Adolescence on Netflix is the best TV series I've seen in years

Lt Pidgeon

Neo Member
I haven't watched the show nor really read anything about it, so I don't know if it's supposed to re-enact a specific event or be completely fictionalized. But reading some of the posts in here praising the main star's acting, this could just be a case of them simply settling for the best young adolescent male they encountered during auditions, regardless of his race. Perhaps the show doesn't reflect the actual statistical reality of the behavior showcased in the program, but it's possible they literally just hired the best actor for the job and created the story around him.

Yes, because that is how these things work. :D
 

IDKFA

I am Become Bilbo Baggins
Why did they race-swap him then? I'm curious to see how you'll spin this one.


In this case he was actually black though.

No, mate. This show was written and in production when that tragic event happened.

They were not inspired by this event.

The event you're referring to was a twisted fuck killing young girls at a Taylor Swift dance event. The story in this show is totally different.
 

offtopic

He measures in centimeters
It was okay, but the hype around it has gotten out of control. I feel like there is an issue the show writers want to address, but they're going about in the wrong way.

The Prime Minister has now been seriously discussing how this show can help the government to improve online safety. However, he doesn't want to employ a Minister for Men, even though we have a Minister for Women?

The co-writer of the show and star Stephen Graham have even accepted an invitation to a parliamentary meeting by Labour MP Josh McAlister to discuss online safety with MPs. I'm worried that this will give the government further powers to tackle free speech, something this country already lacks.

I agree young boys need better role models. Andre Tate should not be a role model for any young boy or any man for that matter. Men need real role models.

However, incels are no where near the biggest problem facing our country and I'm a little surprised a fictional TV show is driving political agenda.

Second, if we have misogy laws then bring in misandry laws. Why doesn't anyone talk about how male suicide rates are far greater then women? Why are women allowed to body shame men without consequences (hahaha small dick! Sorry, I only want men over 6ft) but men who (wrongfully) do the same are treated like criminals? Women are allowed safe spaces where no men are allowed, but men can't have men only spaces? Women are allowed to cry, but when a man cries he's a pussy?! Stop demonising men and lets talk about real equality.

And how about talking about how white, working class boys are the most disadvantaged group in the UK.


We do have a problem with young boys in the UK, but we're not looking at the full root cause.

Also, I understand this post might get me into trouble. Apologies if so. I just want boys and men in this country to be treated better so we can all live a better life. This isn't about any political party, but more to do with the how we can help young boys in the future. Peace.
US here but there is certainly a crisis with our teen age boys (father of a teen boy and teacher of 16-18yr olds). I'd highly recommend Prof. Scott Galloway and Richard Reeves as producers and articulators of the problem and the societal impacts of this problem. They basically argue that YES, we need to specifically enact policy and change societal attitudes on this issue but that we can also simultaneously champion women and that this isn't a zero sum game. However, they argue that if we fail to acknowledge this problem and fail to be become champions of these young men, that they will turn to far more toxic voices that will basically blame women for all their issues.

People who live in only a culture war mentality might see this mini-series in very specific ways but basically to me it is just shining a very bright light on a big and tragic problem. Even if it just gets parents to talk to their children about what they are doing for hours behind closed doors in their rooms that will be a step in the right direction. Back when I was growing up, having your child at home at night in their room was considered keeping them safe. Nowadays it just isn't.
 

DragoonKain

Neighbours from Hell
Incels are a real thing. Referring to them in a show about a murder isn't necessarily political. When you have young kids who commit those type of murders, there is a chance that is going to be a factor. It's only fair for law enforcement and/or the parents to wonder about it. I think they were just trying to create as real of a scenario as possible.

If I had a kid who sat in his room all day, didn't talk to anyone, and then went out and killed a girl, I'd absolutely question if my kid was an incel. It's only political if there's an overall political message they're trying to drive home, and any references to incels were detached from any messaging in particular. I think those gripes are ultra nitpicky. And being wired to look too closely for stuff in shows now because of the culture wars. There was no message of "Young white kids killing girls is a big problem in Britain today because of Andrew Tate." That would have been an agenda, but there was nothing like that in it. It was just a standalone story about a kid with serious emotional and anger issues and following the impacts of a crime through various points of view.
 
