Master Z said:I had a feeling this might suck. So what was so bad about it?
NLB2 said:That's 'cause they were making a movie about the wrong Alexander.
Meier said:Everything. The pacing in particular was dreadful.. the acting was not that bad but this thing just dragged and dragged and dragged. Way too much attempted symbolism -- honestly, there was very little I could say in praise of it. Right from the very start when it had this totally unnecessary trippy opening sequence I was concerned. The only thing that came to mind there was, "Why?"
Meier said:Feel free but I can gaurantee you'll hate it. It's waaaay too long -- seriously, it would have been better if they had just completely removed Anthony Hopkins' character's parts but I guess they wanted to add another superstar to the mix.
hXc_thugg said:Actually sounds like something I would like...a lot.
NLB2 said:That's 'cause they were making a movie about the wrong Alexander.
Celicar said:Meier, I can't believe you went to see this for free. I wasn't even going to waste my time. I knew it was going to be crap. Don't tell me. You went and saw the National Treasure movie for free too?
Usually when I think a movie has "bad pacing" it's because it does follow that format. Although yes, believe it or not, there is such a thing as being too slow.snaildog said:Are any of these bad impressions from people who know and love the whole Alexander story? "Bad pacing" too often means "doesn't follow typical American action film format".
(opening action scene, character introduction, action, story, action, main character fights with best friend, action, main character makes up with best friend, action, soppy happy ending)
ConfusingJazz said:Angleina Jolie said in a ridiculus accent "My revenge is in my WOMB!"
Celicar said:Meier, I can't believe you went to see this for free. I wasn't even going to waste my time. I knew it was going to be crap. Don't tell me. You went and saw the National Treasure movie for free too?
IAWTPNLB2 said:That's 'cause they were making a movie about the wrong Alexander.
AssMan said:The question is.......do you get to see Jolie's boobies?
Agent Dormer said:We haven't advertised it yet, but we're going to be having a screening of The Life Aquatic at the SLB on the 8th of December to cap off this semester's programing.
speedpop said:Being a huge Alexander the Great history buff, I am avoiding this movie at all costs. How did they deal with the homosexuality stuff? Or even the incestual rumours of Alexander and his mother?
Towards the end of this movie, I wanted to kill Alexander just to get it over with and go home.
"So awful that it's almost good."
"3-hour borefest."
"A swollen behemoth of a celluloid monster -- sometimes mildly interesting, but most of the time downright boring."
"An enormous cinematic mess.
NLB2 said:That's 'cause they were making a movie about the wrong Alexander.
Are any of these bad impressions from people who know and love the whole Alexander story? "Bad pacing" too often means "doesn't follow typical American action film format".
spoilers
Ned Flanders said:So when do the Rosario Dawson pics/vids hit the net?
Biff Hardbody said:It skips over his father's murder (although two hours later Stone returns to it in a flashback)
Ned Flanders said:So when do the Rosario Dawson pics/vids hit the net?
Ripclawe said:http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/alexander/
RATING: ROTTEN READING: 17%
(FRESH = 60% or Greater) Reviews counted: 58
Fresh: 10 Rotten: 48
Average Rating: 4/10
COCKLES said:Yet her and Farrell were dating for a large portion of filming....lol.