Do we know when reviews hit? I haven't been hyped for hardware in a long time.
I'm interested to see if the 1600x and 1500 will score decently on the benchmarks, as i'm looking for a midrange upgrade option. Looking to replace my aging 17-2600k setup.
So... if the leaked bench are to be believed, the 1700 is still only ~50% faster than my 6 year old i7 2600k. That's good enough to upgrade I guess.
Guess I'm far from the only one sitting on a 2600k. I'll bet there are plenty of 2500 owners out there too.
I'm still distressed about upgrading, because the 2600k was such a huge improvement for CPUs that I feel like I should wait for a similar improvement. And the longer we go without a big leap forward for CPUs, the more likely it seems to be right around the corner. So I'm terrified of buying a CPU in today's incremental improvements market, only for some groundbreaking new tech to be announced the following year.
I'm really glad AMD is bringing their A game though. Maybe competition is exactly what consumers need to finally see a big step forward for CPUs.
Guess I'm far from the only one sitting on a 2600k. I'll bet there are plenty of 2500 owners out there too.
I'm still distressed about upgrading, because the 2600k was such a huge improvement for CPUs that I feel like I should wait for a similar improvement. And the longer we go without a big leap forward for CPUs, the more likely it seems to be right around the corner. So I'm terrified of buying a CPU in today's incremental improvements market, only for some groundbreaking new tech to be announced the following year.
I'm really glad AMD is bringing their A game though. Maybe competition is exactly what consumers need to finally see a big step forward for CPUs.
Yeah, I doubt we'll see those types of increases again in single core performance until we find a way to successfully move past silicon.You could be waiting a very long time. Things are very up in the air as far as fabrication goes. The reason you had those jumps before was because of more substantial die shrinks.
TDP/power efficiency is still making headway, but it's going to take more non traditional breakthroughs to really take things far beyond where we are now.
Without question.In game benchmarks.
We need them.
PCEVA:http://bbs.pceva.com.cn/thread-137649-1-1.html
1700X@3.4g vs 6800k@3.4g
Intel:
Intel Core i7 6800K :3.4G
ASUS STRIX X99 GAMING
16GB DDR4-2400(dual channel)
RX 480 8G 1266/2000 8GB GDDR5
BIOS:1401
OS:Win10 64bit
Crimson 17.2.1
2017.2.23
AMD:
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X :3.4G
ASUS PRIME X370-PRO
16GB DDR4-2133
RX 480 8G 1266/2000 8GB GDDR5
BIOS:404
OS:Win10 64bit
Crimson 17.2.1
2017.2.10
Found by csbin over at anandtech forums.
Hot giggidy
https://videocardz.com/66451/amd-ryzen-rumors-part-3
These performance figures and power consumption reminds me of the thrashing Nvidia usually unleashes on AMD GPUs.
I imagine a ton of gamers still rock the 2500/2600, the thing was a masterpiece.
But yeah, i'm really wondering how the midrange of this chip will go. There is a huge market for mid range pc gaming, with a ton of people using 1080p monitors, bleeding edge power is seemingly wasted.
Heck, i'm still rocking a 290x, and that was an upgrade over my previous card. My 2600k/290 still plays pretty much everything I throw at it with respectable frames. Probabaly won't go for the GPU upgrade till the 490 drops.
You could be waiting a very long time. Things are very up in the air as far as fabrication goes. The reason you had those jumps before was because of more substantial die shrinks.
TDP/power efficiency is still making headway, but it's going to take more non traditional breakthroughs to really take things far beyond where we are now.
Scorpio.
Who is jumping on AMD stock!?!?!?!
Currently sitting with an i5 4670 (not k), 16DDR3 and a GTX 1080, only issues Ive had is with the likes of WD2 (running @ 1440). I havent had an AMD CPU since 2004-2006ish during the Athlon range (time could be off, my memory is fuzzy). Really looking forward to seeing some real world benchmarks, was interested in the 1600X but might jump at the 1700X!
With the old adage of buy on rumor, sell on news, you're probably better off waiting at this point so close to release.
Going from an overclocked i7-2600K to an R7-1700 should be about 2x faster in multithreaded applications for a similar price.I'm still distressed about upgrading, because the 2600k was such a huge improvement for CPUs that I feel like I should wait for a similar improvement. And the longer we go without a big leap forward for CPUs, the more likely it seems to be right around the corner. So I'm terrified of buying a CPU in today's incremental improvements market, only for some groundbreaking new tech to be announced the following year.
It's $500 US and you have a 20% tax rate, so I'm not sure what you expected?1800X is 575 euros on Amazon Italy, jesus christ..
With the old adage of buy on rumor, sell on news, you're probably better off waiting at this point so close to release.
Oh I know, I was only joking .Definitely. I probably plan to sell on release. Will probably drop and then I'll have to decide whether or not I'm picking up more for long term. I don't have all that much to put in currently though. Arbitrage is allowing me to turn a quicker profit given my assets (student).
Any recommended mini-ITX mobo that will work with the Ryzen? Getting all my computer parts in line, so I can order most of everything right before Ryzen releases.
I don't get the title What is it about?
I don't get the title What is it about?
The X300 and X370 chipsets are coming at some point, but they won't be available this week in mini-ITX and they don't have a release date yet.
Here is one part of the rest:Thank you Jim Keller and the rest of the AMD engineering team
[...]
So when are we getting reviews and proper benchmarks?
Wasn't the benchmark embargo today? Hm.Embargo drops March 2nd.
Wasn't the benchmark embargo today? Hm.