Sorry for the late reply... (was away.)
None of the links you gave me were about post 9/11 Saudi goverment funding of AQ and Deash.
Of course there are reporting about independent donors as well as Saudi Arabia and the promotion of Salafism but the later is another topic entirely about theology and ideology and the former was mostly curbed around 2015-ish and after.
I mean I can also rant about all the shit that happened under King Abdullah's reign but it isn't going to serve me anything when there is a new regime in charge.
Instead I rant about King Salman's reign.
See, this is what's wrong. You can't be an apologist for Saudi involvement in funding and weaponizing extremists by blaming it on individuals, while writing off the export of the disgusting wahhabi ideology (which has outright ruined multiple countries around the world now).
Also, nations usually fund controversial/sketchy groups through proxies to retain plausible deniability in case of geopolitical backlash. Saudi is really bad at it (or just doesnt really give a fuck), with people in their own government or the royal family pretty much doing it openly. This isn't something that suddenly changed after Salman came into power. The extremist and bloodthirsty mentality is woven into the Saudi foreign policy, and has been for decades.
How can a country that is supposed to be the epicenter of Islam have preachers running amok openly advocating for death of people around the world, and people who are part of their own religion no less?
I dont know about labeling anyone, but yea agreed to everything else. SA is honestly one of the most dangerous and shit stirring countries in the world, and them having any authority to dictate and project geopolitical power by accusing others of funding extremism is just hilarious. And scary.
I feel gross defending Qatar.