who are you talking toHyper probably isn't getting lynched dragonz he pocketed enough people with his diving in head first and actual paragraphs.
You should get in on this vote consolidating on others.
who are you talking toHyper probably isn't getting lynched dragonz he pocketed enough people with his diving in head first and actual paragraphs.
You should get in on this vote consolidating on others.
Wheresmahdragonz she just voted hyperwho are you talking to
It's going to have to happen sooner or later. Voting anyone but the "main wagons" at the end of the day is generally scummy.
It is a good idea to have a few people under real pressure backed by actual game mechanics (more than 1 or 2 votes) before the very end of the day so that in the event there is a claim or some other huge drama there is time to deal with it.
I am up for voting euphemism, Exodu5, MattyG, dusk... I want to work on a little consolidating.
i'm fine with those. Exodu5...eh. he's not on my list like the rest of them but i could be persuaded
sure why notAre you on board for a euphemism lynch from that one post?
Wheresmahdragonz she just voted hyper
Yes but your vote is a ripple and I want to see if we can work together to make waves. Who else would you vote?I voted hyper because I think he's scum. This isn't a political play.
Shit, I've been calling Dusk Dust this whole time. Sorry!
Yes but your vote is a ripple and I want to see if we can work together to make waves. Who else would you vote?
Yes but your vote is a ripple and I want to see if we can work together to make waves. Who else would you vote?
vote: Dust Soldierplease don't mod kill me this is a joke post
Are you high
just kidding
Vote: timetokill
i don't like how we suddenly stopped bringing him up
Shit, I've been calling Dusk Dust this whole time. Sorry!
noAre you high
i need to rethink some things
the past page or so needs re-read
Oh, Catvoca. Very disappointing and suspicious activity. To vote someone and then pull it immediately after a rant like Dragonz just posted, after you made such a good case.
After you do that let's you, me, cat, and kitty all vote dusk and see what happens. I think he's around.
is this a good one
maybeWow sorry Ouro I guess I should post nonsense half sentences to get my post count up
Who's cat? And it seems like you keep moving back and forth on people. Trying to start a bandwagon, huh.
Who's cat? And it seems like you keep moving back and forth on people. Trying to start a bandwagon, huh.
Yeah, you're doing great.
...and Euphemism didn't post for nearly a whole 24 hours from that point. Case closed!Euphemism, post if you're town.
I mean I still think Dragonz has acted scummy, I just think it's more productive right now to put pressure on less-active posters. If Dragonz is lynched and ends up flipping town it sucks since she's really trying to post and could be helpful to town. If Euphmism or Dusk or Matty flips town it doesn't really impact us, and there's about as much chance as them flipping scum as Dragonz no matter what my D1 reads are. Andsas I said, there was something about her response to me that seemed honest, and she was actually remarkably consistent based on her previous thoughts. I feel like scum might be more defensive or start changing their story a little when put under pressure but she was solid as a rock.
bat how bout a timetokill or retroid vote
can I convince you with snacks
?
Why do you keep lumping me in with the low-activity posters, when players like Stackpole, tomakas, Barry, and Retroid are MIA?
It feels like you're never involved in the discussion here. You had you're posts with Hyper and then it's mostly fluff. Like there's been a decent amount happening these last few pages and you don't comment on any of that. I think that's low activity. Maybe I should stop lumping you in with the people who have posted nothing recently though, you are a little different to those, you're not MIA.
I would rather make some progress on the more talked about people so that we can either find reasons to move on or lynch them and move on that way.
I guess what I am trying to say is, I don't like killing people day one, but if a role claim occurs, a day one kill might be okay. In order of what I would like to happen:
1. NK
2. Someone is clearly scum/detremental to town, kill them
3. Role Claim with Kill
4. Kill based on randomness
day one read lists
wow
day one reads list
i kinda forgot about retroid's adamant stance on no-lynching and how he's arguing that we can get information by doing so. now this is a bit of WIFOM but retroid knows that no lynching is more of a townie statement (in theory - i mean, what if you hit town? gasp) and he also should be aware of how silly his stance is. i don't like it.
he also is uncomfortable with my playstyle
what playstyle
sickreads and awesomeness are not a playstyle
it's a way of life
also he was on a team with blarg before, so i'm assuming we aren't on the same team here
this is just weird. like, what is #3 even supposed to mean
if we lynch someone today we have a chance to hit scum
if we don't lynch someone today we have no chance to hit scum
statistics boiiiiii
I'm not sure if that is true. In my first game my stance on day one left me with a lot of problems. Most people do like to kill on the first day.