Ulysses 31
Member
Everyone ready for a modern middle earth???
Everyone ready for a modern middle earth???
Wo woooo there buddy! Thats a bad look, friendo. It's just a case of a hard R, which is how hispanic and slavic people pronounce our Rs. Check your anglo-saxon privilege, my sweet summer child. Yikes.Okay look... If Tolkien said it this way, that's fine, but if not, if it's something Hugo weaving made up, then FUCK WHOEVER DECIDED IT WAS
"MORHDHORH"
I am beyond triggered by the way that narrator said "in the land of MOOHHTRRDROORDDFHH where the shadows lie"
It's got nothing to do with that, it's whether it's justified in any recording of TolkienWo woooo there buddy! Thats a bad look, friendo. It's just a case of a hard R, which is how hispanic and slavic people pronounce our Rs. Check your anglo-saxon privilege, my sweet summer child. Yikes.
This is not Resetera. I was joking. Though it's funny being stuck on a word pronunciation of all things that are going to probably go waaaay different from Tolkien's vision...and thats gonna be super sad.It's got nothing to do with that, it's whether it's justified in any recording of Tolkien
Exactly where I'm at. Fuck it up in any way, and I'm out that instant.I have a deep love of Tolkien's Middle Earth. I read everything he wrote on it, even the long and often boring Silmarillion. The second they make a clear break from the meticulous world he created in order to pander I'll be out. If that's in the first five seconds so be it.
And no, I don't need to accept it just because "it's fantasy". It's a wonderfully constructed world that existed before our own. It works precisely because it is different, and exact, as Tolkien envisioned it. That's why it resonates so. I am not interested in what lesser creators think that world should be.
Ahhh i got ya hahaThis is not Resetera. I was joking. Though it's funny being stuck on a word pronunciation of all things that are going to probably go waaaay different from Tolkien's vision...and thats gonna be super sad.
I would love a new movie set in the LOTR world, one tight movie which tells an amazing story with best quality special effects. I dont need some shitty padded out story going on way too long just to have more episodes where everything looks like a janky knock off from the classic films.
I feel like the abundance of streaming content has opened the door up for a lot of hacks to be working on themI said it in the Star Wars thread but it goes here too. I am so tired of TV Shows. Everything has to be a TV show now so they have "content" for their shitty streaming services.
There has been exactly 1 scifi/fantasy TV show with the full production values of a movie - Game of Thrones (mostly). Even the Mandalorian fell short times with things obviously looking like sets, some shitty costumes etc..
I would love a new movie set in the LOTR world, one tight movie which tells an amazing story with best quality special effects. I dont need some shitty padded out story going on way too long just to have more episodes where everything looks like a janky knock off from the classic films.
You can probably guess what appealing to a broader audience means in the current year.
That scifi show is Expanse, right?I said it in the Star Wars thread but it goes here too. I am so tired of TV Shows. Everything has to be a TV show now so they have "content" for their shitty streaming services.
There has been exactly 1 scifi/fantasy TV show with the full production values of a movie - Game of Thrones (mostly). Even the Mandalorian fell short times with things obviously looking like sets, some shitty costumes etc..
I would love a new movie set in the LOTR world, one tight movie which tells an amazing story with best quality special effects. I dont need some shitty padded out story going on way too long just to have more episodes where everything looks like a janky knock off from the classic films.
This show is post Saurons first defeat by Isildur? I thought it was waaaaaay before all that.New Character posters.
VEGA138: Daftar Link Slot Gacor Terbaru & Agen Slot88 Resmi 2023
VEGA138 adalah agen situs judi slot gacor online Slot88 terbaru. Daftar dan login slot gacor 2023 hanya di link slot resmi VEGA 138!newsopener.com
This must be Isildur holding Narsil.
I thought the show was about the rise of Sauron too, but that looks like the broken sword Narsil. Maybe there are other broken swords in LOTR.....I will have to look.This show is post Saurons first defeat by Isildur? I thought it was waaaaaay before all that.
The show is second age, forming of the rings. Long before Sauron and the Last Alliance.New Character posters.
VEGA138: Daftar Link Slot Gacor Terbaru & Agen Slot88 Resmi 2023
VEGA138 adalah agen situs judi slot gacor online Slot88 terbaru. Daftar dan login slot gacor 2023 hanya di link slot resmi VEGA 138!newsopener.com
This must be Isildur holding Narsil.
Doesn't Sauron make all the rings?The show is second age, forming of the rings. Long before Sauron and the Last Alliance.
Doesn't Sauron make all the rings?
No they were made by an Elf for Sauron. Celebrimbor Is the smith. Sauron only made the One Ring, himself. The others were contract work.Doesn't Sauron make all the rings?
