• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Albert Penello puts dGPU Xbox One rumor to rest

Status
Not open for further replies.
that's the exact same as drive club being 1080p @ 30fps and using graphical effects as an explanation. They're both just opposite sides of a design-choice coin

Okay, I totally understand that. Im satisfied.

I suppose we wont really have an understanding on how much the power gap matters for at least a couple years. That being said, Deep Down and Infamous SS are noticeably better looking than any of the announced X1 titles, visually speaking. Those games have the same effect Fight Night and Ghost Recon did last generation. That "holy shit this is the next level!" feeling.
 
Oh trust me, there can be big differences. Amount of calcium, acid, alkali etc can all effect taste. For example, I dislike Nestle, Dasani and Volvic mineral water, and really like Buxtons, Evian and Highland Spring.

Really? I just take the first I see and be done with it. I've never tasted a bottled water that I'd say: Man this is some quality ass water right here.

Not saying there isn't a difference.
 
lol, these are the posts that make reading gaf such a pleasure.

lol, I can't help but be passionate about my favorite hobby. I just find it baffling as to why MS can't shift the focus to talking about the games and services instead of power battles and specs.
 
MdsuCAK.png

Exactly.

Guess who should we believe, lol
 
Okay, I totally understand that. Im satisfied.

I suppose we wont really have an understanding on how much the power gap matters for at least a couple years. That being said, Deep Down and Infamous SS are noticeably better looking than any of the announced X1 titles, visually speaking. Those games have the same effect Fight Night and Ghost Recon did last generation. That "holy shit this is the next level!" feeling.
I don't think we've seen enough of Deep Down to say it's noticeable better looking than any of the announced Xbone titles.

That little bit of ustream or niconico footage we got a day ago certainly isn't enough to make a statement either way.
(And gameplay to gameplay should be the comparison. Or in-engine real-time to in-engine realtime.)
 
This is the path Microsoft has taken since May 21st. It boggles my mind how off and out of touch with the consumer one company can be.

Yep if I start typing all the things they are doing wrong with PR it will be one huge ass essay. It boggles the mind really.
 
This, above all others, is a fair discussion. We have to prove out that value, I agree. I don't mind at all having that debate and I'm using the product a lot and believe in that value.

But on the other point (about power) I don't want to acquiesce a feature if I don't have to. The $100 is real and it's our job to make it worth it. The power thing isn't true, hence why I bring it up.

The problem is that you made a technical claim (power difference isn't true), without providing a technical explanation.

There are GPU inefficiencies, yet no data to support this. Directly contradicted by taking time to look at a graph of SLI/crossfire scaling.

You can add the RAM bandwidths. No explanation of a scenario where all the bandwidth can be used at once.

Your programmers are competent, yet no explanation of why they're better than PS4 programmers. Moreover, Xbox programmers were never accused of incompetence.

The problem is that you wanted to come in and dispute technical claims with conclusions and no data that led to those conclusions.
 
Not that simple. Depends on development schedule, budget and priority. Eg, say a particular dev has had to show off x version of a game at E3, Gamescom etc. A team will have had to polish that up especially for public viewing, and thus that platform may enjoy some visual benefits or be further down the line in development than the other. That and the devs will still be getting to grips with the hardware, tools and optimisations.

Add to that, people don't realise that before January 2013, PS4 dev kits only had 4GB of GDDR5 ram in them, and 6 months before that, they had only 2GB of ram in them. So devs have actually had far less than 8GB of GDDR5 to work with for the majority of the PS4 launch games development cycle.

I guess we'll have to wait and see.

Yeah of course there will always be other variables, but let's be honest here, looking at first party studios; neither Evolution, Guerilla or Sucker Punch are amateur programmers, they created some visually outstanding games on PS3 and really made the tech shine. I'm not saying their latest games don't look great because they do but not 50% better than X1 exclusive line up, nothing like imo. I understand there is an element of subjectivity there but I think if people are being honest with themselves they can see that.

The tools and optimisations are all part of this equation, an area MS feel confident they have Sony beat.
 
Well, it exists on paper and many developers said it exists in real life as well. Some even said the differences will even be apparent in launch titles.

So you come here and say "Please buy or system because we have some voodoo tech which I can't talk in detail about and ... oh ...here are some crazy numbers that don't make any sense at all... please buy our system because everyone else is lying and we will proove you".

im still waiting for him to say "oh...that bandwidth thing doesn't really work like that my bad..."
 
lol, I can't help but be passionate about my favorite hobby. I just find it baffling as to why MS can't shift the focus to talking about the games and services instead of power battles and specs.

To be fair, they have been talking about games. And showing games, and allowing people to play their games. They are only really discussing specs on these internet forums. Their main PR will never touch spec battles.

And they have been talking about their services. In fact, they revealed their system speaking about their services.
 
If I understood it correctly and you are standing by the first two bullet points you posted back in your original reply, you have just asserted that you are confident that the distributive property of mathematics is wrong:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributive_property

I believe this is now 5 posts from you narrowly focused on this. After nearly each one, Albert has posted a response that indicated he is reading posts that follow his. Yet he hasn't specifically answered you (nor many other specific criticisms/questions that have been brought up). I find your determination hilarious, but I'm starting to become concerned for your well being. It's time to take the hint, fellow gaffer.
 
This, above all others, is a fair discussion. We have to prove out that value, I agree. I don't mind at all having that debate and I'm using the product a lot and believe in that value.

But on the other point (about power) I don't want to acquiesce a feature if I don't have to. The $100 is real and it's our job to make it worth it. The power thing isn't true, hence why I bring it up.

I went and talked to my people, they confirmed to me $500 is less than $400. I trust what they are saying because they are the professionals, the 25% more expensive claims just aren't true.
 
No. I made the observation that the ps4 is the more powerful console but that the difference between the 2 isn't some massive gulf like, for example, the difference between both consoles put together and amd's current high end gear used to render all of what we've seen of bf4. I also made the observation that I've seen a lot of hypocritical posts by folks who's tones have changed from one type of thread to another. Whereas my tone has remained the same.

Fair enough on the point that you've made other observations throughout the thread, but that doesn't change what the two posts I've quoted so far said. Again, those thoughts were unnecessary, and I stand by that they were only put there for the sake of garnering a feeling of superiority over those continuing in the debates; Even if that really wasn't your intent, I don't see any other way to interpret them.

On that note, I do apologize for the tone I used in my initial reply.

That doesn't change that Albert is fudging numbers being told to him, or that the ps4 has a GPU and memory advantage or even the premise of this thread. It's simply observational commentary. (Ie if people cared this intensely about the multi platform differences that this thread is moving at a breakneck pace, there are obviously multiple ways to alleviate that need. We are an enthusiast forum after all).

I would argue that the thread's pace is primarily due to the continued feedback from a direct MS representative which intensely fuels the already contentious on-going debates on the difference in graphical capabilities between the hardware, what the developers will actually end up doing with said power, etc.
 
This is actually something I would like answered.

Penello.

Is Microsoft trying to enforce any kind of frame-rate / resolution parity policy between xbox and PS4 games next gen?

We know some of that shit went on this generation. Maybe Sony was theo one doing it to make ps3 look a little better though. No one really knows.


Please answer Penello. I would like to know.

how do you know it happened and how will they have power to make that decision?
 
these microsoft post have really got my thinking about just going to playstation. I dont care about the power of the systems, but the constant trolling they are doing is very annoying.
 
This, above all others, is a fair discussion. We have to prove out that value, I agree. I don't mind at all having that debate and I'm using the product a lot and believe in that value.

But on the other point (about power) I don't want to acquiesce a feature if I don't have to. The $100 is real and it's our job to make it worth it. The power thing isn't true, hence why I bring it up.

Well I think this says all that needs to be said. There is no way you can justify in any way the higher price point and being a weaker system. So like everything else we fall back to how amazing kinect is or will end up being. A lot of us on here(not all, but a lot) do not care what so ever about the camera and don't want it. So that extra 100 dollars is going to be a really HARD sell. Titanfall isn't enough (for me) sorry.
 
2. If it comes out after we launch that the difference between 3rd party games is maybe single-digit FPS between the two platforms, will I get an apology or concession?

You also said this:

so we took the opportunity to bump the GPU. I get it’s only 6% or so, but that could translate to a few FPS in the real world.

So a meager 6% GPU boost will net you a few FPS increase in real world huh?
 
Exactly.

Guess who should we believe, lol

1) A PR guy trying to sell us on his console
or
2) A known dev (one that worked on an 360 exclusive game no less) who has no interest at all in which platform has the beefier hardware

I know who I trust more.
 
I believe this is now 5 posts from you narrowly focused on this. After nearly each one, Albert has posted a response that indicated he is reading posts that follow his. Yet he hasn't specifically answered you. I find your determination hilarious, but I'm starting to become concerned for your well being. It's time to take the hint, fellow gaffer.

Don't feel singled out hawk2025, it's not you.
I've been ignored by Albert since July when he first said the machine with the weaker specs can end up more powerful.
 
This arm chair engineering spec war was dumb enough months ago and having MS exec's trying to save face isnt helping anyone look any better.

I do like we have a MS presence on GAF now but damn son. What are you doing wasting time with this shit?

Agree with this so damn much. I liked it better when MS was downplaying the importance of specs and they were right to a certain degree.
 
Yeah of course there will always be other variables, but let's be honest here, looking at first party studios; neither Evolution, Guerilla or Sucker Punch are amateur programmers, they created some visually outstanding games on PS3 and really made the tech shine. I'm not saying their latest games don't look great because they do but not 50% better than X1 exclusive line up, nothing like imo. I understand there is an element of subjectivity there but I think if people are being honest with themselves they can see that.

The tools and optimisations are all part of this equation, an area MS feel confident they have Sony beat.

Nah, their scrambling to make their precious box look better. Ps4 is obviously the stronger console and it will show more and more as time goes on. I will not believe those liers at Microsoft.
 
This, above all others, is a fair discussion. We have to prove out that value, I agree. I don't mind at all having that debate and I'm using the product a lot and believe in that value.

But on the other point (about power) I don't want to acquiesce a feature if I don't have to. The $100 is real and it's our job to make it worth it. The power thing isn't true, hence why I bring it up.

But it is, all you have done to try and refute it is to make a bunch of wildly inaccurate statements about scaling of graphical processing and adding RAM bandwidth (which is like claiming that because you have a speed boat and a large slow boat that the speed boat somehow can transfer 100 people at a time just because the large boat can!)
 
I believe this is now 5 posts from you narrowly focused on this. After nearly each one, Albert has posted a response that indicated he is reading posts that follow his. Yet he hasn't specifically answered you (nor many other specific criticisms/questions that have been brought up). I find your determination hilarious, but I'm starting to become concerned for your well being. It's time to take the hint, fellow gaffer.



You are right, I am being insufferable with this. It's time to give up :)

No sarcasm, by the way -- you are right, and thanks for pointing it out.
 
LOL. I actually joked the other day that I didn't want to get "Dyack'd" off the boards.

I think reasonable people understand that it's impossible for me personally to know every detail about everything with the platform. I think I got my chops busted the other day for not knowing who People Can Fly was. I haven't been paying a ton of attention to 360 over the last year or so because I've been focusing on Xbox One.

It's very frequent I have to ask questions of others and bring the answers back. I did the same thing here - went to an expert, got an answer, and brought it back.

People don't like the answer, cool, and I have absolutely no problem with questioning my specific answers or calling them into debate. That's part of the deal on here.

It's somewhat bothersome when people think you're out to just lie or fud or make it a personal thing. But again, there is no way I'd tackle this question unless I was confident from the people on the team that I'm right. Would have been a lot easier to dodge the question. And I have thick skin (literally, since I'm a big guy), so I can handle it.

So the experts you asked said to add the memory bandwidths together to give us that bus speed ?
 
This is what sets GAF apart from the n4gs and gamefaqs. Its scary and I need an adult.

Ha! :P

I mean, the questions I see here... and Penello trying to answer.... Idk, it doesn't seem fair. If they have a weaker system, there's no way he'll just come here and say "hey, our system is 50% weaker and costs $100 more... but buy our console! It's great!"... there's no way we will know before the consoles are released if the power gap is true or not... there are many aspects involved which we have no idea about... all this debate is pointless... that's just what I mean.

With all these questions and answers and people getting nervous about it, all I can see is that some people might get banned or something like that. And that's not cool :/
 
The tools and optimisations are all part of this equation, an area MS feel confident they have Sony beat.

Sony is using a very mature CPU compiler (LLVM iirc) and they no doubt have a very good shader compiler for the GPU (based off one from AMD no doubt).
 
The tools and optimisations are all part of this equation, an area MS feel confident they have Sony beat.

The Avalanche guys said a few months ago the PS4 dev tools are ahead but they are confident Microsoft will catch up. Doesn't sound like they are exactly beating them. Of course we don't know what happened since but there are no reports indicating one has an advantage over the other in this regard.
 
Wow, this thread started slow and now it's bananas. I can't believe I may be witnessing my first Dyack moment in neogaf.
 
Yeah, it is a great post. Its been their biggest obstacle and they have just run around it instead of tackling it head on. For me it has felt so forced and a clear indication that they caught wind of ps4 and reacted with what they felt would garner an audience and that was kinect and tv, tv, tv. The only thing I do agree with in their strategy is that the device needs to be in the box or it won't be developed for to the degree it needs to be successful but I just don't see there being compelling enough things to make it successful.

True. The value of Kinect has not been proven and will only really be determined through daily use and interesting games. I'm getting the Xbox One for the games, pure and simple. If Sony switched it's present and near future line up with X1's and vice versa I'd be getting a PS4. When graphics are clearly comparable, discussions about the difference in power becomes rather pointless. The only question that's worth talking about is "what kind of gaming experiences will I get out of the box".

PS4 will come later when the box has compelling games, it certainly has the power and the developers to see that through and I look forward to seeing the software that will finally make me take the plunge.
 
Nah, their scrambling to make their precious box look better. Ps4 is obviously the stronger console and it will show more and more as time goes on. I will not believe those liers at Microsoft.

Can't say I ever recall a time where MS have embellished the power of their consoles. Neither Xbox or 360 let me down on that front. Looking elsewhere though..
 
Some of your points are misleading, or otherwise need clarifying.


Graphics processing is inherently parallel, so 18 vs 12 is indeed 50% more, given the same clock rate.


Each CU being 6% faster still means only 6% speed increase overall compared to YOUR baseline, not Sony's. You can't have it both ways, Albert. Having 50% more CU is not quite 50% more GPU, but having a 6% clock speed increase is more significant than the number implies?

1.8TF > 1.3TF, to the degree that is universally understood about laws of conservation.

As some others may have pointed out, you don't just add the numbers together. At no point in time can the GPU see more than the maximum ESRAM bandwidth. Cold, hard fact.

This leads to my question. Can ESRAM sustain simultaneous read/write cycles ALL the time? If not, then how much of the time?



I would love to hear your thoughts Albert, or Technical Fellow's explanation of this post I quoted. These statements contradict nearly every number/spec breakdown that Technical Fellow shared with you.


This is personally what I would like to see a response too....

And please allow me to help out your PR department a little. 204gb/sec, according to your understanding of the number, actually implies the old clock rate of 800mhz. The new number should be 853 * 128 * 2 (simultaneous read/write per cycle) = 218gb/sec. They can thank me later.


Please do tell us more about Sony's audio chip, or do you actually not know like the rest of us?


You are combining read and write bandwidth again for your side, while using the one-way bandwidth for your competition. Not quite being honest there, are you?[/QUOTE]
 
LOL. I actually joked the other day that I didn't want to get "Dyack'd" off the boards.

I think reasonable people understand that it's impossible for me personally to know every detail about everything with the platform. I think I got my chops busted the other day for not knowing who People Can Fly was. I haven't been paying a ton of attention to 360 over the last year or so because I've been focusing on Xbox One.

It's very frequent I have to ask questions of others and bring the answers back. I did the same thing here - went to an expert, got an answer, and brought it back.

People don't like the answer, cool, and I have absolutely no problem with questioning my specific answers or calling them into debate. That's part of the deal on here.

It's somewhat bothersome when people think you're out to just lie or fud or make it a personal thing. But again, there is no way I'd tackle this question unless I was confident from the people on the team that I'm right. Would have been a lot easier to dodge the question. And I have thick skin (literally, since I'm a big guy), so I can handle it.

I have a question: was that expert someone who worked on the Xbox One? & do he/she work for MS or AMD? if it's MS wouldn't that mean that he only know 1/2 the story because he wouldn't know how good or bad the PS4 preforms with the changes that was made to it's processors?

And even if it's someone from AMD do you think he is going to say "hey man look I'm sorry we made the PS4 chip a lot better than we made your chip" ?

I'm guessing that the expert told you about the enhancements that was made to the Xbox One Chip & letting you know how much better it preforms compared to a off-the-shelf part.
 
Ha! :P

I mean, the questions I see here... and Penello trying to answer.... Idk, it doesn't seem fair. If they have a weaker system, there's no way he'll just come here and say "hey, our system is 50% weaker and costs $100 more... but buy our console! It's great!"... there's no way we will know before the consoles are released if the power gap is true or not... there are many aspects involved which we have no idea about... all this debate is pointless... that's just what I mean.

With all these questions and answers and people getting nervous about it, all I can see is that some people might get banned or something like that. And that's not cool :/

Then don't make voodoo math and insult us. Then talk about your strength like Major Nelson did when cornered regarding DRM ........ Tell us " have you seen Titanfall ,end of discussion "
 
Nah, their scrambling to make their precious box look better. Ps4 is obviously the stronger console and it will show more and more as time goes on. I will not believe those liers at Microsoft.

Liers at Microsoft? Lordy. These are just electronics man. If they really wanted to spread fud they would be hitting up the media. Not making one off comments in a gaf thread. I think he's really just trying to engage and participate in the community.
 
Can't say I ever recall a time where MS have embellished the power of their consoles. Neither Xbox or 360 let me down on that front. Looking elsewhere though..

It will happen this gen, 360 had the better multiplats last gen, ps4 will have them this time and I like it. No more garbage multiplats tainting the play station brand.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom