Am I gay if I find men often sexier than women ? Seriously.

Status
Not open for further replies.
BenedictCumberbatchPA170611.jpg

asaf-avidan-10.jpg

5435.jpg

147104-ajay-devgan-at-a-press-meet-to-promote-his-film-singham-in-new.jpg

Nikolaj+Coster+Waldau+HBO+Game+Thrones+Panel+mNex4aBYHK-l.jpg

5M9efJeNSgFqZyeqGmJO1BeBx6k.jpg

CzNcq0N.jpg



p6kwlnu.jpg


She looks a lot better from googling than she did in Scott Pilgrim for some reason.
 
If straight guys were asked which men they would switch teams for, most would go for the athletes they respect or men that are dapper so judging by some of OP's choices, I'd say he's willing to be loved and give love to another man and not just in it for the boning (which is still great btw). Dawwwww....

And I'll contribute this guy to the thread because he's sex-sex-sex hot, and I cried just a bit because of his overwhelming Spaniard beauty.
FkpqqPF.jpg

Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm that's one damn sexy man
 
Learn to Mary Elizabeth Winstead. It's like you didn't even watch The Thing (2011) or Abraham Lincoln Vampire Hunter. What are you doing with your life.

There was a lechery thread about her a while back. You can probably dig it up and letch.
 
I like girls that look like boys and boys that look like girls, what does that make me?

That makes you suitable.

OP: You may just be Bi - But then again, saying someone is attractive is much different than saying whether or not you would bang them. So, I must ask, would you bang those men listed in the OP? I, for one, do not think any of them are attractive, and I also would not bang them - but they're just not my types I suppose.
 
OP: Labels like "straight" or "gay" or "bisexual" all attempt to put people's sexualities into artificial categories. In real life, people show a continuum of desires and attraction, so you might find 1-in-100 men attractive while finding 5-in-10 women attractive, or maybe you find 9-in-10 women attractive and 1-in-200 men attractive.

In our arbitrary world, both of the above individuals would be bisexual, despite their preferences differing vastly. Heck, the latter might even be considered "straight", but with an occasional man crush.

This goes to show that we should just do away with labels, and just accept that people like people - not genders.
 
I can name more attractive male actors than female actresses but Thats nothing to do with my sexuality, its more to do with the fact i watch more films that are heavily male actor focused.

Im pretty shit when people say "who is your favourite female celebrity" but Thats really because i don't keep up with celebrity gossip. Jennifer Lawrence is definitely my number 1 at the moment :love:
 
OP: Labels like "straight" or "gay" or "bisexual" all attempt to put people's sexualities into artificial categories. In real life, people show a continuum of desires and attraction, so you might find 1-in-100 men attractive while finding 5-in-10 women attractive, or maybe you find 9-in-10 women attractive and 1-in-200 men attractive.

In our arbitrary world, both of the above individuals would be bisexual, despite their preferences differing vastly. Heck, the latter might even be considered "straight", but with an occasional man crush.
I'd consider both of them straight, or there would be no straight people on the Earth.
 
scr8_lazar.jpg


now thats perfection

This is impressive and all, but that's because I want to have his physique and not because I find him attractive. I have a feeling that's the case for a lot pf folks in this thread, that they simply want to be as attractive/rich/famous as the people they post pics of.
 
OP: Labels like "straight" or "gay" or "bisexual" all attempt to put people's sexualities into artificial categories. In real life, people show a continuum of desires and attraction, so you might find 1-in-100 men attractive while finding 5-in-10 women attractive, or maybe you find 9-in-10 women attractive and 1-in-200 men attractive.

In our arbitrary world, both of the above individuals would be bisexual, despite their preferences differing vastly. Heck, the latter might even be considered "straight", but with an occasional man crush.

This goes to show that we should just do away with labels, and just accept that people like people - not genders.

I find less than half the women I meet attractive and recognize some dudes as being attractive. I don't think that t makes me bisexual though dude.
 
I wonder if it is a phenomenon or if I am just simply unconsciously growing more gay by the day.
Opinions ?

Can you imagine getting intimate with a man? Kissing them, fondling them, just like you would with your girlfriend or wife?

I sure as hell can't, even though I have no problem acknowledging the fact that some men are more handsome than others.

So to answer your question: No, that alone doesn't make you gay.

If those pictures of handsome men actually manage to arouse you on the other hand...
 
I would agree that guys in general (when talking superstars) has a higher sex appeal and sexiness then girls.

BUT finding sexy =/= attracted to.

If you are attracted to, well, then you are gay or bi.
 
What's the problem with that?

That was my point - there are no straight, or gay, or bisexual individuals.
Because those categories are artificial in nature and either fuzzy as hell or simply don't reflect real people's sexual preferences.

If everyone is technically bisexual, e.g. capable of feeling attraction to both genders (even if it's only 1-in-1,000,000 for the same gender), then we might as well do away with that label.
 
Everyone can tell if someone is good looking regardless of sex. You're only gay or bi if you want to fuck them.

Random example I think David Tennant is a handsome motherfucker but I don't want to screw him.
 
