hey_monkey
Banned
Okay. I'm not quite done reading, but...
[m] oreomunsta - New MDT
I think oreo and I would agree on some things, except hes read me as possibly scummy, so /stare
[m] Nomadic Sparks - New CST
Didnt realize that Sparks is new. This makes me much more suspicious than I was otherwise, because the other new players tend to be more willing to bend when someone disagrees with them. Maybe Sparks is just stubborn, maybe hes played elsewhere-Mafia with some very different strategies, but the unwillingness to really discuss now reads as suspicious to me. Even his defense of himself is defensive and almost angry why continue this approach when it doesnt seem to be working? (then again, that could mean town) There was also that slip about lynching YOUR own. Which is a very small thing and on its own, would not be noticed. But combined with someone who, like me, wants to be a post editor Im leaning scum. Maybe not enough for a day-one, but strong candidate for a lynching soon. It took an awful lot to finally get a hedging fair enough after a lot of arguing.
[f] hey_monkey - New EST
The most fabulous, obviously. Most fabulous fuck-up, anyway Im getting a better feel for all of this, though. Bear with me, please.
[m] rac - New EST
Dry wit, not sure hes trying to make people like him. Really not sure overall if its just new player finding his way or if hes trying to be overcautious, which would read scum.
[m] 30yearsofhurt - New - GMT+10
also voted rac early. Concerned re: swamped and 30 working together.
[m] Poltergust - New EST
Voted immediately. Overall, the most suspicious behavior consistently. Is it because new? Is it because unsure of how to act? Is it because scum and unsure how to act? High suspicion but not quite willing to call scum yet.
[m] Bowlie - GMT-3
Called out Poltergusts immediate vote. But I think the actions, so far, seem potentially productive. Holding out real judgment.
[m] SkyOdin PDT
Also went immediately aggressive. But made a lot of clear points.
[m] Palmer_v1 CST
Palmers been so all over the place that Im not sure. And that makes me worry.
[m] ultron87 EST
I get relatively helpful feelins on ultron so far. But theres not enough to tell just some questions and answers.
[m] cabot - GMT+1
Had forgotten cabot started off with a vote the attention all went to squidyj but that was because cabot voted for squidy immediately. Was this to force conversation or do they know something we dont? Looking back, I cant tell if it was irreverent or planned. However, cabots continued actions makes me thing its all provocative, down to the thorough breakdowns.
Defending Dragonz, which seems suspicious.
[m] Zubz EST
Fluff, but informed fluff. Some narrowed-eyes/not quite accusations. I do not agree with Dragonz-senpais early assessment, which makes me suspicious of her, but possibly because I was already suspicious.
[m] Dusk Soldier EST
Im leaning scum here because Dusk seems really focused on very specific things. That reads like a strategy to me and day one focus like this looks like scum. Maybe its consistent with past behavior. But theres also aggression. The cabot-chat thing is the single most suspiscious act so far for me. It felt like a curve ball - maybe it's based on old behaviors or no, but for me, it sticks out bigtime.
[m] Cewyn EST
Not sure about the sloth. Seems productively helpful but Im just not certain.
[m] BlackBuzzard CET
Was the first to call out Dragonz, based on defense of squidyj as a jokester. I suspect Dragonz-senpai but do believe squidy is joking, so this dismissal/accusation reads suspicious to me.
[m] Haly EST
Lots of people had interesting opinions on Haly but I got nothing. I get no read at all. Id like to hear others analysis here. Feels maybe too casual to me. Could be cautious scum. Not sure.
[m] squidyj MST
ALL squidys early posts were silly/irreverent. No longer think anything of the cop play as a tell. I was really concerned about this move because it felt layered and I do still think there was a strategy behind it, but I think it was an on-the-fly strategy, a sort of well, this is happening, what can I do with it. I do not support a day-one lynch at all and I dont think Ill budge on that. We can watch him, though. After today, I consider it a whole new game.
[m] TheExodu5 EST
Im biased because you voted for me based on super flimsy reasoning and then mostly bounced. But youre busy so Im gonna let it go. I hope you can be more active and productive soon.
[f] WhereAreMahDragonz MST
Called for peeking, or at least agreed to. That was first real move from her. Lots of fun and fluff. Lots of calling specific people out for their reads. The willingness to claim raised flags. Looking back Im also curious because she corrected me because her role is senpai. Is that a lowkey town claim? Gaijin-scum would not be senpai. Or is it a reference to her veteran status? She did say ROLE.
Re-reads again: didnt quite CALL for peeking. Didnt quite promise to claim. Didnt quite want to vote for a while. The hesitancy under guise of good cheer and helpful posts asking for others reads leads scum to me, but Im also maybe uncomfortable with a lynch here today. Not just because I like Dragonz-senpais faces. ♥(⌣ԅ
(they wont protect you forever; if youre with us, be with us.)
[f] Swamped EST
voted rac early for a loose reason trying to get a rise? Ive gone back and forth on my re-reads. At this point Im only willing to say shes a savvy player and that few-posts per day strategy leaves her a bit question mark for me.
[m] StanleyPalmtree - GMT+12
Seems helpful and has good insight.
[m] Kyanrute - GMT+2
I find Kyanrute as suspicious but it may just be his posting style. But it seems designed to deflect and instigate and I read that as scum.
[m] oreomunsta - New MDT
I think oreo and I would agree on some things, except hes read me as possibly scummy, so /stare
[m] Nomadic Sparks - New CST
Didnt realize that Sparks is new. This makes me much more suspicious than I was otherwise, because the other new players tend to be more willing to bend when someone disagrees with them. Maybe Sparks is just stubborn, maybe hes played elsewhere-Mafia with some very different strategies, but the unwillingness to really discuss now reads as suspicious to me. Even his defense of himself is defensive and almost angry why continue this approach when it doesnt seem to be working? (then again, that could mean town) There was also that slip about lynching YOUR own. Which is a very small thing and on its own, would not be noticed. But combined with someone who, like me, wants to be a post editor Im leaning scum. Maybe not enough for a day-one, but strong candidate for a lynching soon. It took an awful lot to finally get a hedging fair enough after a lot of arguing.
[f] hey_monkey - New EST
The most fabulous, obviously. Most fabulous fuck-up, anyway Im getting a better feel for all of this, though. Bear with me, please.
[m] rac - New EST
Dry wit, not sure hes trying to make people like him. Really not sure overall if its just new player finding his way or if hes trying to be overcautious, which would read scum.
[m] 30yearsofhurt - New - GMT+10
also voted rac early. Concerned re: swamped and 30 working together.
[m] Poltergust - New EST
Voted immediately. Overall, the most suspicious behavior consistently. Is it because new? Is it because unsure of how to act? Is it because scum and unsure how to act? High suspicion but not quite willing to call scum yet.
[m] Bowlie - GMT-3
Called out Poltergusts immediate vote. But I think the actions, so far, seem potentially productive. Holding out real judgment.
[m] SkyOdin PDT
Also went immediately aggressive. But made a lot of clear points.
[m] Palmer_v1 CST
Palmers been so all over the place that Im not sure. And that makes me worry.
[m] ultron87 EST
I get relatively helpful feelins on ultron so far. But theres not enough to tell just some questions and answers.
[m] cabot - GMT+1
Had forgotten cabot started off with a vote the attention all went to squidyj but that was because cabot voted for squidy immediately. Was this to force conversation or do they know something we dont? Looking back, I cant tell if it was irreverent or planned. However, cabots continued actions makes me thing its all provocative, down to the thorough breakdowns.
Defending Dragonz, which seems suspicious.
[m] Zubz EST
Fluff, but informed fluff. Some narrowed-eyes/not quite accusations. I do not agree with Dragonz-senpais early assessment, which makes me suspicious of her, but possibly because I was already suspicious.
[m] Dusk Soldier EST
Im leaning scum here because Dusk seems really focused on very specific things. That reads like a strategy to me and day one focus like this looks like scum. Maybe its consistent with past behavior. But theres also aggression. The cabot-chat thing is the single most suspiscious act so far for me. It felt like a curve ball - maybe it's based on old behaviors or no, but for me, it sticks out bigtime.
[m] Cewyn EST
Not sure about the sloth. Seems productively helpful but Im just not certain.
[m] BlackBuzzard CET
Was the first to call out Dragonz, based on defense of squidyj as a jokester. I suspect Dragonz-senpai but do believe squidy is joking, so this dismissal/accusation reads suspicious to me.
[m] Haly EST
Lots of people had interesting opinions on Haly but I got nothing. I get no read at all. Id like to hear others analysis here. Feels maybe too casual to me. Could be cautious scum. Not sure.
[m] squidyj MST
ALL squidys early posts were silly/irreverent. No longer think anything of the cop play as a tell. I was really concerned about this move because it felt layered and I do still think there was a strategy behind it, but I think it was an on-the-fly strategy, a sort of well, this is happening, what can I do with it. I do not support a day-one lynch at all and I dont think Ill budge on that. We can watch him, though. After today, I consider it a whole new game.
[m] TheExodu5 EST
Im biased because you voted for me based on super flimsy reasoning and then mostly bounced. But youre busy so Im gonna let it go. I hope you can be more active and productive soon.
[f] WhereAreMahDragonz MST
Called for peeking, or at least agreed to. That was first real move from her. Lots of fun and fluff. Lots of calling specific people out for their reads. The willingness to claim raised flags. Looking back Im also curious because she corrected me because her role is senpai. Is that a lowkey town claim? Gaijin-scum would not be senpai. Or is it a reference to her veteran status? She did say ROLE.
Re-reads again: didnt quite CALL for peeking. Didnt quite promise to claim. Didnt quite want to vote for a while. The hesitancy under guise of good cheer and helpful posts asking for others reads leads scum to me, but Im also maybe uncomfortable with a lynch here today. Not just because I like Dragonz-senpais faces. ♥(⌣ԅ
(they wont protect you forever; if youre with us, be with us.)
[f] Swamped EST
voted rac early for a loose reason trying to get a rise? Ive gone back and forth on my re-reads. At this point Im only willing to say shes a savvy player and that few-posts per day strategy leaves her a bit question mark for me.
[m] StanleyPalmtree - GMT+12
Seems helpful and has good insight.
[m] Kyanrute - GMT+2
I find Kyanrute as suspicious but it may just be his posting style. But it seems designed to deflect and instigate and I read that as scum.
