• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

April 2012 NPD Sales Results [Up3: Best selling game sold less than 236K, Kid Icarus]

Roxas

Member
I see the "Vita SW sales don't include digital..." line is here already.

Yes, these sales figures don't include digital but since there's absolutely nothing to go on in terms of estimating Vita DD sales on a per title (or across-the-board) basis saying "they don't include digital" adds little to the discussion.

It'll be the same when Nintendo roll out their retail/digital releases later in the year. Unless they start releasing sales figures for digital titles, all we'll have to go on - and all we'll be able to use to judge the success of their games - will be the retail figures we get, and saying "bu-bu-but the digital..." will be just as useless.

You could say that the number of ratings of a title on the Playstation store is a MINIMUM indication of how well it sells digitally.
 
You could say that the number of ratings of a title on the Playstation store is a MINIMUM indication of how well it sells digitally.

Are the ratings only able to be made by players with the game, as in the 3DS eShop system? If so, that gives a minimum, yes.
 

SmokyDave

Member
I see the "Vita SW sales don't include digital..." line is here already.

Yes, these sales figures don't include digital but since there's absolutely nothing to go on in terms of estimating Vita DD sales on a per title (or across-the-board) basis saying "they don't include digital" adds little to the discussion.
Other than the fact that it's totally and utterly relevant when talking about software sales.

It'll be the same when Nintendo roll out their retail/digital releases later in the year. Unless they start releasing sales figures for digital titles, all we'll have to go on - and all we'll be able to use to judge the success of their games - will be the retail figures we get, and saying "bu-bu-but the digital..." will be just as useless.

And people will still be right to point out that the retail numbers don't make up the entirety of the software sold.

I don't think anybody is suggesting that the DD numbers are more important, just that they are very relevant and are not being tracked here.
 

verbum

Member
It would be interesting to know if the average age of a person who plays a certain amount of pc/console video games has increased, decreased, or stayed the same.
Perhaps younger people are playing more smart phone, iPad, etc games and the pc/console gamers' average age has increased?

If it has increased it would explain some of the soft market, since the 25 yo and older crowd is probably facing increasing costs in other financial areas of their lives- such as gasoline, groceries, etc.

It will be interesting this fall to see if Madden, Halo, and COD also reflect these decreasing sales.
 

Kusagari

Member
I see the "Vita SW sales don't include digital..." line is here already.

Yes, these sales figures don't include digital but since there's absolutely nothing to go on in terms of estimating Vita DD sales on a per title (or across-the-board) basis saying "they don't include digital" adds little to the discussion.

It'll be the same when Nintendo roll out their retail/digital releases later in the year. Unless they start releasing sales figures for digital titles, all we'll have to go on - and all we'll be able to use to judge the success of their games - will be the retail figures we get, and saying "bu-bu-but the digital..." will be just as useless.

The situation for Vita is horrible regardless. I just don't like trashing these sales figures when they don't include digital, because the, very few, people who are buying Vita right now are the most likely to go digital.

The sales figures are most likely skewed more toward digital right right now than should be normal for the system.

I normally scoff at mentions of something like this, but when you factor in the Vita's situation currently - I think it becomes a very real problem with calculating Vita software sales at the moment.
 

Roxas

Member
Are the ratings only able to be made by players with the game, as in the 3DS eShop system? If so, that gives a minimum, yes.

Yes, only people who bought the game can rate it.

Just looked at the UK Store now on my Vita, and Rayman has over 1000 ratings whilst Unchated only has 400. I personally bought Rayman from the store and bought a physical copy of Uncharted.

I'm sure some of the games which didnt appear to do well at retail havent done too badly on the DD store.
 
Other than the fact that it's totally and utterly relevant when talking about software sales.

And people will still be right to point out that the retail numbers don't make up the entirety of the software sold.

I don't think anybody is suggesting that the DD numbers are more important, just that they are very relevant and are not being tracked here.

So, in the time that the NPD didn't track WalMart sales, do you think that would have been worth mentioning in relation to poorly-performing titles?

"Well, Nintendo title X only did Y, but remember these figures don't include WalMart, so..."

Yes, only people who bought the game can rate it.

Just looked at the UK Store now on my Vita, and Rayman has over 1000 ratings whilst Unchated only has 400. I personally bought Rayman from the store and bought a physical copy of Uncharted.

I'm sure some of the games which didnt appear to do well at retail havent done too badly on the DD store.

Am I right in thinking that ratings don't divide digital/retail? If so, are we not back at square one? It'll be the same issue with 3DS DD titles if Nintendo don't separate ratings out for digital/retail versions of the software.
 

Blearth

Banned
The industry is dying in its current form. Can't wait for the rebirth.

apple-android-520x346.jpg
 
It'll be the same when Nintendo roll out their retail/digital releases later in the year. Unless they start releasing sales figures for digital titles, all we'll have to go on - and all we'll be able to use to judge the success of their games - will be the retail figures we get, and saying "bu-bu-but the digital..." will be just as useless...

correct. & we will be judging success based on fuck-all :) ...

right now, sales figures of vita software not including dd tell you next to nothing. much more so than any previous console, handheld or otherwise...
 
This is what happens when you try to extend a console generation out too far. Happens every time. The general population looks at their shelf and see they already have enough X-box or PS3 games and decide they don't need to buy anymore. If Sony and Microsoft aren't releasing their next consoles till 2013 or later and the WiiU is the dud its looking like, its going to be a really hard 16 months for the industry.
 

SmokyDave

Member
So, in the time that the NPD didn't track WalMart sales, do you think that would have been worth mentioning in relation to poorly-performing titles?

"Well, Nintendo title X only did Y, but remember these figures don't include WalMart, so..."

Um, yeah, probably?

I certainly wouldn't have a problem with someone pointing that out.

The Vita has digital releases for all titles, day & date. It's obviously worth considering when looking at the numbers. I own 9 Vita games but according to sales charts, I haven't bought any at all.
 

Roxas

Member
Am I right in thinking that ratings don't divide digital/retail? If so, are we not back at square one? It'll be the same issue with 3DS DD titles if Nintendo don't separate ratings out for digital/retail versions of the software.

No, you can only rate if you downloaded it from the store.
 

UberTag

Member
Hopefully all of the new consoles will have full digital access to all new titles at launch (like the Vita) and we can finally do away with NPD sales data completely.
All of our sales data will then be gleaned from leaderboards, game ratings and user activity lists from Major Nelson.

Ah, wasn't entirely clear (possibly my sleep-addled brain!).
Yes, that gives us a base figure for DD sales then.
Provided, of course, that people actively rate the titles they purchase.
I should probably do that with the dozen or so Vita games I own at some point.
 
No, you can only rate if you downloaded it from the store.

Ah, wasn't entirely clear (possibly my sleep-addled brain!).

Yes, that gives us a base figure for DD sales then.

Provided, of course, that people actively rate the titles they purchase.
I should probably do that with the dozen or so Vita games I own at some point.

It gives us the absolute minimum DD sales, though - sales can't be lower than X, though they could be higher.
 
The Vita has digital releases for all titles, day & date. It's obviously worth considering when looking at the numbers. I own 9 Vita games but according to sales charts, I haven't bought any at all.

:)

vita - the npd-buster. because, yes, when all of a console's content is simultaneously released & made available via dd, & this's one of the console's major selling points, traditional npd numbers become extremely useless...
 
BTW anyone remembers what was Uncharted 1 first NPD month ? I recall it was rather pathetic too and then total sales grew together with PS3 to several milions.

And speaking about sales of titles is at most exercise in theorical analysis since without knowing how much game like Uncharted GA costs it's hard to say if the sales are good or not ?

Normally around half of game cost goes back to first party publisher (IIRC) so with 150k in USA, 100k ? in Japan (or close to it) and probably another 100k in EU we are looking at at least 9 milions of revenue, not counting digital sales on PSN (and each sale on PSN gives Sony full 45$-taxes).
 

1-D_FTW

Member
:)

vita - the npd-buster. because, yes, when all of a console's content is simultaneously released & made available via dd, & this's one of the console's major selling points, traditional npd numbers become extremely useless...

Unless it ships with no build-in memory, makes SD cards proprietary with an insane markup, and offers almost no discount (despite having to supply your own expensive cartridges and losing resale rights). Yeah, no. DD are not outselling physical. If retail is bombing, the DD numbers are abysmal.

Smokey Dave has an insanely expensive computer too. He's not your typical gamer by any measurement. Dude spends money that other people just don't.
 
Unless it ships with no build-in memory, makes SD cards proprietary with an insane markup, and offers almost no discount (despite having to supply your own expensive cartridges and losing resale rights). Yeah, no. DD are not outselling physical. If retail is bombing, the DD numbers are abysmal.

source? or you just 'know'?...
 

SmokyDave

Member
Unless it ships with no build-in memory, makes SD cards proprietary with an insane markup, and offers almost no discount (despite having to supply your own expensive cartridges and losing resale rights). Yeah, no. DD are not outselling physical. If retail is bombing, the DD numbers are abysmal.

You assume.

It's an assumption I probably share, even as a 100% DD Vita owner, but it's an assumption nonetheless.


Smokey Dave has an insanely expensive computer too. He's not your typical gamer by any measurement. Dude spends money that other people just don't.
Compared to most of the PC guys on here, I might as well be running an Amstrad PCW8512. You're right though, I'm certainly not the average games buyer.
 
:)

vita - the npd-buster. because, yes, when all of a console's content is simultaneously released & made available via dd, & this's one of the console's major selling points, traditional npd numbers become extremely useless...
HardWare numbers are still important and right now they don't look so hot for Vita :)
 

1-D_FTW

Member
source? or you just 'know'?...

Common sense. I'd be the one time I'd be willing to engage in a ban bet. Because everything we know about digital sales (under much more favorable conditions), says it's absolutely ridiculous. 100X more rediculious than the Nintendo fans who used to claim Nintendo got all their sales from Walmart and the NPD didn't accurately reflect how well their games were selling.
 
I laugh every time someone on GAF claims new consoles right now would fix this situation rather than over saturating the market with more expensive machines making it collapse on itself.

To begin with,there's nothing to fix.While Xbox 360 sales are really good,PS3 sales are in line with the most reasonable expectations.

Code:
April NPD Sales Results

            360       PS3    

2007        174k      82k     
2008        188k      187k  ---> GTA IV
2009        175k      127k     
2010        185k      180k     
2011        297k      204k     
2012        236k      167-199k



Nintendo,obviously,is in a different position.

Code:
April NPD Sales Results

            Wii           

2007        360k           
2008        714k    ---> Mario Kart Wii
2009        340k           
2010        277k           
2011        172k           
2012        67-99k


NPD April 2007

Official April 2008 NPD thread

NPD Sales Results for April 2009

NPD Sales Results for April 2010

NPD April 2011 Sales Results
 

Kusagari

Member
I think the digital sales are making up a significant portion of Vita's software sales, but saying they're making up more than retail really is ludicrous. There is no way that's true.
 

AHA-Lambda

Member
No, console makers are dragging out the generation longer than it needs to and it is reflecting in spending on games. Consumers are sick of playing the exact same games over and over again.

Is that really the case? I'd argue the opposite, as the gen has gone on longer people are only trying out what they already know. The numbers are up in many cases over previous installments for games like: Madden, FIFA, CoD, GTA, BF3, AC etc.

Is it healthy for an industry to survive on 3 months out of a year though?

It seems to have gone on ok with its top heavy fall routine for years unfortunately. Personally though, I am totally sick of it. After Max Payne 3 there are no BIG AAA releases out until October with RE6, so the numbers are just going to get worse.
 
Common sense. I'd be the one time I'd be willing to engage in a ban bet. Because everything we know about digital sales (under much more favorable conditions), says it's absolutely ridiculous. 100X more rediculious than the Nintendo fans who used to claim Nintendo got all their sales from Walmart and the NPD didn't accurately reflect how well their games were selling.

all i can suggest is that, to the extent that the hardware is only being bought at this point by a bunch of early adopter loonies, your sense of what's 'common' might not apply right now...

you may be correct. but you may not...
 

SmokyDave

Member
I edited. Although I may have mistaken you for Smokey. Smokey, SmokeyDave. How could I miss the Lakers flags :lol.
Oh yeah, Smokey has a beast of a PC. You're right that I buy more games and systems than the average dude though. I was there day 1 for the PSP Go too!

I think the digital sales are making up a significant portion of Vita's software sales, but saying they're making up more than retail really is ludicrous. There is no way that's true.

I don't think anyone is saying that, are they?
 
true. but neither does today's weather. & neither have much to do with my point :) ...
About the meaning of the NPD numbers? Yes, it's relevant.

However, 1-D_FTW claim might not be far away from reality even if is not backed up by a scientific study. If people choose to only talk when covered by the umbrella of scientific data then there wouldn't be many talk in society and not many ways to reach the truth.

So i think its a fairly logical assumption grounded in common sense. It's more plausible than the case of Vita satting sales records in the DD space.
 

Htown

STOP SHITTING ON MY MOTHER'S HEADSTONE
Xeno didn't make 3rd, shocking. It probably still did well though.

You expect a two year old game to crack the top ten? Good luck. There's no excuse for a lack of a near simultaneous releases in this day and age. Nothing kills hype like time.

It wouldn't show up even if it was number one.

Acclaimed Wii RPG Xenoblade Chronicles was a retailer exclusive, so is excluded from NPD's monthly report.
 
Thanks for your input. The point still stands. One can't say it is the poor economy when another company sells a $500 - $800 toy and can literally sell all of them that they can manufacture.

one absolutely can. just because one device may be immune to the economy doesn't magically stop the economy from effecting other products. unless you're arguing that the best sign of the economy's health is iPad sales...

plus, you're disparaging the iPad to call it a toy. it is much more than that for many people. how many people are replacing their desktops and laptops with iPads? a growing number certainly.
 
Digital downloads are probably responsible for a small, unquantifiable percentage of the decline, but Occam's razor suggests it's mostly because people aren't buying games.

You can't just handwave two games that would have made the top 10 this month as small and unquantifiable.
 

jvm

Gamasutra.
Nice attempt at eliciting an avatar quote. I'm not falling for your ruse!

Not a good sign for the industry, but by the time we see how bad May is, E3 will be in full blast so no worries!
I consider it somewhat likely that NPD will delay the results if they are really bad. They delayed May's results a couple of years ago and we got May results in the first week of July and June results the very next week.
 

Akira

Member
If China were to fail for Apple, that'd be a warning sign that current growth would likely slow

I know you're just giving an example, but I just wanted to chime and say that this is about as likely as Apple relocating production back to the US. Nearly damn everyone in Beijing has an iPhone it seems like. I'd say 8/10 people on the subway has an iPhone out, the other two has an iPad. I went to the Apple store in Xidan on a random Sunday afternoon back in February (so before the iPad 3 came out) and it was absolutely, shoulder-to-shoulder packed with several people waiting on the iPhone or iPad to try it out. I would say China is even more "Apple-crazed" than the US.

Regarding Vita, it's too soon to tell but I believe it will become more successful in a year or two. Just a gut feeling.
 

SykoTech

Member
As has already been mentioned in this thread, it seems that software numbers were very low across the board. Star Wars Kinect may have sold less than 300,000 units this month.

Yeah, looks like it. Not quite as bitter then.

It seems Activision are the only winners here. They said Prototype 2 would own April, and it did. I'm sure they were expecting a hell of a lot more than this though.
 

Chaplain

Member
Market really needs new hardware.

Or, maybe just new IP's.

1.) Prototype 2 (sequel)
2.) Kinect Star Wars
3.) Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 (sequel)
4.) Tiger Woods PGA Tour 13 (sequel)
5.) NBA 2K12 (sequel)
6.) The Witcher 2 (sequel)
7.) Mario Party 9 (sequel)
8.) Mass Effect 3 (sequel)
9.) Just Dance 3 (sequel)
10.) MLB 12 (sequel)
 
Or, maybe just new IP's.

1.) Prototype 2 (sequel)
2.) Kinect Star Wars
3.) Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 (sequel)
4.) Tiger Woods PGA Tour 13 (sequel)
5.) NBA 2K12 (sequel)
6.) The Witcher 2 (sequel)
7.) Mario Party 9 (sequel)
8.) Mass Effect 3 (sequel)
9.) Just Dance 3 (sequel)
10.) MLB 12 (sequel)

So the only one that isn't a sequel is from one of the biggest franchises out there.

This industry :/
 
Top Bottom