Snowybreak
Member
Mob takes the fifth, eh? Hmm...
$45k?!CNN has more:
A new letter from the leading Democrat on the House oversight committee, Rep. Elijah Cummings, reveals new information about former national security adviser Michael Flynn and what he told investigators about his ties to foreign governments when he was interviewed about his security clearance.
According to the Report of Investigation, which Cummings refers to in his letter to committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz, Flynn made false statements to investigators about who funded his foreign trips, including a 2015 trip to Russia where Flynn was paid roughly $45,000 to speak at an event in Moscow. According to the letter released today by Democrats on the committee, Flynn claimed they his trips were funded by "US companies."
The report stated that Flynn said he "had not received any benefit from a foreign country."
Flynn also claimed to investigators he had no substantial contacts with foreign government officials, saying he only had "insubstantial contact." Flynn was shown sitting next to Russian President Vladimir Putin at the 2015 dinner.
Source: http://edition.cnn.com/2017/05/22/p...-flynn-letter0908PMVODtopLink&linkId=37889264
$45k?!
Didn't know treason was so cheap.
The right to not incriminate oneself is as important as freedom of speech and you should probably read up on the 5th Amendment before suggesting shit like this.They should just jail him until he turns all his document over. Trump can't pardon him if he's not convicted.
They should just jail him until he turns all his document over. Trump can't pardon him if he's not convicted.
Huh, I thought the 5th was just about testimony, I didn't realize you could withhold physical evidence using it.
I hope the democrats play his "lock her up" chant at 2018 and 2020 as commercials to show who trump and others backed.
It's mentioned in an article someone linked, but basically, while the documents themselves are not protected, the act of producing specific documents could be considered testimony.I was under this impression as well, but I'm not an expert.
I thought it was in regards to testimony so that someone couldn't get caught up in semantics that could play well with the jury, etc.
Anyone who knows more, please school me!
They should just jail him until he turns all his document over. Trump can't pardon him if he's not convicted.
A presidential pardon may be granted at any time, however, and as when Ford pardoned Nixon, the pardoned person need not yet have been convicted or even formally charged with a crime.
So what's the best, most plausible outcome of this investigation?
I plead the fizzsith
I really hope they try this defense.I thought corporations were people
It honestly seems like Flynn is utterly fucked. This coming from someone that doesn't think it can be definitively said Donald directly colluded with Russia.
Flynn be like
Oh good, it's almost L 'oclock.
CNN has more:
The report stated that Flynn said he "had not received any benefit from a foreign country."
Source: http://edition.cnn.com/2017/05/22/p...-flynn-letter0908PMVODtopLink&linkId=37889264
Oh good, it's almost L 'oclock.
You know, given Trump has shown no regard for precedence, what if he just pardoned Flynn and everyone else involved? What happens?