Last edited:

Sonik

Member
US here but there is certainly a crisis with our teen age boys (father of a teen boy and teacher of 16-18yr olds). I'd highly recommend Prof. Scott Galloway and Richard Reeves as producers and articulators of the problem and the societal impacts of this problem. They basically argue that YES, we need to specifically enact policy and change societal attitudes on this issue but that we can also simultaneously champion women and that this isn't a zero sum game. However, they argue that if we fail to acknowledge this problem and fail to be become champions of these young men, that they will turn to far more toxic voices that will basically blame women for all their issues.

People who live in only a culture war mentality might see this mini-series in very specific ways but basically to me it is just shining a very bright light on a big and tragic problem. Even if it just gets parents to talk to their children about what they are doing for hours behind closed doors in their rooms that will be a step in the right direction. Back when I was growing up, having your child at home at night in their room was considered keeping them safe. Nowadays it just isn't.

Regarding your last paragraph, acknowledging a problem doesn't mean it's a step towards the right direction anymore when idiots are the ones shaping the narrative and making decisions. You can quote me on this in the future, these morons' "solutions" will most probably be antagonistic towards men and will make the situation even worse
 

Represent.

Represent(ative) of bad opinions
Best child actor I've ever seen. They usually suck.

Episode 3 is a masterclass in acting, one take makes it truly special.

This is my fav show since Monster: Jeffrey Dahmer on Netflix.
 
Last edited:

Tams

Member
It's very well produced and the acting is good.

But it is overtly trying to send a flawed message and has caused a moral panic in the UK. It is therefore not to be supported.

It completely ignores that the real issue is the teaching of respect and resilience, of which there has been ever less of in the UK. There are not masses on 'incels' in the UK.
 

Tams

Member
The kid was bullied at school and gets called an incel by a bullying girl, and you guys think this is just to paint white man as bad and/or incel as bad?

First of all why would you want to think of yourself as an incel, its not a good thing.

Second why would you judge something if you have t watched it or know what its about.

I was bullied in school too but not this type of shit thankfully.

The director has done multiple interviews stating that is what it is about. 'Bullying' barely gets a mention in them.
 

John Bilbo

Member
I found the different perspectives interesting in this show. The actors and actresses did a fine job!

Even though impressive I think the show could have worked better with less use of the one shot technique as I found the pacing needlessly dragging "between" some scenes.

The show would have benefitted from losing the ham-fisted messaging, especially in the fourth episode.
 
It's very well produced and the acting is good.

But it is overtly trying to send a flawed message and has caused a moral panic in the UK. It is therefore not to be supported.

It completely ignores that the real issue is the teaching of respect and resilience, of which there has been ever less of in the UK. There are not masses on 'incels' in the UK.
Correct. The UK has been experiencing rising amounts of violent knife attacks, including among teens. This show attempts to scapegoat “incel culture” as the particular reason for the violence and ignores other very obvious factors that are inconvenient to the narrative it wants to present. It’s hard to read it as anything other than disguised propaganda.

That said, I found this to be boring. The one style is impressive but doesn’t do much to create a compelling story.
 
Last edited:

Lt Pidgeon

Neo Member
It's very well produced and the acting is good.

But it is overtly trying to send a flawed message and has caused a moral panic in the UK. It is therefore not to be supported.

It completely ignores that the real issue is the teaching of respect and resilience, of which there has been ever less of in the UK. There are not masses on 'incels' in the UK.

Respect and resilience are key words there. Especially when you see the school environment the kids are in with the ineffective teachers and LGBT bullshit instead of actually instilling some respect in them.
 

Tams

Member
Respect and resilience are key words there. Especially when you see the school environment the kids are in with the ineffective teachers and LGBT bullshit instead of actually instilling some respect in them.

And if the teachers are 'strong', it's often a middle-aged woman lecturing them or a middle-aged male trying to be 'cool'.
Both are either ineffective or actively harmful.

This drama is just going to see a load of teenage boys be lectured, likely by middle-aged women. I've already seen some of it recently. You can see the teenagers rolling their eyes and having a snigger at the teachers.
 

Sonik

Member
don't bother they just move on to the next thing they can find that will validate their beliefs. There's never a readjustment of their worldview. Rip

Knife crime in schools is still an immigration problem, UK was nothing like this 30+ years ago and the stats prove it. Even if they were just inspired by other real events, they're deliberately trying to shape the narrative in a specific way to make it all about incels and white men bad as per usual even though it has very little to do with that
 
Last edited:

TrebleShot

Member
I thought this show was terrible.

The one shot thing is impressive but means they linger on things and repeat the same point over and over.


I thought the acting and writing was secondary school GCSE drama exam level. Absolutely awful.

They talk about incel culture but only go surface level and don't explore some of the more dangerous and detailed aspects they simply say it's a thing and its bad.


Once again social media hype and the lack of real quality ut there means things like this float to the top.
 

Lt Pidgeon

Neo Member
I thought this show was terrible.

The one shot thing is impressive but means they linger on things and repeat the same point over and over.


I thought the acting and writing was secondary school GCSE drama exam level. Absolutely awful.

They talk about incel culture but only go surface level and don't explore some of the more dangerous and detailed aspects they simply say it's a thing and its bad.


Once again social media hype and the lack of real quality ut there means things like this float to the top.

They didn't even fully explore the extent of the bullying that the boy might have been receiving.

When was the last time there was an "incel murder" in the UK? It's not a thing, far less something that deserves a Netflix show about it. They are absolutely deflecting on the reasons for knife crime.
 

TrebleShot

Member
They didn't even fully explore the extent of the bullying that the boy might have been receiving.

When was the last time there was an "incel murder" in the UK? It's not a thing, far less something that deserves a Netflix show about it. They are absolutely deflecting on the reasons for knife crime.
Im not sure on the deflection tactics, but I just think the quality is shite, I cant believe how bad the acting is.

Episode 3 abysmal TV
 

TrebleShot

Member
Agreed. Between the wee boy going from being a meek 13 year old to being a psychopath, and then the terrible acting of the psychologist.
HA yeah this episode cemented it for me that it was just another UK BBC / ITV produced show with basic writing and crappy acting.

Also look I know Graham is a good actor, not amazing, but flaring nostrils and being frustrated isn't award worthy.
 

BlackTron

Member
I have heard it is good, but the real story that it is based on had the main character race swapped. I guess Netflix did not want to present a black youth as the assailant.

You seem like a pretty fair and reasonable dude, so this feels like a good opportunity to show your tendency to lean into a certain flavor kool-aid, without any bad intent.

It goes both ways. Yesterday, a friend reposted a Twitter screenshot that claimed the SSA loans to babies aren't loans, they're survivor benefits and he's literally stealing from orphans. I had to point out that they are SBA loans, not SSA payments. The original source of the claim on Twitter, likely, had no bad intent and was simply not smart enough to parse the difference between SBA and SSA.

I believe Musk is legitimately factually bad enough without having to claim he steals directly from orphans. We create moral equivalency by using the same disinformation tactics.
 

AJUMP23

Parody of actual AJUMP23
You seem like a pretty fair and reasonable dude, so this feels like a good opportunity to show your tendency to lean into a certain flavor kool-aid, without any bad intent.

It goes both ways. Yesterday, a friend reposted a Twitter screenshot that claimed the SSA loans to babies aren't loans, they're survivor benefits and he's literally stealing from orphans. I had to point out that they are SBA loans, not SSA payments. The original source of the claim on Twitter, likely, had no bad intent and was simply not smart enough to parse the difference between SBA and SSA.

I believe Musk is legitimately factually bad enough without having to claim he steals directly from orphans. We create moral equivalency by using the same disinformation tactics.

I agree sometimes the narratives on the socials are just trying to start something. I could enjoy the show even if there is race swapping.

I WILL TRY TO BE MORE UNREASONABLE!!
 

DeafTourette

Perpetually Offended
The story in the series is NOT based on a single true story and was filming WHEN the murder happened... There was no race swap.

Stop believing Elon Musk every time he says something to rile you up!
I agree sometimes the narratives on the socials are just trying to start something. I could enjoy the show even if there is race swapping.

I WILL TRY TO BE MORE UNREASONABLE!!
 

Bojji

Member
So I finished it yesterday.

Most of the actors were really good but some performances were not so great.

Series is really well done and there is some impressive cinematography on display that's for sure.

That said the most important thing - Story is super simple and not really explored. Series focuses on feelings of characters more than storyline.

I think it could be done in 2 episodes or one movie, 50% of stuff is not important and just fills screentime.

I think it's ok but clearly over hyped.
 
Last edited:

kruis

Exposing the sinister cartel of retailers who allow companies to pay for advertising space.
It's very well produced and the acting is good.

But it is overtly trying to send a flawed message and has caused a moral panic in the UK. It is therefore not to be supported.

