TheKaeptain
Banned
All that smog is damaging your eyes
Completely unbiased unlike you since the Ducks are playing your team.
All that smog is damaging your eyes
I missed it but apparently HNIC said something about Gallagher being good despite what analytics say?
well that's funny because Gallagher is heavily supported by analytics
Completely unbiased unlike you since the Ducks are playing your team.
that was definitely interference ...
That far out of the crease though? He was a few feet outside the blue paint.
Now THAT is interference, can't be in the paint like that.
Silfverberg was kinda just skating by. Also Kesler earlier was just skating by.
it doesn't matter if you're just skating by...
should be disallow, no penalty
"69.4
Contact Outside the Goal Crease
-
If an attacking player initiates any contact with a goalkeeper, other than incidental contact, while the goalkeeper is outside his goal crease, and a goal is scored, the goal will be disallowed. A goalkeeper is not fair game just because he is outside the goal crease. The appropriate penalty should be assessed in every case where an attacking player makes unnecessary contact with the goalkeeper. However, incidental contact will be permitted when the goalkeeper is in the act of playing the puck outside his goal crease provided the attacking player has made a reasonable effort to avoid such unnecessary contact. When a goalkeeper has played the puck outside of his crease and is then prevented from returning to his crease area due to the deliberate actions of an attacking player, such player may be penalized for goalkeeper interference. Similarly, the goalkeeper may be penalized, if by his actions outside of his crease he deliberately interferes with an attacking player who is attempting to play the puck or an opponent."
this is why i really want the coach's challenge
Your rule disagrees with you - it's very easy to argue the contact was outside the crease was a result of Crawford reaching out as much as silvferberg skating by, making it incidental contact.