• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Announcements of the 2012 Nobel Prizes

Status
Not open for further replies.

CiSTM

Banned
It's that time again.

Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine
2fawW.jpg
037G2.jpg

John B. Gurdon, Shinya Yamanaka

***********
Full press
***********

The Nobel Prize recognizes two scientists who discovered that mature, specialised cells can be reprogrammed to become immature cells capable of developing into all tissues of the body. Their findings have revolutionised our understanding of how cells and organisms develop.

John B. Gurdon discovered in 1962 that the specialisation of cells is reversible. In a classic experiment, he replaced the immature cell nucleus in an egg cell of a frog with the nucleus from a mature intestinal cell. This modified egg cell developed into a normal tadpole. The DNA of the mature cell still had all the information needed to develop all cells in the frog.

Shinya Yamanaka discovered more than 40 years later, in 2006, how intact mature cells in mice could be reprogrammed to become immature stem cells. Surprisingly, by introducing only a few genes, he could reprogram mature cells to become pluripotent stem cells, i.e. immature cells that are able to develop into all types of cells in the body.

These groundbreaking discoveries have completely changed our view of the development and cellular specialisation. We now understand that the mature cell does not have to be confined forever to its specialised state. Textbooks have been rewritten and new research fields have been established. By reprogramming human cells, scientists have created new opportunities to study diseases and develop methods for diagnosis and therapy.

Nobel Prize in Physics
wMeR8.jpg
Qtetr.jpg

Serge Haroche, David J. Wineland

***********
Full press
***********
Particle control in a quantum world
Serge Haroche and David J. Wineland have independently invented and developed methods for measuring and manipulating individual particles while preserving their quantum-mechanical nature, in ways that were previously thought unattainable.

The Nobel Laureates have opened the door to a new era of experimentation with quantum physics by demonstrating the direct observation of individual quantum particles without destroying them. For single particles of light or matter the laws of classical physics cease to apply and quantum physics takes over. But single particles are not easily isolated from their surrounding environment and they lose their mysterious quantum properties as soon as they interact with the outside world. Thus many seemingly bizarre phenomena predicted by quantum physics could not be directly observed, and researchers could only carry out thought experiments that might in principle manifest these bizarre phenomena.

Through their ingenious laboratory methods Haroche and Wineland together with their research groups have managed to measure and control very fragile quantum states, which were previously thought inaccessible for direct observation. The new methods allow them to examine, control and count the particles.

Their methods have many things in common. David Wineland traps electrically charged atoms, or ions, controlling and measuring them with light, or photons.

Serge Haroche takes the opposite approach: he controls and measures trapped photons, or particles of light, by sending atoms through a trap.

Both Laureates work in the field of quantum optics studying the fundamental interaction between light and matter, a field which has seen considerable progress since the mid-1980s. Their ground-breaking methods have enabled this field of research to take the very first steps towards building a new type of super fast computer based on quantum physics. Perhaps the quantum computer will change our everyday lives in this century in the same radical way as the classical computer did in the last century. The research has also led to the construction of extremely precise clocks that could become the future basis for a new standard of time, with more than hundred-fold greater precision than present-day caesium clocks.

The Nobel Prize in Chemistry
zWYIC.jpg
QXXov.jpg


***********
Full press
***********
Smart receptors on cell surfaces
Your body is a fine-tuned system of interactions between billions of cells. Each cell has tiny receptors that enable it to sense its environment, so it can adapt to new situtations. Robert Lefkowitz and Brian Kobilka are awarded the 2012 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for groundbreaking discoveries that reveal the inner workings of an important family of such receptors: G-protein–coupled receptors.

For a long time, it remained a mystery how cells could sense their environment. Scientists knew that hormones such as adrenalin had powerful effects: increasing blood pressure and making the heart beat faster. They suspected that cell surfaces contained some kind of recipient for hormones. But what these receptors actually consisted of and how they worked remained obscured for most of the 20th Century.

Lefkowitz started to use radioactivity in 1968 in order to trace cells' receptors. He attached an iodine isotope to various hormones, and thanks to the radiation, he managed to unveil several receptors, among those a receptor for adrenalin: β-adrenergic receptor. His team of researchers extracted the receptor from its hiding place in the cell wall and gained an initial understanding of how it works.

The team achieved its next big step during the 1980s. The newly recruited Kobilka accepted the challenge to isolate the gene that codes for the β-adrenergic receptor from the gigantic human genome. His creative approach allowed him to attain his goal. When the researchers analyzed the gene, they discovered that the receptor was similar to one in the eye that captures light. They realized that there is a whole family of receptors that look alike and function in the same manner.

Today this family is referred to as G-protein–coupled receptors. About a thousand genes code for such receptors, for example, for light, flavour, odour, adrenalin, histamine, dopamine and serotonin. About half of all medications achieve their effect through G-protein–coupled receptors.

The studies by Lefkowitz and Kobilka are crucial for understanding how G-protein–coupled receptors function. Furthermore, in 2011, Kobilka achieved another break-through; he and his research team captured an image of the β-adrenergic receptor at the exact moment that it is activated by a hormone and sends a signal into the cell. This image is a molecular masterpiece – the result of decades of research.

The Nobel Prize in Literature
4Z9jt.jpg

The Nobel Prize in Literature for 2012 is awarded to the Chinese writer Mo Yan
“who with hallucinatory realism merges folk tales, history and the contemporary”.

The Nobel Peace Prize
European Union (EU)


The Nobel Peace Prize 2012 was awarded to European Union (EU) "for over six decades contributed to the advancement of peace and reconciliation, democracy and human rights in Europe

Last years thread.
Live webcasts can be found @ http://www.nobelprize.org/

And again for the Nobel buzz Murakami is the top guy at betting offices. I doubt he is going to get it... EVER!
 

CiSTM

Banned
First prize is in. OP updated.
The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2012

jointly to

John B. Gurdon and Shinya Yamanaka

for the discovery that mature cells can be reprogrammed
to become pluripotent
 
i0PDepm8dCvmL.jpg


BBC said:
Gurdon and Yamanaka share Nobel prize for stem cell work

Two pioneers of stem cell research have shared the Nobel prize for medicine or physiology.

John Gurdon from the UK and Shinya Yamanaka from Japan were awarded the prize for changing adult cells into stem cells, which can become any other type of cell in the body.

Prof Gurdon used a gut sample to clone frogs and Prof Yamanaka altered genes to reprogramme cells.

The Nobel committee said they had "revolutionised" science.

When a sperm fertilises an egg there is just one type of cell. It multiplies and some of the resulting cells become specialised to create all the tissues of the body including nerve and bone and skin.

It had been though to be a one-way process - once a cell had become specialised it could not change its fate.

In 1962, John Gurdon showed that the genetic information inside a cell taken from the intestines of a frog contained all the information need to create a whole new frog. He took the genetic information and placed it inside a frog egg. The resulting clone developed into a normal tadpole.

The technique would eventually give rise to Dolly the sheep, the first cloned mammal.
Reset button

Forty years later Shinya Yamanaka used a different approach. Rather than transferring the genetic information into an egg, he reset it.

He added four genes to skin cells which transformed them into stem cells, which in turn could become specialised cells.
Shinya Yamanaka Shinya Yamanaka used four genes to change a skin cell into a stem cell

The Nobel committee said the discovery had "revolutionized our understanding of how cells and organisms develop.

"The discoveries of Gurdon and Yamanaka have shown that specialized cells can turn back the developmental clock under certain circumstances.

"These discoveries have also provided new tools for scientists around the world and led to remarkable progress in many areas of medicine."

It is hoped the techniques will revolutionise medicine by using a sample of person's skin to create stem cells.

The idea is that they could be used to repair the heart after a heart attack or reverse the process of Alzheimer's disease.

Prof Gurdon, now at the Gurdon Institute at Cambridge University, described his research as: "Trying to find ways of obtaining embryo cells from the cells of an adult.

"The eventual aim is to provide replacement cells of all kinds starting from usually obtainable cells of an adult individual.

"For example, we would like to be able to find a way of obtaining spare heart or brain cells from skin or blood cells."
BBC News - Gurdon and Yamanaka share Nobel prize for stem cell work

Edit: I guess this is pretty similar to the PR in the OP. That hair reminds me of Nicolas Cage.
 

Neo C.

Member
I thought GAF is "Fuck yeah, science!", but this thread is rather calm. Anyway, in Yamanaka I trust, give me my extended life.
 
I always assume that the literature prize is going to go to someone I've never heard of before. That rules out famous authors like Murakami.
 

Clydefrog

Member
Wow. I love reading about these breakthroughs. The chemists spent almost half a century getting to where they are now in their research.
 

CiSTM

Banned
http://sports.ladbrokes.com/en-gb/A...PrizeAwards/Nobel-Literature-Prize-t210003519

Haruki Murakami at 6/4 odds, will this be his year?

I remember hoping a while back that Chinua Achebe would take it.
Betting odds don't mean jack. They are easy way to scam people out of few bucks. Murakami has become the holy cow for these guys, he has been numero uno for something like four years in a row. All the safe betters are going to bet on him. Murakami isn't really your typical Nobel material, he is good writer but he belongs in the Oprah book club class. He is author for people who want to seem cultured and cosmopolitan but don't want to actually put any effort in. Given that literature prize has been given to all kinds of authors. I'm betting some french play writer or Peter Nadas. Also I'm not saying Murakami is bad, he is one of my favorite authors and Wind up Bird being one of my favorite books. There just isn't all that much depth in his work...Again not a bad thing.

Edit. Also I can't be updating the OP until after my work day, I'm running from meeting to meeting so no GAF browsing while at work today :(
 

Dresden

Member
Betting odds don't mean jack. They are easy way to scam people out of few bucks. Murakami has become the holy cow for these guys, he has been numero uno for something like four years in a row. All the safe betters are going to bet on him. Murakami isn't really your typical Nobel material, he is good writer but he belongs in the Oprah book club class. He is author for people who want to seem cultured and cosmopolitan but don't want to actually put any effort in. Given that literature prize has been given to all kinds of authors. I'm betting some french play writer or Peter Nadas. Also I'm not saying Murakami is bad, he is one of my favorite authors and Wind up Bird being one of my favorite books. There just isn't all that much depth in his work...Again not a bad thing.

Edit. Also I can't be updating the OP until after my work day, I'm running from meeting to meeting so no GAF browsing while at work today :(

That's, uh, good for you.
 

CiSTM

Banned
That's, uh, good for you.

Come on, admit it. There is only so many books you can write about 30-ish average man who gets to thrown into whimsical surreal adventures. He has great knack making interesting stories but there is very little depth in his work. He is the Japanese Carlos Ruiz Zafón. Both write great stories but I don't see them winning Nobel prize at any point of their career.
 

Dresden

Member
Come on, admit it. There is only so many books you can write about 30-ish average man who gets to thrown into whimsical surreal adventures. He has great knack making interesting stories but there is very little depth in his work. He is the Japanese Carlos Ruiz Zafón. Both write great stories but I don't see them winning Nobel prize at any point of their career.

No, I don't care about Murakami's work--I'm just saying, the Prize isn't so much about merit as it is about politicking and influence. And the rant about Haruki came kinda out of nowhere.

Do I think Murakami will win? Not really, but I do think an Asian writer is due for one, probably Ko Un.
 

CiSTM

Banned
No, I don't care about Murakami's work--I'm just saying, the Prize isn't so much about merit as it is about politicking and influence. And the rant about Haruki came kinda out of nowhere.

Do I think Murakami will win? Not really, but I do think an Asian writer is due for one, probably Ko Un.

Rant about Murakami was there because some people take these betting sites as some kind of authority, when infact they have always been wrong. Looking at the past winners I don't see how literature prizes is about politicking not to mention the nomination process for literature prize isn't really build for promoting politicking.

There are likely laureates from asia countries and every other corner the world.

edit. It would totally suck if Murakami actually won this years prize after all the ranting :D
 

kottila

Member
EU will get the prize for bringing the longest period of peace in Europe in recorded history (I may have made that last fact up, but it could be true)

edit: did a minimum of research and it may actually be true. at least for a 1000 years
 

Tugatrix

Member
The Nobel peace prize lost all credibility, giving a prize to an institution that's being use by some countries to mistreat others and creating instability in the reagion.
 

CiSTM

Banned
lol




European Union (EU)


The Nobel Peace Prize 2012 was awarded to European Union (EU) "for over six decades contributed to the advancement of peace and reconciliation, democracy and human rights in Europe
 

Juicy Bob

Member
Does this mean all of us living in EU member states can technically call ourselves Nobel Peace Prize winners now? Cool.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom