Well, I was at work at the time, so yeah... I didn't write that much. Hey, it happens.
And I'm sorry, but I don't see any in-depth rebuttal. You mean stuff like "The Phantasm cameo is good, and LMAO at someone trying to say it isn't" is an in-depth rebuttal? How so? Basically, he just says it's good, and LMAO I'm wrong. That's not really anything. Why would I response to that?
And then he says stuff like "But let's not pretend this episode is somehow objectively notable in its absurdity over people controlling plants with their minds, or talking gorillas with laser guns."
First of all, I never said it was objectively anything. I think it's pretty obvious that I was subjectively judging the episode according to my own personal standards, and by my subjective standards, the story was really fucking dumb. I never said that it was gonna be the dumbest thing in fiction, objectively, for everybody. Never said it once.
Secondly... yes, I do think this episode is notable in its absurdity over people controlling plants with their minds, or talking gorillas with laser guns. Poison Ivy and Gorilla Grodd are way less absurd. Their powers and origins actually do fit tonally within the context of their universe. I mean, maybe not in something like Nolan's film universe, but in a comic book, they both work. You can buy into the existence of a woman controlling plants with her mind, because of some serum or something. That is justified in the comic world. The comic world doesn't justify why someone intelligent would somehow hatch up a dumb project named "Project Batman Beyond," designed to recreate another Batman by randomly murdering some poor kid's parents. I mean gosh, is Amanda Waller gonna be hiding outside Terry's apartment with a bat, ready to throw it through the window and somehow inspire him to dress up as a bat? Is she planning for that as well? We're really gonna watch a fat Amanda Waller in black camo gear hiding outside Terry's fire escape with a dead bat in her hand, just waiting for the right moment to shatter his window and turn his anger into righteous Bat justice? Is that what we're talking about here? Cause this is dumb. This is real dumb. I can't believe how dumb you'd have to be to come up with a story like this. It's boggling my mind.
Amanda Waller is a hard nosed government official. She's supposed to be a pragmatist. So I really don't see why she'd ever embark on this crazy, nonsensical, goofy ass plan to somehow, magically, incomprehensibly, perfectly recreate another Batman. People react to their parents getting killed in any number of ways. Maybe seeing his parents die would turn him into a... gun control activist. Why would she think that Terry would follow Bruce Wayne's exact footsteps? Because Terry's parents had the same general mental state as Bruce's? Huh? Why would that mean anything? How does this work? Who could think that this plan would ever lead to anything?