Okay, you want a reason? I don't believe her claim. Same as my reason for suspecting her yesterday. The role is too complicated and feels like something that was made up in order to ensure that she claimed a neutral/town role while also ensuring that it wasn't something someone else would have.We are at 7/10 votes for majority. Next person who votes WAMD is asking for it.
Why don't all of you, rather than operating on suspicion from the past days, and the general trend (I can sneak in a vote for her), go justify a vote for her, IN the post you vote for her
Do you realize how meaningless a bandwagon consensus where anyone can post some bulllshit "yeah she's been suspicious, it's a gut read, I trust ttk and also barely pay attention to this game and want the day to be over" vote is? Especially compared to how much MORE useful today's vote would be if it was close, or there was a semblance of opposition to her vote, or if the people voting at least reasoned out for themselves why this votes should happen?
Also, I believe TTK (for now) because he has to know that if we lynch WMD and find out that her claim WAS legit, he's going to be the next one to be under heavy suspicion. Unless his role is to get WMD specifically lynched, TTK's claim would only fuck himself over long term.