Fogz said:Must have been very different to the rural areas where I've been living all my life
Lol, same.
In fact when we lived in Albury we didn't even bother locking our doors, you think anyone would try that in Sydney?
He's a nutter.
Fogz said:Must have been very different to the rural areas where I've been living all my life
OMG!! (((((Salazar said:Peter Roebuck found dead. Cripes.
wtf? My money is on assassination.Salazar said:Peter Roebuck found dead. Cripes.
Really? Complete opposite from my experience. Rarely heard of any thievery up home, especially since no one locked their houses, transportation, livestock up often. Everyone I know in the cities have had at LEAST one thing stolen from them.Lafiel said:To be honest, from personal experience in the rural areas of australia, the stereotype that australians = thieves is kinda true in a sense. Not so sure about the cities tho.
If you aren't playing it on PC you really would be doing yourself a disservice.Omi said:Just a quick mention of the insane concurrent player count on steam for skyrim. 10% of the total sales my arse.
Ferris wheel was actually fine this time. The inital fire fight after leaving the hotel though was fucked. Horrible level design and horrible spawn rate means the best option is flee to the buses and use them as a focus point before Forrest Gumping it to the nearby open building.Doncamatic said:All Ghillied Up's still fantastic too. Nothing in the way of challenging gameplay but it evokes the atmosphere of being a sniper so well. The next level after the shot is taken could have been great too if it wasn't for that standoff at the ferris-wheel.
Danoss said:So, you're a thief then?
Salazar said:Peter Roebuck found dead. Cripes.
Hate exams like that. They always make them 10x more complex since you have the benefit of knowing what you need to study going in. We never got 100% of the exam though, usually you would get 80% of the case study but also have no idea what questions they would ask. They would always ask complex questions.Jintor said:This equity law take-home exam is a hoot
and by a hoot I mean extraordinarily complex
Interesting that MW3 multiplayer has about half what the 360 has...Omi said:Just a quick mention of the insane concurrent player count on steam for skyrim. 10% of the total sales my arse.
Having finished MW3 yesterday (on 360, veteran) I can safely say that the checkpoints in that game are just as unevenly spaced out. There's one near the end wherereptilescorpio said:COD4. Lack of checkpointing during underground run near the end of the game is horrible.
http://www.skyrimnexus.com/codswallop said:Having finished MW3 yesterday (on 360, veteran) I can safely say that the checkpoints in that game are just as unevenly spaced out. There's one near the end wherethat I had to do multiple times simply because there's a long firefight afterwards. So frustrating.you blow a hole in the floor and take out the guys holding the president hostage
Oops... DP. Soo... are there any mods out for Skyrim yet?
codswallop said:Having finished MW3 yesterday (on 360, veteran) I can safely say that the checkpoints in that game are just as unevenly spaced out. There's one near the end wherethat I had to do multiple times simply because there's a long firefight afterwards. So frustrating.you blow a hole in the floor and take out the guys holding the president hostage
Dead Man said:
Yeah.Salazar said:I can't imagine how gutted the ABC blokes are.
I've had so much pleasure listening to Skull, Jim, Aggers, Harsha, Roebuck.
Interesting, where do you find out the xbox player counts and such?codswallop said:Interesting that MW3 multiplayer has about half what the 360 has...
They tell you right at the multiplayer menu how many other people are playing.Omi said:Interesting, where do you find out the xbox player counts and such?
reptilescorpio said:I wouldn't say ONLY Australians. It is pretty much piracy but you screw over another gamer as well.
hamchan said:They tell you right at the multiplayer menu how many other people are playing.
RandomVince said:In cases of piracy, its a digital download and the only loss is potential revenue to the publisher and retailer. It's not theft, and it's not "100% guaranteed loss of income" because we don't know if the pirate would have bought the game and no physical product is taken.
In the case where some dude walks into a shop and steals a CD key - that is categorically theft. The store either has one less product to sell once the key is used, or a customer unwittingly buys a product that cannot be used. And inevitably can't return the game to the retailer. So anyone who does that is a thieving piece of shit.
Also, anyone seen the xbox live prepaid cards with two levels of perforated tears and a peel sticker covering the code? CD keys for PC games need something like that to allow for returns or prevent cd key theft.
That is exactly what I meant. Not only are they not paying the publisher but they are also causing grief to another consumer who is unlucky enough to buy the game, get home, and find out they cannot play it without running through a process to get their cd key back from the person who stole it from JB.RandomVince said:In the case where some dude walks into a shop and steals a CD key - that is categorically theft. The store either has one less product to sell once the key is used, or a customer unwittingly buys a product that cannot be used. And inevitably can't return the game to the retailer. So anyone who does that is a thieving piece of shit.
I assume if COD Elite was working on PC you could look up the figures on your web browser. At least I hope they added that kind of functionality.Omi said:No web source? I don't own a 'modern' console
Jintor said:I'm glad to finally agree with you on something, Vince
Did you see the snow white and the huntsman trailer? I found it pretty meh.BananaArnie said:well im sad i was sleeping and missed out on first post of the page.
also coming up on 20k. who predicted it. good work.
might i suggest that we dont migrate till this one gets locked. pretty sure i can necrobump 3.0 still.
Kerrby said:This ones for Choc/Jintor.
ABC is beating Channel 10 in the ratings again, pushing them into 4th spot as ABC takes 3rd spot.
Channel 7 has won every single week of the ratings for the year, that's crazy.
Hopefully Channel 10 gets a shake up and puts something decent on it's station.
legend166 said:So I think some dodgy stuff is going to come out about the Roebuck situation, sadly.
RandomVince said:Why "hopefully"?
I'd love to see them go belly up along with 9 and 7.
midonnay said:Tiger woods making Allenby look abit silly. Brilliant eagle.
yes golf in ausgaf....deal with it
Kerrby said:Well "hopefully" because I'd rather them do something than nothing and get some good TV on there. That should be fairly obvious.
No at your last comment, won't happen (9 and 7).
legend166 said:So I think some dodgy stuff is going to come out about the Roebuck situation, sadly.
There is an ongoing police investigation into events surrounding his death and it is understood he was being questioned by police at the time.
Police have removed personal items from his room and took his body to the mortuary in the early hours of the morning.
In his diary of a season "It Never Rains'', Roebuck reflected upon how strange it was "that cricket attracts so many insecure men.''
"It is surely the very worst game for an intense character, yet it continues to find many obtuse sensitivities among its players,'' he said.
"Men of imagination, men of ideals risk its harsh exposures.''
A man from the New South Wales Central Coast is suing his local district health service after an alleged cancer misdiagnosis led to 80 per cent of his stomach being removed.
Graham Lord was diagnosed with an aggressive stomach cancer in late 2009 on the back of pathology results from the Gosford Hospital.
Mr Lord had most of his stomach removed and seven chemotherapy sessions.
Documents lodged in the Supreme Court say that doctors at Royal North Shore Hospital, where Mr Lord had the operation, told him he never had cancer in the first place.
Jintor said:Australian television is balls.
I agree, which sucks for the future of the sport.RandomVince said:My bet is on b, and not as him being a suspect, rather someone who unfortunately may have known too much.
I would prefer to see them all start to put high quality programs on.RandomVince said:Why "hopefully"?
I'd love to see them go belly up along with 9 and 7.
reptilescorpio said:I agree, which sucks for the future of the sport.
I would prefer to see them all start to put high quality programs on.
Australian television has one of the highest advertising content in the world. Prime-time can see 18 minutes or more of ads per hour. Furthermore, product ads wrapped up in informational content are labeled "public service announcements" and not included in the time restrictions; similarly with "this program brought to you by..." announcements, and station identifications. Consequently Australian viewers might see less than 40 minutes of actual program time per hour. Foreign, older television programs and movies are noticeably shortened; comedy shows often return from an ad break into laughter, for instance. Australia is also one of the few countries in the world where advertisements may appear prior to, and over the top of, the closing credits of a program.
RandomVince said:Same here. Speculation wise, do you think it has more to do with which of the following themes:
a) Drunken violence/one off incident
b) Match fixing
c) Personal problems
My bet is on b, and not as him being a suspect, rather someone who unfortunately may have known too much.
Fusebox said:The quality of the content is not the problem with Australian TV:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Television_advertisement
Not to mention shitty station watermarks getting larger more opaque and volume boosting ads which is done by reducing the volume of the actual show so they don't fall foul of the volume laws.
That's why I only watch Netflix, Hulu or torrents. Fuck Australian TV.
yeah thats how i knew whats her face was in it.roosters93 said:Did you see the snow white and the huntsman trailer? I found it pretty meh.
Fusebox said:The quality of the content is not the problem with Australian TV:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Television_advertisement
Not to mention shitty station watermarks getting larger more opaque and volume boosting ads which is done by reducing the volume of the actual show so they don't fall foul of the volume laws.
That's why I only watch Netflix, Hulu or torrents. Fuck Australian TV.
Da fuck? That really needs to be changed now that there are a hundred different psa companies hocking shit in advertising form.Furthermore, product ads wrapped up in informational content are labeled "public service announcements" and not included in the time restrictions; similarly with "this program brought to you by..." announcements, and station identifications.
They shoot for ratings unfortunately. The majority of the population are quite happy watching Celebrity The Apprentice or Home & Away. Maybe we need to hypnotise them into liking higher quality programming. Shaneus is correct, if Channel 9 are willing to scrape up the remains of Big Brother after it was tossed aside by the Australian public and ducked into pieces by 10 then I can't see them ignoring the shitty programming any time soon. Would be nice to actually use my TV for TV one day, aside from the odd bit of sport.RandomVince said:As would I, but I'm being realistic: the 3 commercial channels are digging for bottom.
The Conseil supérieur de l'audiovisuel allows up to 9 minutes of advertising per hour on average in a day. Private channels can only broadcast one commercial break if the show is less than an hour and two commercial break if the show is more than an hour. For public channels, the advertising is forbidden after 8 p.m and will completely disappear in 2012.
reptilescorpio said:Da fuck? That really needs to be changed now that there are a hundred different psa companies hocking shit in advertising form.
Not a number to be emulated, really.legend166 said:18 minutes per hour is the standard in America.