OK, we're half way there.
Now Kenka, do you get physically aroused by other men?

If the answer is 'no', you're not gay.
Your attraction to certain men is probably just a form of admiration.
I once got aroused, I explained in another post but everybody "lulz, fat Swiss German" as if it was the epitome of tacky. Well, it is maybe.
Interesting that besides a few cumberwhites, most of the OP is more ... eastern looking dudes.
Where are you from, OP ?

Also, LOL at this topic xD
I'm Asian.
There's a difference between finding someone attractive and being attracted to them.
I feel the same, which makes tougher to define a real sexual orientation in my case.
I would agree that guys in general (when talking superstars) has a higher sex appeal and sexiness then girls.

BUT finding sexy =/= attracted to.

If you are attracted to, well, then you are gay or bi.
Yes, following this definition, I am bi. Although sexually more interested in girls in general.
OP, it took me a while to realize I was bisexual. I knew, but didn't really know, if that makes any sense. When I finally admitted it, and acted on it, boy did I regret not realizing it a lot sooner.

I suggest you give something like this a try, see how you like it:

5HIOAkP.jpg
Not attracted by this picture.
But well, between my misogyny, my seemingly passive attitude towards men I admire and my lack of satisfaction in my relations with women, I might just be a unassuming jerk.

There is much I must learn to first be a decent social person, and not a egoistic recluse, which I am too. To actually make efforts to reach my goals and stop being a beaten corpse in life will probably answer many of the answers about my sexuality.
I have a girlfriend but men are fucking attractive.

tumblr_mxaszoIQo71s8rrm6o1_500.jpg

tumblr_ml1cg6uzVE1sny96lo1_500.jpg


This. Is a sexy man.

Would I want to pursue a relationship/have intercourse with a dude? No. It's not my preference. But men, again, are fucking sexy.
Pretty much like you Silky.
I like girls that look like boys and boys that look like girls, what does that make me?
I like looking at them. They are... beautiful.

I am at a stage in my life in which I want to conciliate my views and my efforts, that is stop being complacent, gain composure and increase commitment. It would be very welcome if GAF could kick my ass at times if I slack off, as humiliating as such demand at first seems. Would you do it for me and allow me to discover ms true (great) self, GAF ?
 
lets face it why wouldn't you want to be gay? i made a list of the key reasons.

  1. men more attractive than women
  2. better at telling anecdotes/stories
  3. naturally more funny (gay gene)
  4. sex is better
  5. more money because no children
  6. you might be able to marry too now so that's another thing the straight people don't get to lord over us any more so suck on that, breeders
  7. larger average penis size
Going by that list it must really suck to be a lesbian.
 
all straight men find certain other men attractive physically, even sexually. They just don't admit it publicly or to themselves.
This isn't true. I can judge whether or not a guy is good looking, but I am not attracted to any of them. Especially not sexually.

You may not be, but some people are actually 100% straight.

That was my point - there are no straight, or gay, or bisexual individuals.
Because those categories are artificial in nature and either fuzzy as hell or simply don't reflect real people's sexual preferences.

If everyone is technically bisexual, e.g. capable of feeling attraction to both genders (even if it's only 1-in-1,000,000 for the same gender), then we might as well do away with that label.
Again, some people actually are straight. There is still a 'scale', but people can be on extreme ends of them.
 
I don't understand why there is so much aversion to the simple label of bisexual. Anyone with a reasonable attraction to more than one gender ought to identify as bisexual. Being gay or straight isn't an either/or matter.

Being attracted to the same sex is normal. And it certainly doesn't make you gay.
If there's anything that should be confusing, it's in what area of a spectrum of bisexuality(or possibly other terms like 'pansexuality' or 'polysexuality') one is. My sexuality fluctuates occasionally and makes me wonder where on the spectrum of bisexuality I fit.

Sometimes I am attracted to people in ways that defy all explanation. And there's all sorts of levels of sexual attraction for me that I'm surprised more people don't express. For instance, it's possible for me to be sexually excited by something, but completely psychologically unattracted to. Which more defines my sexuality, what I'm excited by, or what I'm psychologically attracted to? I would assume, and tend to go by, what I'm psychologically rather than physiologically attracted to. For instance, I can easily become excited by hypermasculine men, especially if their bodies are heavily sexualized. But I wouldn't want to date or kiss them. The idea of having sex with them actually seems less gross than kissing them. And if anything is actually seeming to cause some of the sexual excitement in me, it's that they're psychologically scary and a turn off. I don't like hypermasculinity.

"Oh God, it's hypermasculinity again" can easily turn into "OH GOD, it's hypermasculinity... again". And an uncomfortable sexual excitement starts developing. Rather than completely comfortable sexual excitement.

That's probably far into the area of "too much information", but it proves a point. Sexuality is a very complicated thing, and there is a lot of things between gay and straight.

I definitely don't find most attractive that gay men I seem to talk to do. Though that may have nothing to do with being gay and simply to do with the gay people I've talked to. The same with women. I don't find most women attractive that most straight men I seem to come across find attractive. Though that's probably just the fact that people are individuals and beauty is subjective.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom