• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

AP Lit Sample Selection: VERY VERY FUNNY

Status
Not open for further replies.
Mr. Jones, of whose personal accomplishments we have hitherto said very little, was, in reality, one of the handsomest young fellows in the world. His face, besides being the picture of health, had in it the most apparent marks of sweetness and good-nature. These qualities were indeed so characteristical in his countenance, that, while the sprit and sensibility in his eyes, though hey must have been perceived by an accurate observer, might they must have been perceived by an accurate observer, might have escaped the notice of the less discerning, so strongly was this good-nature painted in his look, that it was remarked by almost every one who saw him.

It was, perhaps, as much owing to this as to a very fine complexion that his face had a delicacy in it most inexpressible, and which might have given him an air rather too effeminate, had it not been joined to a most masculine person and mien: which latter had as much in them of the Hercules as the former had of the Adonis. He was besides active, genteel, gay and good-humored, and had a flow of animal spirits which enlivened every conversation where he was present.

When the reader hath duly reflected on these many charms which all centered in our hero, and considers at the same time the fresh obligations which Mrs. Waters had to him, it will be a mark more of prudery than candour to entertain a bad opinion of her because she conceived a very good opinion of him.

But, whatever censures may be passed upon her, it is my business to relate matters of fact with veracity. Mrs. Waters had in truth, not only a good opinion of our hero, but a very great affection for him. To speak out boldly at once, she was in love, according to the present universally received sense of that phrase, by which love is applied indiscriminately to the desirable objects of all our passions, appetites, and senses, and is understood to be that preference which we give to one kind of food rather than to another.

But through the love to these several objects may possibly be one and the same in all cases, its operations, however must be allowed to be different; for, how much soever we may be in love with an excellent sirloin of beef, or bottle of Burgundy; with a damask rose, or Cermona fiddle; yet do we never smile, nor ogle, to gain the affection of the said beef, etc. Sigh indeed we sometimes may; but it is generally in the absence, not in the presence, of the beloved object...

The contrary happens in that love which operates between persons of the same species, but of different sexes. Here we are no sooner in love that it becomes our principal care to engage the affection of the beloved. For what other purpose, indeed, are our youth instructed in all of the arts of rendering themselves agreeable? If it was not with a view to this love, I question whether any of those trades which deal in setting off and adorning the human person would procure a livelihood. Nay, those great polishers of our manners, who are by some though to teach what principally distinguishes us from the brute creation, even dancing-masters themselves, might possibly find no place in society. In short, all of the graces which young ladies and young gentlemen too learn from others, and the many improvements which, by the help of a looking-glass, they add of their own, are in reality those very spicula et faces amoris so often mentioned by Ovid; or, as they are sometimes called in our own language, the whole artillery of love.
This shit cracks me up. The questions are funny too. They use words like "flippant" and "feigned bitterness" It seems as though they took a regular two of three paragraph selection about two people checking each other out, put it through a thesarus program and just printed the result. It's as though Futami himself wrote this garbage.

As I read this I can just hear the sound of burning money as an English major toils away at his chosen craft. Losers. AHAHAHAHAHAHA
 
we may be in love with an excellent sirloin of beef, or bottle of Burgundy; with a damask rose, or Cermona fiddle; yet do we never smile, nor ogle, to gain the affection of the said beef, etc

I found that bit funny, but that was the intent. You don't read much, do you?
 

belgurdo

Banned
pottery.jpg
 

Yossarian

Member
I stopped reading at "hitherto." There may be a time and a place for obscure vocabulary, but I don't have to like it.
 
Manabanana said:
I found that bit funny, but that was the intent. You don't read much, do you?
Yeah, that was the funniest part to me. I have to make a recording of that line sometime, especially the "etc" bit. I could easily hear Garrison Keillor lampooning it on A Prairie Home Companion...

Anyway, I read plenty, but I have NEVER read anything as crappily put together as that. I swear that selection was written in clauses as opposed to fully actualized ideas. Even Poe's writing, while putting to use a high level of diction, had a cadence, a flow about it that made it easy to read. This selection is shit. I would like to see the reviews a book written like this would get.


"Sirloin of beef" wtf? AhAHAHHAHA
 

tedtropy

$50/hour, but no kissing on the lips and colors must be pre-separated
I like 'dem there words mister...you sure got a purdy mouth a hur hur hur...
 
I would like to see the reviews a book written like this would get.

Tom Jones (1749) is rightly regarded as Fielding's greatest work, and one of the first and most influential of English novels. At the center of one of the most ingenious plots in English fiction stands a hero whose actions were, in 1749, as shocking as they are funny today.

Never read it myself. Google tracked down this exerpt pretty easily, though. http://www.bartleby.com/302/905.html
 

MASB

Member
Manabanana said:
Ahhhh, this is Ikenna. Tricksy.
Now that I know who Ikenna is, I'll follow his posts as entertainment is sure to follow! ;) :)

Since when has 'hitherto' been considered obscure? Sure, you don't exactly see the word everyday, but anyone who has read any significant amount, shouldn't be too put off by it. Next thing you know, someone will say 'therefore' is obscure. ;)

At any rate, the sample was funny. :)
 

gblues

Banned
Actually that sample is pretty typical writing for that time period. Try reading something by George Elliot, such as Middlemarch. :)

Nathan
 

Loki

Count of Concision
I would like to see the reviews a book written like this would get.

....

Tom Jones (1749) is rightly regarded as Fielding's greatest work, and one of the first and most influential of English novels. At the center of one of the most ingenious plots in English fiction stands a hero whose actions were, in 1749, as shocking as they are funny today.

OWNED :lol


Thanks, Chesapeake. :p
 

GG-Duo

Member
AP Lit is scary. I don't mean the whole "3 essays in 2 hours" thing.. that part is relatively easy compared to the MC. ugh.
 
MASB said:
Now that I know who Ikenna is, I'll follow his posts as entertainment is sure to follow! ;) :)

Since when has 'hitherto' been considered obscure? Sure, you don't exactly see the word everyday, but anyone who has read any significant amount, shouldn't be too put off by it. Next thing you know, someone will say 'therefore' is obscure. ;)

At any rate, the sample was funny. :)
It is no secret that I am indeed the one named Ikenna. In fact, it should be duly noted that upon my premiere post I made this known to all.

border said:
WWW.DRUDGEREPORT.COM

**FUNCTIONALLY ILLITERATE UNABLE TO COMPREHEND THAT 18TH CENTURY TEXT IS DIFFERENT FROM MODERN LIT**

Developing...
Furthermore, the fact that the selection was written in the 18th century does not reserve it from any criticism from readers today. You mean to propound the notion that the paintings on the walls of French caves are masterpieces solely due to the fact that they were made in the BC? That, in my humblest of opinions, is, for the most part, suggestive to the fact that you are in possession of a tender mind.
 

border

Member
Hitherto, what I propose to propound is that you should not take writings from an entirely different era and judge them by the standards of today. Though one might believe that past works have been surpassed, it remains important to recognize their place in and influence on the western literary canon. Even Shakespeare and Chaucer would be a bit out-of-place if you subjected them to tastes of the 20th and 21st century.

"The droghte of March hath perced to the roote"

HAHAHA WHAT A STUPID FUCK OMG LOL
 

Mandark

Small balls, big fun!
You haven't proposed a better criteria for the literary canon than the consensus of scholarship that's come before you. Going by your evaluation of the excerpt, you're nowhere near qualified to, either.

Do Garrison Keiler's spoofs of hard-boiled pulp fiction mean Dashiel Hammet has no literary value? Argumentum ad name-droppingum.
 
Ikenna = TheNigerian = Kenny.

The Black Stallion said:
Furthermore, the fact that the selection was written in the 18th century does not reserve it from any criticism from readers today. You mean to propound the notion that the paintings on the walls of French caves are masterpieces solely due to the fact that they were made in the BC? That, in my humblest of opinions, is, for the most part, suggestive to the fact that you are in possession of a tender mind.
Kenny, you are absolutely, without a shadow of a doubt, the most unintelligent and ugliest black man on this planet. It's funny how everyone else sees it but you. I've known you for 4-5 years, and in those years you've become progressively more retarded as each day goes by.
 

demon

I don't mean to alarm you but you have dogs on your face
The Black Stallion said:
Furthermore, the fact that the selection was written in the 18th century does not reserve it from any criticism from readers today. You mean to propound the notion that the paintings on the walls of French caves are masterpieces solely due to the fact that they were made in the BC? That, in my humblest of opinions, is, for the most part, suggestive to the fact that you are in possession of a tender mind.





So you're a joke character, right?
 
The Black Stallion said:
It is no secret that I am indeed the one named Ikenna. In fact, it should be duly noted that upon my premiere post I made this known to all.


Furthermore, the fact that the selection was written in the 18th century does not reserve it from any criticism from readers today. You mean to propound the notion that the paintings on the walls of French caves are masterpieces solely due to the fact that they were made in the BC? That, in my humblest of opinions, is, for the most part, suggestive to the fact that you are in possession of a tender mind.
Yeah... that post, and the others that followed it, are all in jest. You really think I type like that all the time? Also, upon further review, the selection was rather funny. I may even go check this book out, after season of course. Also, I am not a joke character. I am one of the most authentic posters on this forum. It's not my fault if people find my exploits and musings to be entertaining.
 

BlackMage

Banned
The Black Stallion said:
Yeah... that post, and the others that followed it, are all in jest. You really think I type like that all the time? Also, upon further review, the selection was rather funny. I may even go check this book out, after season of course. Also, I am not a joke character. I am one of the most authentic posters on this forum. It's not my fault if people find my exploits and musings to be entertaining.

Entertaining isn't the word I'd use.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom