And encrypted with GPG
In the middle of trimming his toenails with his mouth, in public of course.
And encrypted with GPG
Ahhh, okay. So it's more of a development environment thing? That makes sense. Should be good stuff. I guess it isn't super relevant to my workflow on an all windows network, since I spend a lot of my time remoted into a windows server, working in AD and in powershell. But this makes sense that it'd be a huge get to be able to work with git without installing anything else.
That is if MS allows you to use the bash shell to create directories outside the Linux "sandbox" (that isn't a sandbox) since they're allowing you to see C:/ and other letter drives in the Bash shell.
can elaborate on this walled garden?Doubt it'll run much Linux software all that smoothly but it would be awesome to have curl and ls work
(I use GitHub Shell for that currently)
In general: good on MS for chipping away at the walled garden.
you can do all that with powershell.In theory (and what I'm hoping for) you'll be able to use Bash to command-line things similar to *NIX/BSD, and OS X in regards to management and development. Instead of windows-only/command prompt commands you'll be able to learn one "shell"/command-line interface and use it across three OS's with no issues.
That is if MS allows you to use the bash shell to create directories outside the Linux "sandbox" (that isn't a sandbox) since they're allowing you to see C:/ and other letter drives in the Bash shell.
Well, if nothing else, it's a 50:50 chance whether I'll type 'dir' or 'ls' in an arbitrary command prompt, so shifting me one way or the other will save time half the time.
you can do all that with powershell.
I believe Codeacious is wrong; this blog post is from an MS employee showing it off:
http://www.hanselman.com/blog/Devel...ndUsermodeUbuntuLinuxBinariesOnWindows10.aspx
It's Ubuntu on Windows.
Good article on how the regular Windows command line is rubbish and why an improvement over it is necessary.
Well if it's true that you can't so much as launch notepad from Windows Bash; it's not really a command line / power shell alternative.
It's Ubuntu Bash running on Windows; without the ability to call any windows binaries.
GNU\WindowsSo is it GNU/Windows now?
Yeah it's not a full replacement, especially if you're a Windows system administrator and need actual system access from the command line. For a lot of developers, including myself, I'd assume it's as good as a full replacement.
Yeah of course; the article linked is talking about batch processes via the windows command prompt; which is really not a development tool or really related to this announcement.
Just thougth it was a strange thing to link to (and a strange article in general) and some of the conversations here in general seem a little off base considering it's not anything a windows system admin could really get much use out of.
Yeah it's not a full replacement, especially if you're a Windows system administrator and need actual system access from the command line. For a lot of developers, including myself, I'd assume it's as good as a full replacement.
GNU\Windows
This strikes me as like, WINE but the other way around. Such an unexpected piece of news.
Ehh... Idk, if all you can do is run gnu command line utilities, it certainly becomes much less useful. If anywhere in yoru script chain needs to shell out to, like, your compiler, the whole thing is shot. Literally all you can use it for is like grep, sed, awk, rsync, curl, wget, etc.
This strikes me as like, WINE but the other way around. Such an unexpected piece of news.
Ehh... Idk, if all you can do is run gnu command line utilities, it certainly becomes much less useful. If anywhere in yoru script chain needs to shell out to, like, your compiler, the whole thing is shot. Literally all you can use it for is like grep, sed, awk, rsync, curl, wget, etc.
But that compiled as a Linux binary inside the Linux subsystem. Won't work if you want to compile something for Windows.They demoed actually compiling a simple c program.
Not that I completely disagree with you.
Just run Wine from your Linux shell! (beware: universe may collapse)But that compiled as a Linux binary inside the Linux subsystem. Won't work if you want to compile something for Windows.
Pretty sure you can enter C:/Windows/System32 if you wanted in Explorer or cmd.About damn time.
Now reverse them slashes in the your path...
Sounds interesting. I wonder if this would be enabled by default, as bash has had some severe vulnerabilities.
Pretty sure you can enter C:/Windows/System32 if you wanted in Explorer or cmd.
I've been using git bash on windows for a while now, but an actual Linux subsystem would be really nice for development. Hopefully it's better supported than the old Unix subsystem.
They demoed actually compiling a simple c program.
Not that I completely disagree with you.
With what compiler?
Ehh... Idk, if all you can do is run gnu command line utilities, it certainly becomes much less useful. If anywhere in yoru script chain needs to shell out to, like, your compiler, the whole thing is shot. Literally all you can use it for is like grep, sed, awk, rsync, curl, wget, etc.
Microsoft has been on a roll lately.
Good decision.
DamnI believe Codeacious is wrong; this blog post is from an MS employee showing it off:
http://www.hanselman.com/blog/Devel...ndUsermodeUbuntuLinuxBinariesOnWindows10.aspx
It's Ubuntu on Windows.
Have you used a computer in the last 30 years? I worked at Microsoft for eight of them. Whatever you're trying to do with that snark, I am not interested.can elaborate on this walled garden?
Bashed my head against Cygwin until switching to a virtual machine. Could have used this 5 years ago, but I'm glad it's coming.