It completely ignores that the real issue is the teaching of respect and resilience, of which there has been ever less of in the UK. There are not masses on 'incels' in the UK.

Good point about the moral panic about kids using social media. See this article.

 

12Goblins

Lil’ Gobbie
I wish we could have little flags next to our names I think its interesting to see peoples different perspectives on different issues

maybe in the UK the show is being over hyped but in US nobody is talking about it so it's a nice surprise when netflix finally produces a show that is technically well made, contains powerful subject matter, and has top notch acting
 

pachura

Member
Episodes 1-2 were great police procedurals (reminded me of Broadchurch season 3 opening with a procedure of reporting being raped)
Episode 3 was Primal Fear-wannabe
Episode 4 was boring

Acting was great and I liked the tiny twist about emoticons and heart icon colors, but overall the story was lacking.
Why a colleague had to deliver him a kitchen knife?
Also, I thought UK had the most CCTV cameras per square meter, why would you let yourself get recorded?
 

diffusionx

Gold Member
I haven't watched the show nor really read anything about it, so I don't know if it's supposed to re-enact a specific event or be completely fictionalized. But reading some of the posts in here praising the main star's acting, this could just be a case of them simply settling for the best young adolescent male they encountered during auditions, regardless of his race. Perhaps the show doesn't reflect the actual statistical reality of the behavior showcased in the program, but it's possible they literally just hired the best actor for the job and created the story around him.
crazy that people would argue this in 2025.
 

offtopic

He measures in centimeters
Just saying it's a possibility. Didn't think that would be so controversial or even remarkable.
Most likely scenario is the Stephen Graham both runs the studio and was always going to play the lead male (dad) role and he is white. Then you fill in casting around that. I do think that is a mistake to only look at the show being only specifically about incels and knife violence. I looked at it as a tragedy of the declining mental health of men (and adolescent and young men specifically). As a teacher and dad it isn't too hard to see that young men are really struggling (tons of data and reasons on this if you want to google up richard reeves or scott galloway). Obviously Jamie had to have even more going on than that to do what he did and we could see glimpses of that demon at times throughout the show (especially ep 3).
 

MMaRsu

Gold Member

Poppinfresh

Neo Member
found it super boring. finished 3 episodes and didnt even care to watch the 4th, its a bratty fucking kid and thats about it. The filming in 1 shot is cool...for 1 episode then it just makes it drag .
Same.


The first episode was decent, but then I was bored to tears. I made it halfway through episode 3 and started to fast-forward.
 

S0ULZB0URNE

Member
First two episodes were ok.
Last two were terrible as was the way it ending.

Found out who it was based on compared to who they used to play the boy....

Big yikes!
 

JackHanma

Neo Member
"White boys bad" the television show. Astroturfed by the UK government despite the fact its make believe... The same UK government that denied investigations into grooming gangs because that's wacist. Also, what is with the people online defending this show like it is their job? LOL show sucks.
 
Last edited:

Tams

Member
Most likely scenario is the Stephen Graham both runs the studio and was always going to play the lead male (dad) role and he is white. Then you fill in casting around that. I do think that is a mistake to only look at the show being only specifically about incels and knife violence. I looked at it as a tragedy of the declining mental health of men (and adolescent and young men specifically). As a teacher and dad it isn't too hard to see that young men are really struggling (tons of data and reasons on this if you want to google up richard reeves or scott galloway). Obviously Jamie had to have even more going on than that to do what he did and we could see glimpses of that demon at times throughout the show (especially ep 3).

And yet, in the greatest debating chamber in the country (that shall not be named here), the take away was young boys potentially very bad, (Andrew Tate, Andrew Tate, Andrew Tate...), and 'we need to tackle incels'.

Not the bullying or the root causes of extreme crime in young boys.

Ans of course, they haven't dared touch on the role of race and different cultures (but hey, think of all the different food).
 
Last edited:

Dacvak

No one shall be brought before our LORD David Bowie without the true and secret knowledge of the Photoshop. For in that time, so shall He appear.
Just binged the whole series and it was great. That last episode was just so sad… I’ve got a good friend from high school who committed murder and is serving life, and I’ve seen a small bit of that destruction first-hand.

The acting in this show was just incredible. And while the episodes certainly didn’t need to be one continuous shot, I thought it was wildly impressive that they were able to pull that off. Especially episode 2.

Anyway, definitely a great little series. Absolutely worth watching.
 
Top Bottom