boiled goose
good with gravy
Worried about this now as reviews are lower than Skyfall
GAF is so weird with revisionist history.. QoS was hated so much at the time.. Now, "it's actually pretty good!" My take on it hasn't really changed, it's decent as a part 2 of Casino Royale, but it's horribly fragmented and really needed more time in the oven.
Vesper Lynd should be the lowest on any lost looks-wise. But character wise with depth and all that, she's probably the best.
Olga Kurylenko is probably my favorite.
Well I'm perfectly fine with a four-part character study on the man at this point.
I get people wanting to ease up on making the movies less about Bond, but then I think of the Mission Impossible movies: really fun, slick, well-made spy action films. But who the fuck is Ethan Hunt? Absolutely no one. There's no real character to Hunt, not much of an arc to him, he's just Tom Cruise -- which is fine, but also makes the movies somewhat forgettable for me. Whereas something like Quantum of Solace, despite being a demonstrably sloppier and half-baked movie compared to any MI (except 2), has more bite to it because of its focus on and development of Bond's character arc. His anger over Vesper, or scenes like Mathis' death, resonate more strongly with me than virtually anything in the MI series even if those movies are technically better. And I feel the same about a lot of the pre-Craig Bonds too.
Unpopular opinion: I thought OHMSS was kind of bad (and not that out of step from Moore's films), and its character development fairly overhyped -- there's much ado about the Bond/Tracy relationship, but she's absent for like the entire middle section of the film!
I think the only pre-Craig movies that had something interesting to say about the man were Thunderball and Goldeneye (and maybe License to Kill? can't remember).
.
Because one or two people like it that means everyone does?
Its a bad movie..only good parts are the Vesper related scraps (Mr. white, the opera, Mathis and the ending). It doesnt play or feel like the back half of Casino Royale. It feels like an epilogue cut into pieces and spread throughout the Bond on a dumb luck mission formula (come on...20 dollars bills trace to some guy in Haiti who JUST used them).
The opening of Quantum should have been Bond having already got the info from Mr. White goes and finds the Algerian and kills him and then Bond can be Bond after the song and credits. Casino Royale started low key, it could be done again. There was no reason to drag out the Vesper "revenge". Its really not that important in the bigger 22 film picture.
-EDIT-
By the way I think Bond deserves some character and some pathos. But its overkill now. He shouldnt be like every modern movie hero where it was his destiny to be part of the villains evil plans.
I actually really enjoyed Quantum in the end with more repeated viewings. In the beginning I was disappointed at first I admit, but once you piece it together as directly sequel to CR, it actually turns out pretty decent. Now Skyfall on the other hand. . . Nope.
I like Qunatum of Solace more than most people here it seems, but I really didn't like the fact that it's an immediate sequel to Casino Royale.
I totally didn't get it on first viewing by the way, I mean, Bond cold opening usually involve people that you don't know, and it's not like Mr. White had this huge memorable role in the previous film.
I also didn't think they did anything super interesting with it, like, the same plot could've been achieved without that, it just would've made the start of the movie less confusing.
I do agree with you on the editing, it's fucking terrible, and it's a shame since I think the film has one of the strongest scripts of any of the Bond movies.
Quantum of Solace is one of the best Bond movies (which doesn't say a lot) but it was a very solid entry in the franchise. Totally digged it, and it was by far superior to Skyfall. I hope Spectre can compete with Quantum of Solace, as I will be fine if it isn't on par with Casino Royale.
Quantum is a top 10 Bond, easily. I still don't know why people hate it. It's essentially the second half of CR and it will be looked upon fondly in a few years, much like OHMSS has.
Better than skyfall that's for damn sure.
No such person exists.
Perhaps a malfunctioning android might feel that way, but no human being is capable of such dark, twisted thoughts.
Worried about this now as reviews are lower than Skyfall
There is a lot more now than when QoS came out. I remember terms like "worst Bond film ever" when it came out. Some quotes just from this page re: QoS.
I can understand people not thinking Skyfall was the best Bond, but QoS better than it?
![]()
Similar to the Bond and Friends comment, the time is coming where we need a story that isn't a personal character study for Bond (we've had Origin, Revenge, and two Personal Missions in a row now) but a story where he's injected into it and has his character moments but the world isn't revolving around him. Similarly the MI6 characters would be spun away from the plot as part of this. Basically, we need a more formulaic 'here's your mission, off you go' structure soon. I think the time has come again.
I absolutely love CR and Skyfall. Must have watched both 3-4 times each, maybe more over the years, especially after I bought the steelbook blu-rays of each. That said I wasn't too keen on QoS. To those who have seen it, is it closer in quality, plot and pacing to CS and Skyfall, or QoS?
I think I have read so many different impressions from all kind of fans of different "Bond styles", I am really really confused now..
For people who have seen it, a question.
Is Monica Bellucci revealed to be Blofeld?
The MI comparison is interesting because I think they're nailing the "fun" aspect. Someone said (on a podcast I think) recently that the MI movies were the best "Old school Bond" movies in the last few decades. I don't think that's a hundred percent accurate, since that series has its own set of tropes that aren't really in line with Bond, but I wouldn't be unhappy if I found out that the producers were taking some notes from them.
Lame. There goes my only reason to watch this.
I don't know how the action in Spectre is or if there is anything memorable...
My review for Spectre.. not at good as Moonraker.
Literally watched Spectre a little over a hour ago and I can't remember anything memorable action wise.
My review for Spectre.. not at good as Moonraker.
Vesper Lynd should be the lowest on any lost looks-wise. But character wise with depth and all that, she's probably the best.
Olga Kurylenko is probably my favorite.
for the record, meus really liked the new fantastic four movie. so much so that he tried shilling tickets for it to people who hadn't seen it yet.
Damn, can't believe how much of a "classic" bond feel Spectre had throughout. Was damn good. Easily one of the best in the series IMO. Obviously opinions seem to be all over the place - but anyhow I loved it, speaking as someone who's favourite Bond films are FRWL, OHMSS, TSWLM and the Living Daylights.
for the record, meus really liked the new fantastic four movie. so much so that he tried shilling tickets for it to people who hadn't seen it yet.
the train fight scene really is fantastic, probably the best hand to hand fight scene in any bond film i've seen.
baptista
for the record, meus really liked the new fantastic four movie. so much so that he tried shilling tickets for it to people who hadn't seen it yet.
THE LEAKS WERE TRUE!?
Lies.
What leaks?
Sony leaks from last year.