I got a 16 1/2 year old cat with kidney disease that has progressed pretty rapidly (it was just showing on the blood test in January, I think they said the creatin was a level 2? and now it's a level 5 and her bun is at 85). And this week she's doing ok. I figured out how to get her to eat I think. She has been put on 100 ml of fluids every day and that really perks her up (and she doesn't even seem to mind getting the fluids amazingly enough). Before we did that she was acting super lethargic and it really felt like time. Now other than her not eating and she's pretty weak (you can easily knock her over just by pushing lightly on her cause she's unstable walking), she seems more perked up and acts like herself (including being stubbern about doing things even though they are harder since she's weaker. Like jumping up on top of a chair she wants to be on).
But the hardest thing for her is to get her to eat enough and I know that will make her go downhill faster if she won't eat. Last I weighed her and htat was weeks ago she was 2 lbs underweight and I don't think I have gotten her to eat as much as she would when she was eating fine. I had a cat that was dieing that we force fed (we didn't know he was dieing) and he hated it so I really don't want to have to go that route unless it will give her a decent amount of quality life to do so (I don't want her to spend her last bit of life being miserable from the treatment). I really regret forcing him to eat in hindsight (and also not taking more steps to figure out if what he had was most likely something we could save him from. If I had known it was most likely a futile thing I would have just let him be comfortable rather than trying all this stuff that made his last week a hassle for him. I'm trying to avoid doing the same thing to this cat especially as I know this will eventually be fatal no matter what I do).
I keep hearing how important it is to get her to eat cause otherwise her kidneys go faster (even if it's not good food for the kidneys).
Anyone got any opinion on if it is most likely worthwhile to force feed her if she stops eating entirely (Hell, for the last week or so she'd only eat a bite of her food and maybe all of the gravy I gave her but many times not even all of that. I was very stoked to get her to eat 3/4 of her breakfast this morning, that's more than she's eaten at once in a while and it involved me sitting with her petting her while she ate). Or even force feed her some now to try to get her to eat more (she really needs to gain weight even).
My vet just gave me a really vague answer that pretty much said it's up to me and that if I want her to live longer sh eneeds to eat. I know that but I don't know how likely it is she has of living much longer even if I get her to eat. I just want to know what chances I have that if I get her to eat even by forcing that she'll have a good chance of at least living months or longer? I have more hope this week but last week I was sure she just had a week left with the way she's going (she seems pretty comfortable other than the not eating part this week. The fluids have really seemed to help. Now if I could just get her to eat more. I'm not even sure I can repeat getting her to eat as much this morning. I just discovered she'll eat more when I'm with her but usually she just eats about 1/4 of the food which is still more than she usually will eat without me being there).
But the hardest thing for her is to get her to eat enough and I know that will make her go downhill faster if she won't eat. Last I weighed her and htat was weeks ago she was 2 lbs underweight and I don't think I have gotten her to eat as much as she would when she was eating fine. I had a cat that was dieing that we force fed (we didn't know he was dieing) and he hated it so I really don't want to have to go that route unless it will give her a decent amount of quality life to do so (I don't want her to spend her last bit of life being miserable from the treatment). I really regret forcing him to eat in hindsight (and also not taking more steps to figure out if what he had was most likely something we could save him from. If I had known it was most likely a futile thing I would have just let him be comfortable rather than trying all this stuff that made his last week a hassle for him. I'm trying to avoid doing the same thing to this cat especially as I know this will eventually be fatal no matter what I do).
I keep hearing how important it is to get her to eat cause otherwise her kidneys go faster (even if it's not good food for the kidneys).
Anyone got any opinion on if it is most likely worthwhile to force feed her if she stops eating entirely (Hell, for the last week or so she'd only eat a bite of her food and maybe all of the gravy I gave her but many times not even all of that. I was very stoked to get her to eat 3/4 of her breakfast this morning, that's more than she's eaten at once in a while and it involved me sitting with her petting her while she ate). Or even force feed her some now to try to get her to eat more (she really needs to gain weight even).
My vet just gave me a really vague answer that pretty much said it's up to me and that if I want her to live longer sh eneeds to eat. I know that but I don't know how likely it is she has of living much longer even if I get her to eat. I just want to know what chances I have that if I get her to eat even by forcing that she'll have a good chance of at least living months or longer? I have more hope this week but last week I was sure she just had a week left with the way she's going (she seems pretty comfortable other than the not eating part this week. The fluids have really seemed to help. Now if I could just get her to eat more. I'm not even sure I can repeat getting her to eat as much this morning. I just discovered she'll eat more when I'm with her but usually she just eats about 1/4 of the food which is still more than she usually will eat without me being there).