Oh yeah, you right.No they were made by an Elf for Sauron. Celebrimbor Is the smith. Sauron only made the One Ring, himself. The others were contract work.
That is what I thought, but I don't know of any other broken swords from LOTR so I think it must be Narsil. If it isn't, I wonder what it is.The show is second age, forming of the rings. Long before Sauron and the Last Alliance.
Their hands are clasped together and there is gold dust on their fingers. They are wearing golden and jeweled bracelets and a flowing robe with golden triangles wrapped over their shoulders.
I'm psyched. This is the last chance for meaningful additional LOTR media.
TV is better suited than movies because it's so much longer. Amazon is definitely investing the money.
It could suck, but fingers crossed because if this bombs we have a Gollum game and that's it.
Holy shit, they got Kenji Kamiyama to direct?!
Ghost in the Shell SAC, Eden of the East, and Moribito’s director, oh fuck yeah.
Though I am worried that Sola Animation is animating it as they do CGI anime. I dunno, it might turn out fine, maybe even better if they’re given more time/money thanks to Warner Bros’ backing, but we’ll see. Definitely would have preferred 2D animation for this but I’ll wait for a trailer before passing judgment.
A let's play of Shadow of War.All I want to know is: what do I need to watch for sexy Shelob.
I…might need to give that a playA let's play of Shadow of War.
Are you ok? There is absolutely nothing wrong with what was written to describe the image.There needs to be a fucking revolt against using plurals as nouns and it needs to happen NOW!
It's so confusing. Whenever I see "they" about one person I instantly wonder where the other person is.
Bloody bullshit. I'd take zer og fer or whey or whatever any day over this bloody horeshite.
Eh, it's awkward at best. Even if it is technically grammatically proper (gender is unknown, so a plural pronoun is acceptable) it reads weird versus the usual tack of just picking he or she if the gender is irrelevant/unknown or using "it" so tha it is clear this is a singular being. Why is the gender a secret? What even is descriptive text though, who wrote it? Something for blind people surfing Twitter? If they are blind and they read this, will they think there is one person being described or multiple?Are you ok? There is absolutely nothing wrong with what was written to describe the image.
To be fair the person who quoted it missed out the first part which makes it pretty clear what is being described.Eh, it's awkward at best. Even if it is technically grammatically proper (gender is unknown, so a plural pronoun is acceptable) it reads weird versus the usual tack of just picking he or she if the gender is irrelevant/unknown or using "it" so tha it is clear this is a singular being. Why is the gender a secret? What even is descriptive text though, who wrote it? Something for blind people surfing Twitter? If they are blind and they read this, will they think there is one person being described or multiple?
It's good. One of the best Arkham clones if you just want to decapitate orcs all day. Kind of like a modern 3D beat-em-up.I…might need to give that a play
I…might need to give that a play
It is bad language. As someone who writes professionally it infuriates me to no end how this nonsense has managed to infest language.To be fair the person who quoted it missed out the first part which makes it pretty clear what is being described.
"DESCRIPTIVE TEXT: Close up of someone’s hands. We do not see this person’s face. Their hands are clasped together and there is gold dust on their fingers. They are wearing golden and jeweled bracelets and a flowing robe with golden triangles wrapped over their shoulders."
You're fired.It's a huge flaw in most languages, but "they" id a bad choice, because it already means something else.
I have thought about what the most annoying pronouns would be, just for the fun of seeing what a garbled mess reports would be like. On a side note, the history of punctuation is very interesting. If you think today is bad, imagine having no commasIt is bad language. As someone who writes professionally it infuriates me to no end how this nonsense has managed to infest language.
Language is in itself a poor form of communication. We misunderstand each all the time, tone is lost, mood is hard to convey, and then we have these dumb shits who insists on making it even harder to understand by actively using a plural about one person.
Now I get it, we need a word for someone who's sex we don't know. It's a huge flaw in most languages, but "they" id a bad choice, because it already means something else. Thus, you'll always confuse someone when using it.
That, and that alone, is enough to make the use of they about a singular person bad language.
No, the proof reader is. Typing on a phone with my giant thumbs, I can live with one error.You're fired.
But if you don't have the picture as a reference is it talking about person A close up on hands and can't see face but but multiple people with hands clasped together?To be fair the person who quoted it missed out the first part which makes it pretty clear what is being described.
"DESCRIPTIVE TEXT: Close up of someone’s hands. We do not see this person’s face. Their hands are clasped together and there is gold dust on their fingers. They are wearing golden and jeweled bracelets and a flowing robe with golden triangles wrapped over their shoulders."