made this for Matsumoto Ichika's birthday
The way a programmer is affected is different than artists. Artists will be replaced for about 99% of their work probably if not 100% and programmers will use it to get work done faster. There will probably always be a need for a human when using AI for programming, at the least to just clean up code etc... The shit AI DALL-E now pumps out trumps pretty much everything in this thread.
Edit : it is a lot more complicated than what i say here, and i was very harsh. I didn't erase the post so anyone can call me on it, but my "real" stance is the one on the post below.
Maybe it's a great analogy, just the opposite of what he meant
Toons
very aptly noted that AI art "provide no fulfillment for effort and no introspection" which are things he finds in his practice of drawing. Because that's what art brings to him. He's not a consumer who only cares about the finished product to consume and move on to the next. I realize i was harsh in my precedent post, and i'm sure that a lot of programmers find fullfiment into the effort they make to write code.
Maybe it's a great analogy, just the opposite of what he meant
Horses aren't used anymore for efficiency because we have more efficient tools at disposal. They are still used for a multiplicity of reasons, but most of all because human beings do stuff because they want to, sometimes just for the hell of it.
That is why both artists and programmers ten years from now will change, but keep existing. People who find coding fun will keep doing it, just not in a professionnal setting. I can see conventions and expos as a way to make money in the coding community going forward, not being paid to write code. People will do stuff that provides them fullfilment. The end result of art being more evident than a well coded program, imo artists will still find ways to earn doing commissions.
for now, coding is probably going away as you know it too, its gonna be even more high level and the job is gonna shrink as well.
not true at all, unless by digital you mean the "digital look"
You can. But I've already seen AI copy comic styles by digi-ink artists who mistakingly place everything only without much copyrighting. Similar to paper but nothing like it when you go animated. Especially cel painting. Think AI could take on the non-digital appearance of cel painting? From what I've seen...AI art resembles most of what people make on drawing tabs with software and airbrushing. Traditional art is much harder to replicate with the same authenticity.
And you're a pro.Just make sure to patent your work.
It probably can, is just a matter of what you want to train it for, the reason for so many illustrations from the AI programs lookinng similar is because there are popular sets of artists and styles that people find pretty, so they are popular and end up having more weight, i mean, in the end, these programs are just predicting what the concepts/prompts should look like, and they will only get better at that probably.You can. But I've already seen AI copy comic styles by digi-ink artists who mistakingly place everything only without much copyrighting. Similar to paper but nothing like it when you go animated. Especially cel painting. Think AI could take on the non-digital appearance of cel painting? From what I've seen...AI art resembles most of what people make on drawing tabs with software and airbrushing. Traditional art is much harder to replicate with the same authenticity.
By the way, nothing person. I've seen your work and know you can hold a pen if the software didn't boot up
Didn't you guys have ai shit thread already?
Really accurate. If you not sure if the art is Ai or not you can throw it in.
Lmao sensitive sensibilities.I wasn't aware. Sorry to offend your sensitive sensibilities.
I marked it as ai.
I was toying with this all week (Dalle3) and it's very clear to me that you need zero talent, skill or ambition to create 'art' with this. AI will taking existing copyrighted work and spit it out if you're proficient enough with your input triggers.
Calm down there. Who said if you started art by working with your hands and switch to digital you're no longer an artist? I'm talking about the people who've never touched a pencil in their lives, open an AI platform and throw some keywords in are being considered artists.
The idea of the thread is to show your own art, as in the art you made yourself, not on paper or hand drawn necessarily, but produced by yourself.I wasn't aware. Sorry to offend your sensitive sensibilities.
I marked it as ai.
Wow. I guess you win the internet. You really showed me..You wipe those tears first big boy
