Anti-Intellectualism
- Thread starter whytemyke
- Start date
- Status
basik said:
Grammar and spelling are your smile and handshake on the internet. First impressions are extremely important in any social setting. I agree, grammar and spelling (as well as proper verb tense) do not indicate intelligence, but they certainly do make a lasting impression.
Tell me you don't see people who type shit like this:
OMG lyke I wuz sooo crzy mad at that boi LOLZ
...and don't immediately think, 'middle school'.
Just like when I see people with poor spelling, especially when I see 'definately', and I think 'high school'. First impressions are important.
Jared Goodwin
Member
basik said:
Or a shut-in.
basik said:
I often see this argument perpetuated by people who either never go to college or did poorly at college. I mean, to denegrate an entire educational process, and to minimize to simply grammar lessons is pretty horrible.
Let me put it this way... I see a whole lot more intelligent people with college degrees than I see intelligent people without them, at least in my own generation. While I agree that a good portion of college students think that they can merely procure a degree and pass themselves off as competent, the majority (at least here, as I can't speak for schools everywhere) understand that there's more than just a piece of paper to the mark of competency. The degree, the undergrad degree that is, is simply an indicator of possible intelligence, and really just helps weed people out in a business community.
The graduate degree, however, I believe is more of an accent to intelligence, than the definition of it.
Forgotten_Taco
Member
basik said:
What about Mr Street thug college degree smarty pants hustler?!
ooh, butiapetus said:Because you're not surrounded by girls who want your "intelligent conversation"?
YOU GOT BEAT, BRITpage 1 said:
anyways, i have as much of a preoccupation with the street prophet, the insightful ne'er do well, as anyone else. on one level i think it's a cultural thing, very holden caulfield, and in that sense i think it's almost innocently idiomatic, not necessarily negative. like anything, it's when the incidentals of human society, in this case cultural artifacts and mythology, are used to manipulate the masses for the gain of the few that we should really be bothered, and in that sense we should generalize it not as anti-intellectualism but as a kind of weaponized play on cultural preconceptions to underhandedly refute some specific reasonable claims.
Vinzer Deling
Banned
djtiesto said:
Funny story.
I was in a motorcycle accident a few years ago. I broke bones in my foot and ankle. First doctor to see me said my foot had to go. 2nd said the same, so did the 3rd. I told em all to fuck off. Then the last one recommended surgery and I still have my foot today.
I suppose I should have been "rational" and let them amputate a perfectly good foot because some doctor said so.
Musashi Wins!
FLAWLESS VICTOLY!
That rings true to me, and all 3 are extremely strong forces even now.
I think you could add the peculiar worship of youth that pervades our culture as well.
Me too.
SatelliteOfLove
Member
etoliate said:
True, true; to most everyone, he's "the guy that got head off the oval office and got away with it" rather than the Rhodes Scholar, (but it got him elected to governorship and the presidency twice each, didn't it?).
Kaijima said:
Yeah, parts of this article itself felt like rallying cries for the intellectural crowd against the anti-intellectualist movement.
- Status