ChorizoPicozo
Member
Did I said evil? I said a waste of time resources and that didn't make sense ≠ evilYes how evil of them to think about making another racing game, wtf?.
Because I didn't bring Sony in the first place. You did.Also how is using Sony as an example 'moving goal postsl?.
That's is not only bad example but you are proving my point:I used Sony as an example because they make a shit ton of 3rd person action games.
Let me put it in this way:
You are a racing fan, right? Whose catalog between Play Station and Xbox entices you the most?
I will assume Xbox. They are offering you a sim and arcady racing games.
Making another one will make you (a racing fan) happy. Correct?. 'You eating good'.
But if you are a 3rd Person Action Cinematic game...whose catalog is more enticing?
Play Station. Right?
Play station makes a shit tons of 3rd action games.....ok....if you a a fan or of those, you are eating good, more than good I would say. But if you like arcady racing games, PlayStation is offering jack shit.
See the point now?.
In other words:
MS doesn't need another racing game. (Especially when they are offering and arguably; the best ones in the market) even worst when the competition... Ain't
competing.
conversely, you could say that Play Station has too many 3rd Person games. And they lack at least a racing game to compete with Horizon.
hope this is clear.