I'm in my early 30's, and for me, it wasn't so much becoming more "conservative." We have a new awareness of the unique values, mindsets, and cultures we see through the internet connected world, and ways to communicate with people across the world instantaneously. This truly is a relatively new thing. Not all cultures value tolerance, and what disturbs me the most is what looks like a turn to intolerance of different likes and dislikes, and the institutionalized promotion of being quick to judge. Recently I've become more mindful of values, history, and the formation of attitudes and mindsets so I could understand what happened to lead to the current situation because there's actually a radically different set of attitudes and mindsets even though I'm not that much older than young adults. I ended up caring more about understanding people's values, attitudes, and mindsets than assigning dichotomous labels. I once heard that the term "conservative" is kind of a meaningless term because what matters is the values that you want to conserve. Suppose one of those values is "coexisting with those who have different likes and dislikes, and not imposing through force your own likes and dislikes or censoring likes that you don't dislike." Looking back in history, that would be a "progressive" value relative to what was before. I realize that it's not their fault they turned out the way they did, people my age and above abetted it perhaps knowingly or unknowingly through the educational practices they were told to follow, or lack of understanding the child development process (I think that one and the constant bombardment of negativity through the internet were major factors.) Education should be to teach communication and reasoning, an up to date understanding of natural science, and history taught truthfully and completely, meaning that not just negativity and bleakness but optimism and positivity is touched on as well.
For the most part it was that way when I was educated, though I also realize some things were deliberately not taught for certain reasons. It kills me to see that "it's not me, it's the children that are wrong" Skinner picture haha
It's because to some extent, they are not naturally coming to be how they are, but made to be that way by people much older than them. Now I realize that in the nature or nurture view, nurture plays a huge role in how they turn out fundamentally early on, the parenting style, the one off or unique experiences, then maybe hormones is the nature part. By age 25 my emotional mind kind of calmed down on its own, then I was ready to delve into the reasons for things being how they are or aren't and to keep or refute any values I had taken for granted. I also try empathizing with others' reasoning for their conclusions, and understand that religion can be a very important thing for people. Even totalitarianism and the intolerance of differences has its reasoning (safety? fear of humanity annihilating itself? being indoctrinated to submit yourself to avoid offending someone however subjective "offensive" is? faith in a heaven on Earth?) but to me that's always going to be a form of slavery. Even if the future leads to annihilation sooner than when the Sun engulfs the planet, shouldn't the human beings alive until that point be free? Or in the case of entertainment, free to express what amuses them or pleases them, wherever it leads? To not be able to do so would be slavery of the mind. It used to be "the views expressed in this program do not necessarily reflect the views of this station. viewer discretion is advised" I'd much rather that than self censorship or trigger warnings. However, I also know that it is a power trip for some, due to social media, to bring someone down by making militant displays of offense, or for young people to see a powerful entity change something due to them. At some point though, I may have to conclude that they aren't virtue signalling for other motives, but are essentially religiously indoctrinated to, for example, not create beautiful things because someone out there could be jealous and feel inadequate or even kill themselves due to those feelings of jealousy (nevermind that said jealous person could have been taught "though shalt not covet" instead or that beauty is only skin deep, rather than lying about what's beautiful or vilifying those who create beautiful things or snuffing out the will to make beautiful things.)
Also, after seeing history repeat itself the past few years, and having more interactions with many different types of people, I realized that human nature hasn't actually changed just because we have more technology or more man made things around us, and that we aren't any different or more calm, moderate, and rational just because we are "modern." Those who strive for moderation had to have been raised or taught to value that. Even then, we are all susceptible to being swept up in passion or in others emotional manipulation. I also realized that institutions are made up of people foremost. Seriously, I recall feeling that "corporations" or "the government" were a powerful monolith when I was still in my public school bubble. Then after working for one I realized, "Oh, it's just people strongly or loosely following processes and cultures" set up before them and publicly facing through a brand or deliberate way of doing things (if it's a big established corporation). I gained an immense appreciation for the wisdom left by people from the past. Alot of ideas or values being pushed today as progressive aren't even new. "What's old is new again." So much for the Abe Simpson image too
Said old man could have actually been the creator of the "new old idea." Wisdom was painfully gained by people in the past and we can avoid the bad things being made new again.