Kabuki Waq
Member
http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3144973
good stuff guys. Damn both those games are looking awesome.
good stuff guys. Damn both those games are looking awesome.
I thought the dev said they were using AA.pxleyes said:I just played CoD, and while good overall, it is hardly amazing.
No AA filtering, at all. In fact, games with no AA look better on my laptop with a GF4. The game does looks good overall, better than the PC version, but not as much of a leap as I saw in the screens they were showing. It was smooth though, I will give them that.
dorio said:I thought the dev said they were using AA.
chespace said:It looks WAY BETTER on the Xbox 360 than it does on the PC. I just looked at both versions today and you can see a clear difference in technical quality.
pxleyes said:Unfortunately its still a port... A true CoD on the 360 will be much better down the line.
chespace said:Dude, I am weak at the knees for Brothers in Arms. I fucking LOVED Earned in Blood.
BIA with Unreal 3.... drooool.
binaryburrito said:Not true... both the PC and the X360 game engines were built simulataneously from the ground up to take advantage of each platform's strengths.
pxleyes said:Wow, thats sad if true. I really expected more after playing it in person. Still, most fun demo to play and good action...just not as jaw-dropping as I wanted.
chespace said:Dude, I am weak at the knees for Brothers in Arms. I fucking LOVED Earned in Blood.
BIA with Unreal 3.... drooool.
krypt0nian said:Hell they talk any more about Condemned and we would've heard the whole ending...
chespace said:This is true. I hear Condemned is rather short. Exaggerated tales put it at somewhere around the 6 hour range. I dunno, that sounds like an Xtreme Speedrun to me.
chespace said:Dude, I am weak at the knees for Brothers in Arms. I fucking LOVED Earned in Blood.
BIA with Unreal 3.... drooool.
I believe you che, but there was virtually no difference between the PC demo (at highest details) when compared to the XBOX360 shots from the same areas. Of course, if the 360 version truly does run at 60 fps (it does, right?)...it will be the one to buy.chespace said:It looks WAY BETTER on the Xbox 360 than it does on the PC. I just looked at both versions today and you can see a clear difference in technical quality.
phantomile co. said:Sl1p works for them?!
it sorta all makes sense now... fuck that noise.
Essell1up.Kabuki Waq said:who is Sl1p?
dark10x said:I believe you che, but there was virtually no difference between the PC demo (at highest details) when compared to the XBOX360 shots from the same areas. Of course, if the 360 version truly does run at 60 fps (it does, right?)...it will be the one to buy.
element said:not enough condemned talk!
It sure was 60 fps at X05. Btw I hear this game was the first 360 game to be sent for manufacturing, with retail copies being available for the publisher next week.dark10x said:I believe you che, but there was virtually no difference between the PC demo (at highest details) when compared to the XBOX360 shots from the same areas. Of course, if the 360 version truly does run at 60 fps (it does, right?)...it will be the one to buy.
chespace said:This is true. I hear Condemned is rather short. Exaggerated tales put it at somewhere around the 6 hour range. I dunno, that sounds like an Xtreme Speedrun to me.
Kimi said:I've heard 4 hours. If I'm remembering correctly.