AMD Says It Has Sold Over 200,000 Radeon RX 9070 Series GPUs In The First Batch, Promises Better Products In The Future

LectureMaster

Has Man Musk


AMD showcased its best-performing products at the AI PC Innovation Summit, claiming it has sold hundreds of thousands of RDNA 4 GPUs.

AMD just held its AI PC Innovation Summit in Beijing, and we saw AMD's CEO, Lisa Su; Senior VP, Spencer Pan; and SVP and GM of AMD China, Jack Hyunh, taking turns on the stage to discuss the company's newest products and innovations. As you can assume from the event's name, AI was AMD's one of the major focuses, which seems to have taken the tech world by storm.

In case you have been wondering how many units AMD might have shipped in the first batch, AMD gave its answer at the summit. It claims to have sold over 200,000 units of both GPUs and all of those were sold around the launch. We don't have the exact timeframe for this data, but hardlytwo weeks have passed. It's likely that the data corresponds to the first week or just the first batch.

On the other hand, NVIDIA has also claimed to have shipped twice the RTX 50 series GPUs in the first five weeks compared to its RTX 40 series. However, the chart NVIDIA showed had no numbers. So, we don't have any way to estimate it in order to compare with AMD card shipments.

 

LectureMaster

Has Man Musk
rvPwNpH.jpeg
 

Soodanim

Member
I'm still slightly concerned by the reports of restock 9070 XT prices being higher than original prices, but it's nice to see a bit of competition in the market. With nVidia doing what they're doing it was a no brainer that a decent product would sell gangbusters.
I would love for AMD to really start taking back dGPU market share from Nvidia and really competing again from top to bottom in the stack.

If Nvidia's bullshit continues with the 60 series.. I'm very strongly considering giving AMD a chance next gen simply out of principle.
I don't think AMD needs to compete against the top nVidia cards. If the mid tier market can be healthy it will help the entire GPU market without AMD having to try and compete in areas it doesn't want to compete in. This board has quite a few cutting edge whales, but they are not at all representative of the market.
 


AMD showcased its best-performing products at the AI PC Innovation Summit, claiming it has sold hundreds of thousands of RDNA 4 GPUs.

AMD just held its AI PC Innovation Summit in Beijing, and we saw AMD's CEO, Lisa Su; Senior VP, Spencer Pan; and SVP and GM of AMD China, Jack Hyunh, taking turns on the stage to discuss the company's newest products and innovations. As you can assume from the event's name, AI was AMD's one of the major focuses, which seems to have taken the tech world by storm.

In case you have been wondering how many units AMD might have shipped in the first batch, AMD gave its answer at the summit. It claims to have sold over 200,000 units of both GPUs and all of those were sold around the launch. We don't have the exact timeframe for this data, but hardlytwo weeks have passed. It's likely that the data corresponds to the first week or just the first batch.

On the other hand, NVIDIA has also claimed to have shipped twice the RTX 50 series GPUs in the first five weeks compared to its RTX 40 series. However, the chart NVIDIA showed had no numbers. So, we don't have any way to estimate it in order to compare with AMD card shipments.

AMD hasn't bragged about GPU sales in a long time. Good to see them doing well.
 

FireFly

Member
it is a sub RTX 70 class gpu when you engage RT and AI.

AMD is still useless in today's visual context

9070 is ok for the steam chart peasants, nothing more :lollipop_fire:
relative-performance-rt-2560-1440.png


 

LiquidMetal14

hide your water-based mammals
That is encouraging to hear. Considering the fact that they seem to be sold out mostly everywhere. If they would just make a competitive product on the high end to give people something to think about. I love Nvidia graphics cards but that's not dilute ourselves into some kind of corporate loyalty. It happened with Intel and their arrogance got the best of them while AMD finally got their act together. It can happen to Nvidia too if they're now careful.

I said this once and I'll say it again though, unlike Intel, Nvidia is actually not just sitting on their hands and they continue to innovate and advance on their hardware plus software solutions. It's the cost of everything which is really disappointing. You can't say they are doing exactly what Intel is doing so I don't want to see them fail in the same way as much as seeing the competition come up and go blow for blow to give the consumer something to think about. Maybe then they're absurd pricing will subside a little bit.
 

SABRE220

Member
They just need to improve drivers and path tracing performance in particular because in path tracing titles they lag behind even a 4070. This is a brilliant card outside pt but that is something they cannot ignore anymore like they did with rt in prior cards.
 
Last edited:

Magic Carpet

Gold Member
1500 wafers per day 200 chips per wafer is less than 1 days worth of product with a long coffee break in between.
Not bad for a Thursday
Friday it's back to making AI chips for all the real money.
 

hinch7

Member
Would've been something to see higher end RDNA 4 go against Blackwell. Seeing as how underwhelming the 5000 series has been. Imo a big a misstep for them to just stick to midrange.

In any case, this is a great thing as more competition breeds innovation. Will be curious to see if Nvidia responds, if they do.
 
Last edited:

MikeM

Member
9070 XT was great at $599 MSRP.
Now that the official scalpers retailers have increased the price to $700+ it's a 5070Ti priced card with 5070Ti Raster performance and sub 4070Ti RT performance making it utter bullshit and useless.
Where you live matters though. My Asus TUF 9070xt costs a full $400 CAD more in 5070ti form. Thats a massive Nvidia tax that is just not worth it perf- wise.
 
Last edited:

Crayon

Member
idk how that stacks up with typical shipments of comparable stuff. Is that a good amount of stock or what?
 

Buggy Loop

Gold Member
idk how that stacks up with typical shipments of comparable stuff. Is that a good amount of stock or what?

I don't know but worldwide + stacking these for months when the launch was supposedly january and only have 2 models to sell, I'm not sure its a victory lap. Would entire RDNA 2 lineup condensed into 2 models been similar? I would hope so?
 

Loomy

Thinks Microaggressions are Real
There's no guarantee we're not going to see a new kind of "AMD bullshit". The moment these companies start smelling money, they forget about the customers.
To be fair, AMD has been king of the hill in CPUs for a while now and things are still going well
 

riko

Neo Member
Just shows the appetite for a reasonable priced mid tier product. Not for me, but I am happy it exists.
 

riko

Neo Member
Update: AMD reached out to Tom's Hardware to clarify that no claims about sales numbers were given at the event. There was discussion about strong demand for RX 9000 (and X3D), but the 200K claim was not a part of that conversation, according to AMD. The Benchlife page which seems to have been the original source of the claim has also been pulled.


Oh well then.
 

Hohenheim

Member
Good to see AMD getting good reviews and positive vibes with their new cards.
I hope they make something in the high end too next time, so we can hopefully get some decent competition for the RTX 6090!
I love my 5090, but decent competition in that space too will be good for everyone.
 

StereoVsn

Gold Member
That is encouraging to hear. Considering the fact that they seem to be sold out mostly everywhere. If they would just make a competitive product on the high end to give people something to think about. I love Nvidia graphics cards but that's not dilute ourselves into some kind of corporate loyalty. It happened with Intel and their arrogance got the best of them while AMD finally got their act together. It can happen to Nvidia too if they're now careful.

I said this once and I'll say it again though, unlike Intel, Nvidia is actually not just sitting on their hands and they continue to innovate and advance on their hardware plus software solutions. It's the cost of everything which is really disappointing. You can't say they are doing exactly what Intel is doing so I don't want to see them fail in the same way as much as seeing the competition come up and go blow for blow to give the consumer something to think about. Maybe then they're absurd pricing will subside a little bit.
Nvidia spend on R&G is significantly lower than its peers and is in 10% range. Industry average is 18%. So while not exactly resting they are not putting the sort of money into R&G that they should be doing.

I guess Leather Jackets don’t buy themselves.
 

StereoVsn

Gold Member
9070 XT was great at $599 MSRP.
Now that the official scalpers retailers have increased the price to $700+ it's a 5070Ti priced card with 5070Ti Raster performance and sub 4070Ti RT performance making it utter bullshit and useless.
I have yet to see a 5070Ti in the wild under $900ish. And that includes Microcenter where I got my 9070XT for MSRP…
 
Last edited:

SABRE220

Member
That's a PT benchmark.
Aka the highest fidelity and most demanding settings aka crysis effect aka the very thing people buy expensive graphics cards for. Even something like a 6800xt can run rasterized games at max settings at high framerates. This line of thinking was what caused amd to lag so behind nvidia in the first place. Oh rt is pointless and irrelevant amd is great at raster and no need for ai upscaling frs 2 is good enough. I am really rooting for amd but they need to sort out pathtracing performance quick. The hardware is there get their software and dev support uptp par.
 
Last edited:

FireFly

Member
Aka the highest fidelity and most demanding settings aka crysis effect aka the very thing people buy expensive graphics cards for. Even something like a 6800xt can run rasterized games at max settings at high framerates. This line of thinking was what caused amd to lag so behind nvidia in the first place. Oh rt is pointless and irrelevant amd is great at raster and no need for ai upscaling frs 2 is good enough. I am really rooting for amd but they need to sort out pathtracing performance quick. The hardware is there get their software and dev support uptp par.
Peish's original post claimed that simply engaging RT would cause performance to drop below a 5070 (or 70 class card) making the card useless. When in reality, even games with heavy RT like Cyberpunk in Psycho RT mode, or Dying Light 2, do fine on the 9070 XT. So it's not the case that the 9070 XT is bad in heavy RT benchmarks generally; only that it's bad in path tracing specifically.

That doesn't mean that the current situation is "fine", just that we should give credit to AMD for where they have genuinely improved.
 
Last edited:

hinch7

Member
Peish's original post claimed that simply engaging RT would cause performance to drop below a 5070 (or 70 class card) making the card useless. When in reality, even games with heavy RT like Cyberpunk in Psycho RT mode, or Dying Light 2, do fine on the 9070 XT. So it's not the case that the 9070 XT is bad in heavy RT benchmarks generally; only that it's bad in path tracing specifically.

That doesn't mean that the current situation is "fine", just that we should give credit to AMD for where they have genuinely improved.
Yeah the RT performance is quite impressive. AMD and Radeon still have some ways to go for PT, but its not terrible as with RDNA 1-3.5.

Plus FSR is finally in a good place. Where FSR 4.0 actually delivers good image quality that even beats DLSS 2 (CN). The release is quite impressive all considering. Especially if you can get at or near MSRP.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom