ARIZONA!! We will now most likely get to see Obama's Birth Certificate

Status
Not open for further replies.
speculawyer said:
John McCain was born in Panama!

*sigh* As you well know, military bases qualify as US soil for this purpose and that means McCain is qualified to be President. George Romney on the other hand was born in a polygamous Mormon colony.
 
what the fuck is wrong with this shitty ass country?

Let's just give Arizona back to Mexico. It's a worthless piece of shit state.
 
ObamaBirthCertificate.gif
 
If what these birthers says are true, then the states of IL and HI, the entire U.S government, every U.S court, every anti-Obama admin self-interest group, the Democratic and Republican parties and the entire news media all missed or (covered-up!) that Obama is a Kenyan. :lol Or maybe thery're all apart of the vast conspiracy!
 
Averon said:
If what these birthers says are true, then the states of IL and HI, the entire U.S government, every U.S court, every anti-Obama admin self-interest group, the Democratic and Republican parties and the entire news media all missed or (covered-up!) that Obama is a Kenyan. :lol Or maybe thery're all apart of the vast conspiracy!
And they started within a week of his birth by contemporaneously putting a birth announcement in the hawaii newspapers. It all makes sense!

GrotesqueBeauty said:
I get it. You're one of those guys.

People who can read and write?
 
Here is all Obama needs to do to win Arizona . . . run this ad in spanish on the local spanish stations:
"You know what it is like to be hassled by cranky white government officials about your papers? WELL I SURE DO! Vote for me, Barack Obama."
 
speculawyer said:
Here is all Obama needs to do to win Arizona . . . run this ad in spanish on the local spanish stations:
"You know what it is like to be hassled by cranky gringo government officials about your papers? WELL I SURE DO! Vote for me, Barack Obama."

Fixed, a bit.
 
grumble said:
That's a fallacy. The birth thing is a totally useless provision for US citizens. A more useful one would be 'has spent at least 90% of his/her life in the US or off killing foreigners for the US'. Freedom of speech on the other hand would be an important provision.

The Constitution isn't automatically 'right'. You do have to use your brain.

There are many things about the Constitution that are flawed and should be changed. That doesn't mean that one can simply flout those provisions.
 
elrechazao said:
People who can read and write?
No, the flippant solipsist. I think we've already established we can all read and write here, although implying the contrary is certainly cute. You're more interested in how you come across than taking someone's meaning in earnest. Your original question is moot, because people already have to pass certain standards of eligibility to attain office. This legislation isn't a good faith effort, and a even the most cursory reading of the situation makes it pretty obvious it's the result of masked racism and paranoia. For someone who's so well read you have a lot of trouble reading between the lines, although apparently you find your own density to be a mark of great intellect.
 
Gaborn said:
*sigh* As you well know, military bases qualify as US soil for this purpose and that means McCain is qualified to be President. George Romney on the other hand was born in a polygamous Mormon colony.
Actually that law wasn't passed until after McCain's birth. When McCain was born and for part of his childhood, he was a Panamanian citizen, not legally American. But when the law went into effect, it also worked retroactively... which is why he could run.

Still, I think that's a lot fishier than Obama's so-called questioned citizenship. Obviously a stupid and completely unsubstantiated accusation tossed out by some crazy looking for something to cast doubt on him, and everyone ate it up... and even when it was proven wrong, which was as easy as asking someone, people still believe it to this day.

Stuff like this makes me lose hope for this country. The frightened masses will believe what the frighteners tell them to believe... even when cold hard evidence to the contrary is shoved down their throats.

Anyway, sorry Gaborn that wasn't all directed towards you... just the military bases-citizenship law factoids. I just got a little carried away :D
 
GrotesqueBeauty said:
No the flippant solipsist. You're more interested in how you come across than taking someone's meaning in earnest. Your original question is moot, because people already already have to pass certain standards of eligibility to attain office. This legislation isn't a good faith effort, and a even the most cursory reading of the situation makes it pretty obvious it's the result of masked racism and paranoia. For someone who's so well read you have a lot of trouble reading between the lines, although apparently you find your own density to be a mark of great intellect.
"People already have to pass certain standards of eligibility" - When do they do this, and what body certifies these results? Have you investigated the standing issues that the courts have raised in response to challenges to eligibility not just for this particular politician, but others? Evidently not.

Do you enjoy arguing with yourself? Because I never said this legislation was a good idea, and in fact specifically said the opposite. Again, I'd suggest seeking out someone with the ability to read to help you on on this.
 
God I'm ashamed to be living in AZ right now. All I hear about lately is passing prop 100 to save our schools and then the government wastes money with crap like this? Awful just plain awful.
 
Carlisle said:
Actually that law wasn't passed until after McCain's birth. When McCain was born and for part of his childhood, he was a Panamanian citizen, not legally American. But when the law went into effect, it also worked retroactively... which is why he could run.
Weren't his parents US citizens?
 
Carlisle said:
Actually that law wasn't passed until after McCain's birth. It works retroactively. But still, when McCain was born and for part of his childhood, he was a Panamanian citizen, not legally American.
Many people in this thread are confusing "born in the US" and what the constitution actually says, which is "natural born citizen" For a definition see: http://www.usconstitution.net/consttop_citi.html "born in the US" isn't the only way you are a citizen, and McCain was never "not legally american".

Korey said:
Weren't his parents US citizens?

correct, see the link above: "Any one born outside the United States, both of whose parents are citizens of the U.S., as long as one parent has lived in the U.S."
 
dschalter said:
There are many things about the Constitution that are flawed and should be changed. That doesn't mean that one can simply flout those provisions.
Doesn't mean you need to throw up straw men about taking away freedom of speech when someone says that either.
speculawyer said:
:lol :lol :lol
 
Carlisle said:
Actually that law wasn't passed until after McCain's birth. When McCain was born and for part of his childhood, he was a Panamanian citizen, not legally American. But when the law went into effect, it also worked retroactively... which is why he could run.

Still, I think that's a lot fishier than Obama's so-called questioned citizenship. Obviously a stupid and completely unsubstantiated accusation tossed out by some crazy looking for something to cast doubt on him, and everyone ate it up... and even when it was proven wrong, which was as easy as asking someone, people still believe it.

Stuff like this makes me lose hope for this country. The frightened masses will believe what the frighteners tell them to believe... even when cold hard evidence to the contrary is shoved down their throats.

Anyway, sorry Gaborn that wasn't all directed towards you... just the military bases-citizenship law. I got a little carried away.

Don't worry about it man. Personally I'm glad that they changed that law, and honestly I wouldn't have a problem with changing the citizenship requirement. I say that if the public wants to vote for someone and they're an experienced, qualified candidate they should be allowed to run.
 
Gaborn said:
Don't worry about it man. Personally I'm glad that they changed that law, and honestly I wouldn't have a problem with changing the citizenship requirement. I say that if the public wants to vote for someone and they're an experienced, qualified candidate they should be allowed to run.
governator.jpg
 
elrechazao said:
Many people in this thread are confusing "born in the US" and what the constitution actually says, which is "natural born citizen" For a definition see: http://www.usconstitution.net/consttop_citi.html "born in the US" isn't the only way you are a citizen, and McCain was never "not legally american".



correct, see the link above: "Any one born outside the United States, both of whose parents are citizens of the U.S., as long as one parent has lived in the U.S."
Ah I stand corrected. I was mostly referring to his ability to run for president, which is indeed different from citizenship since that requires a birth on US soil.
 
Carlisle said:
Ah I stand corrected. I was mostly referring to his ability to run for president, which is indeed different from citizenship since that requires a birth on US soil.
Huh? You don't have to be born on US soil to be a citizen or run for president.

Stop making me defend McCain, dammit!
 
Korey said:
Huh? You don't have to be born on US soil to be a citizen

True.

or run for president.

Run? technically not. SERVE as president? Yes.

and again. By act of Congress McCain and others born on Military bases around the world meet eligibility requirements for being a natural born US citizen.
 
Gaborn said:
True.



Run? technically not. SERVE as president? Yes.

and again. By act of Congress McCain and others born on Military bases around the world meet eligibility requirements for being a natural born US citizen.
Ok, looked into it further. Right now it's unclear. All the constitution says is that you have to be a "natural born citizen", which most understand to be citizen by birth as opposed to naturalized later, but nowhere does it explicitly define "natural born citizen" either way.

They dodged a bullet with McCain, but they should probably get that cleared up in an amendment sometime.
 
I am very happy to be able to live in the US, its very convenient ... but man am I glad Im not a citizen and dont have to relate to some of these people :|
 
milanbaros said:
Genuine question. What happens if someone was born on holiday in a foreign land? Would he still be able to?
That's what the debate is, but most likely yes. If you are born to US citizen parents overseas you are automatically a citizen. But are you a "natural born citizen"? Most would say yes, but the Constitution doesn't say specifically and there hasn't been that case yet for a precedent.
 
cartoon_soldier said:
See, I am now trying to anticipate what will AZ pass next.

We got two hits in this week.

I am guessing something to do with Christianity and God is next.
I mentioned it in the other thread but you missed where we passed a law removing the requirement for permits in order to conceal and carry. So we're 3 for 3 on the crazy.
 
numble said:
I don't understand all these Arizona actions--I thought AZ was trending blue? (I've not been keeping up)
I think you underestimate the number of old people that live here.
 
Ridli said:
I think you underestimate the number of old people that live here.
Yup. Tons of old mid westerners and a growing population of Mormons. Don't think it'll swing blue for awhile if ever.
 
Public-Enemy-By-The-Time-I-Get-3039.jpg


I'm so glad I left this fucking state.

Also, howsabout we start giving money to states that actually want to work with as a union and taking it away from states where the government just wants to play "Harass the Negro"?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom