• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

[538] There Were No Purple* States On Tuesday

Status
Not open for further replies.

dramatis

Member
*At least, no states split their Senate-presidential vote for the first time ever.

From Harry Enten.
The 2016 Senate elections were the most nationalized ever.

The amount of straight-ticket voting was unusual even for the highly polarized era we live in. Four years ago, for example, Democratic Senate candidates won in some states where President Obama lost by healthy margins, including Indiana, Missouri and North Dakota. Republicans, meanwhile, held their seat in Nevada even though Mitt Romney lost there by 7 percentage points.

Nothing like that happened this year. Instead, one of the clearest trends in recent American politics — growing polarization and partisanship — accelerated. Most voters have sorted themselves into two camps: liberal Democrats and conservative Republicans. This trend is apparent up and down the ballot to a degree that we’ve never seen before.

Indeed, this is the first time that all the states (with Senate races on the ballot) have voted for the same party in both the presidential and Senate races. Senators were first popularly elected in 1914, and the next presidential election took place two years later, in 1916. So that’s 100 years and 26 presidential election cycles in all. You’d have to go back to 1920 to come even close to seeing anything like it. In that election, the only state that didn’t vote for the same party in the presidential and Senate race was Kentucky. It chose Republican Richard Ernst for Senate by less than 1 percentage point and Democrat James Cox for president, also by less than 1 point.
It's quite clear the country is more polarized than ever. Fun times.
 

Geist-

Member
I blame the extreme hyperbole that every political commentator and politician seems to be using for a while now. Of course people are going to become diehard supporters of whatever party they support if everyone is telling them the opposition will destroy their way of life and the End is Nigh if they get elected.
 
That might actually be a good way to explain voter apathy. If people are just going Left! Right! Left! Right! Left! Right!, with no room in the middle you're probably going to tire out real quick. Then again, the US doesn't really have a left party, so perhaps the time is to actually form one. At least millennials might show up for that one.
 

kirblar

Member
That might actually be a good way to explain voter apathy. If people are just going Left! Right! Left! Right! Left! Right!, with no room in the middle you're probably going to tire out real quick. Then again, the US doesn't really have a left party, so perhaps the time is to actually form one. At least millennials might show up for that one.
Young people never show up.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom