There is no difference between JPG and PNG.... People in this thread need to get a grip.
NO DIFFERENCE - stop perpetrating that idiotic notion.
Joke post? Or are you actually clueless about lossless compression vs lossy compression?
Joke post? Or are you actually clueless about lossless compression vs lossy compression?
Please tell me that's the frame rate in the corner.
Please tell me that's the frame rate in the corner.
Are you not entertained?
Ow, it wasn't supposed to be displayed but yes, that's my frame rate.
I'm "playing" on an old laptop (i7 Q740M - GTX460M). :/
Ow, it wasn't supposed to be displayed but yes, that's my frame rate.
I'm "playing" on an old laptop (i7 Q740M - GTX460M). :/
New thread.
Wow
Much excited
There is no difference between JPG and PNG.... People in this thread need to get a grip.
NO DIFFERENCE - stop perpetrating that idiotic notion.
http://abload.de/img/crazy-laughter7asez.gif
great shots :P[/QUOTE]
Thanks. :)
[quote="Spazznid, post: 95473339"]To be honest, I've never seen an FPS counter that needed to differentiate between FPS by decibels... I... I'm sorry, guy.
I know that pain, Used to have a shit PC. Then one day, I saved up all my money, and paid for a hooker. Now look at me, livin' life.
On a serious note, I DID have a crappy PC and I remember where I came from. Every time I get a new piece of hardware, I try to see how low I can make my FPS in Half-Life 2 go. Right now, I play Cinematic Mod, at 4K, with 8xSGSSAA, and forced Ambient Occlusion highest setting, and can get down to 20-30. There's got to be something more I can do...
Also, whilst playing Warframe at 4K, I was getting angry at how sluggish it felt. The framerate seemed like it was going at a dead slug's pace. I looked at my Fraps Counter and it was at 60 fps. I'm finally at that point where going so low as 60 fps can bother me during gameplay. I think it was Sethos who initially got me interested in 120+ fps, when he said "Once you go 120fps, you can't go back." I mean I can go to the single digits while screenshotting, but gameplay must be at 100+ or I'll feel like it's low.
More Warframe!
[IMG]http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3814/11684548093_ea041a3681_o.png
[IMG]http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3698/11684290575_c274f98ef5_o.png[/QUOTE]
I'm planning to upgrade my desktop computer but it's all I can do for now. :/
Those shots of Warframe are great!
Those are really nice.I'll start my year off with some Assassin's Creed 4.
That depends on the image content. Anything from not smaller at all to a factor of 100 or more. Generally probably around factor 3 for most screenshots.So how much smaller is a PNG file compared to BMP? My last BMP pics in the previous thread came out at 10MB.
So how much smaller is a PNG file compared to BMP? My last BMP pics in the previous thread came out at 10MB.
I hate the banner
That depends on the image content. Anything from not smaller at all to a factor of 100 or more. Generally probably around factor 3 for most screenshots.
There's no reason to use bmp.
you can compress a png just like jpg if you wanted. So it depends.. jpgs can have variable compression rates as well as no compression at all which a lot of people do not know..
The file size of either does not dictate the actual size in memory.
There isn't just no noticeable quality loss, there is no quality loss at all. PNG is a lossless compression format, like a zip file. (outside of lossy png compressors, whic hare very rare)So I assume PNG files are smaller, and there is no (notable) quality loss from BMP? I was informed there is a PNG output option in Fraps which I'll be using from now.