I realize I haven't been posting much. I'LL getting in the way. Things are winding down so I should be able to participate more.
Currently, my main targets are WMD and Hyperactivity.
WMD'S claim is overly convoluted. However, we stand to get more information on day 3 would I vote to give WMD a pass until then.
Hyperactivitiy broke the tie and got AB lynched on day 1. Either bad luck, or he was protecting WMD. We have the most to gain from lynching Hyper. If he turns up scum, then we should immediately suspect WMD. If not, then it gives WMD more credibility.
Those are my current thoughts.
Gonna respond to this bullshit really quickly here.
Come day 1, you don't fucking lynch a claimed pr. You don't do it. Unless it's explicitly bullshit or self-contradicting, you don't fucking lynch the claimed pr.
I asked WAMD a question about her role, then refreshed constantly until about a minute and a half before the deadline, when I realized I wouldn't get an answer in time. So, at a minute before the deadline, I broke the tie.
I'm the bartender. I'm town. I'm not sharing anything about myself other than that. Town has nothing to gain from me revealing my role at the moment.
I was trying to get a no-lynch through a tie. If that didn't work, then I wanted to see what the final voters did. I had no firm opinion on either WMD or AB, so I was hoping scum would slip up at the end and make an obvious attempt to lynch a townie. In the end, this may or may not have been a good idea. Splinter is dead and was town. Hyper is the other one to break the tie, and is a scum suspect as a result.
Right now, my 2 suspects are Hyper and WMD. Hyper for the aforementioned tie break during day 1, and WMD for a very vague role description.
I saw what you said about how you wanted a tie in the votes. Well, I didn't. Me ensuring a tie in the votes would be stupid unless I was in the no lynch crowd, which I NEVER was in. You said it yourself, *Spinter was town, and he voted in the same minute I did, except I had now ay of knowing he would, and at that moment, I needed a lynch.
You can call it trying to lynch a townie, but looking back at the end of day 1 would be useless without an actual hard result we could look at.
Now, as for you, I'm annoyed that you seem to have decided to take the same approach you did day 1.
1) You seem to have decided for yourself that you not giving us any info on your role is bullshit. Sorry, but we have 0 reason to think you're town right now, and should you indeed be a town pr, scum are well aware of this.
2) You also are posting in the same manner as day 1. In day 1, you dug your trench in the no lynch camp, and then voted OMGUS for the rest of the day. During day 1, especially near the end of the day, I just assumed it was a frustrated townie/someone who really hates day 1s (which I've both seen and been before). But today, your suspicion on me AGAIN comes down to you being in the no lynch camp: yous et up a tie, and somehow you find that the person who made the move most of the players here would have made suspicious.
Vote: absolutbro
I'd rather see a tie or see who is brave enough to break the tie.
You trying to scout out who is "brave" enough to break the tie is just stupid, because you can look at every single end of day near tie as proof that 100%, players will break the tie. Because you had already put a comment saying that whoever broke that tie would be doing something to look at doesn't actually make it so.
You refusing to give any information about your role wouldn't even be so much of an issue if you you actually contributed past a few of the main topics being discussed. Your reads list comes down to topic #1 of today so far, and me, which I've already discussed.
And ironically enough, your suspicion of WAMD doesn't even try to consider the main defense I had for you yesterday: why does scum WAMD make her claim that convoluted?