoyable and beautiful game. The beauty of Eve and even Raven are just icing on the cake.I hope now ppl can stop saying Stellar Blade was only popular because it had a hot character. A hot character can make a good game more pleasing but it does not turn a bad game into a good one. These devs never made a good game, and a hot character did not saved another one.
Stellar Blade was indeed a actual fun and great game. And was actually worth it to day 1.Even with a male character, Stellar blade was really a fun and enjoyable and beautiful game. The beauty of Eve and even Raven are just icing on the cake.
Yeah general rule is to skip Dreamcastguy, but in this very specific case I wanted to eat popcorn and watch someone eviscerate a game I knew would be bad.That's a lot of soy in that thumbnail, makes it easy to see what videos to skip
Who are these retards? They wouldn't know a good game even if it hit em.I hope now ppl can stop saying Stellar Blade was only popular because it had a hot character.
Just play The Killing Antidote. It is horny survival horror except it's actually good from a Chinese indie team.
This should be every single person's sig.I hope now ppl can stop saying Stellar Blade was only popular because it had a hot character.
It was never going to be released on PC because the developers are PlayStation fanboy retards. Their last game they pulled the same shit with Xbox and started a bunch of fanboy wars on Twitter over it. This game they pretended it was to protect the "actress" but it was really because they're your average Twitter PS trolls who just happen to know a bit, albeit a small bit, about making video games.This is a game that should have been released on PC as I don't think it's going to sell on consoles.
A statement that I immediately found very odd, given that the main character runs around half naked..!This game they pretended it was to protect the "actress"
Code Violet reviewed by Jarrett Green on PlayStation 5.
Code Violet is not the Dino Crisis successor you may have hoped for. It doesn't even clear the bar of being a successful clone of the various other third-person shooters it cribs most of its ideas from. Its dated map layouts and visual style let its predecessors down. The only weight I felt from its convoluted story and flat, empty characters were on my eyelids. Its anemic host of enemies are dull, and far more scary are the amount of bugs that were in this review build that, though a priority on developer TeamKill Media's list of fixes, hit Code Violet's balance and pacing like a life-ending comet from outer space.
It was never going to be released on PC because the developers are PlayStation fanboy retards. Their last game they pulled the same shit with Xbox and started a bunch of fanboy wars on Twitter over it. This game they pretended it was to protect the "actress" but it was really because they're your average Twitter PS trolls who just happen to know a bit, albeit a small bit, about making video games.
Anyone who was looking forward to this game clearly didn't understand who was making it, and if they did know they got what they deserved.
It's actually smart. They courted the twitter warrior audience successfully. OP ate that shit up hook line and sinker.
![]()
"fun, exciting and beautiful"
because of the platform exclusivity.
![]()
People should expect more from games than just a hot babe in panties with shit level design and shit game play.
If you look at the posts he made, that wasn't his reason."fun, exciting and beautiful"
because of the platform exclusivity.
![]()
TheRadBrad seems to enjoy it.
Stellar Blade was/is a prime example that gameplay always comes first over looks. Eve's looks were just the cherry on top.I hope now ppl can stop saying Stellar Blade was only popular because it had a hot character. A hot character can make a good game more pleasing but it does not turn a bad game into a good one. These devs never made a good game, and a hot character did not saved another one.
You're right. It worked. They were the number one pre-order on PSN, and they did it by duping console warriors to buy their game specifically because it was "exclusive".It's actually smart. They courted the twitter warrior audience successfully. OP ate that shit up hook line and sinker.
Sony was banking the entire generation on it.I didn't even know about this game until I saw this thread, it looks terrible. Sony didn't pay for exclusivity or promote it, did they? lol
Does it deserve one?Why doesn't the game have a dedicated review thread?
They publish on Playstation only because they know it has the most difficult refund system to deal with.I didn't even know about this game until I saw this thread, it looks terrible. Sony didn't pay for exclusivity or promote it, did they? lol
Sony has nothing to do with it.This can't be a Sony published game?
What is this?
No. Devs choose only to publish on ps this shit, like their previous game because you cant get refunds that easy.I didn't even know about this game until I saw this thread, it looks terrible. Sony didn't pay for exclusivity or promote it, did they? lol
Real nextgen experience.This can't be a Sony published game?
What is this?
Sony has nothing to do with it.
TheRadBrad seems to enjoy it.
The PS fanboys are predictably coming out to run defence for any scathing criticism of it. "Must ... defend ... anything ... associated with .... plastic box."
The only reason I know this is that there aren't more than 5 Code Violet fans.
Didn't IGN give Alien Isolation a 6.5 and Godhand a 3, yet Concord got a 7 and while I liked the game, DA:Vanguard got a 9? I'm sure Code Violet definitely has it's issues, but I think after a few patches, it could end up being a solid game. Is it at least better than Quantum Error?
Would have saved us six years wasted on tears of the kingdom.I wish platform holders had some form of standards that prevented shitty asset flips like this.