• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

BBC: Corbyn suggests max limit to what people can earn, "somewhat higher than £138K"

Status
Not open for further replies.
His last sentences has a point.
Not to me. If you have a rare skill that people will pay to see, why not profit from it? I don't understand why you shouldn't be rewarded for your hard work. It's BS. This is a slippery slope so I wouldn't want this near me. Don't do this shit you all.
 

Exile20

Member
I understand what he is saying but I am not sure if having a max line would work. I see no reason to not look into it but that amount is really too low.

Some of these rich fuckers are filthy disgustingly rich tho. They could give two fucks about anyone else except padding their bank account. Fuck everyone so I can get that 5th jet and 10th vacation home.
 

danowat

Banned
Not to me. If you have a rare skill that people will pay to see, why not profit from it? I don't understand why you shouldn't be rewarded for your hard work. It's BS. This is a slippery slope so I wouldn't want this near me. Don't do this shit you all.

Pfffttt......there are thousands of key workers who's skills and services are invaluable to society who earn a pittance, while industry fatcats drag in more in a month than they make in a year.

Rewards are rarely related to hard work.
 

Dougald

Member
Why is it that liberal parties are composed of incompetent blubbering morons? I just don't get it.

JC isn't a Liberal, he's an old-school Socialist who fell through a time warp into 2016 from a 1970s British Leyland picket line
 

iFirez

Member
Most people won't even come close to that salary. If he was suggesting a cap at 40 or 50k we might have a serious issue but seriously it's over 100k.
 

Jezbollah

Member
Dear Arsene

I'm going to place into an effect a policy that restricts wages of footballers to £138k a year. It's my genius plan to ensure that our Gooners have a shot at winning the Premier League.

Hope that makes you happy.

Lots of love

Jeremy
 

Future

Member
Most people won't even come close to that salary. If he was suggesting a cap at 40 or 50k we might have a serious issue but seriously it's over 100k.

That's not that much if you are successful. And not even close to enough to live nicely on nice cities.

Worse, it just punishes people for succeeding. Why would anyone want this the second they achieve any success. Why would you want this if you are working hard moving up the ranks and about to achieve success? Why would you want this if you were in school in order to achieve success?

Moreover, companies still are going to make tons of cash. Is the expectation that they'd just hire more employees and give them all the same salary? Where is this money going to go?

When liberals get too liberal
 
The problem is there is no new blood.

Yeah, Labour is done. Started with Ed Mulligan and it's been on a irreversible slide since then.

They've lost key demographics which will be extremely hard to win back and they've made zero attempt so far.

Party is name only right now. It's just one huge scandal away from imploding.
 

Jackpot

Banned
It's not as damning as it sounds, but not by much. It's not the launch of some flagship policy but an off-the-cuff remark about a debate on policy that had no thought put into it.

Corbyn: We want to address the increasing wealth gap

Interviewer: How would you do that?

Corbyn: Dunno.

Interviewer: Would you introduce wage caps for top earners...?

Corbyn: Maybe.

Interviewer: What would be the limit?

Corbyn: Dunno. More than what I make (£138,000).​

So yes, he has torpedoed his own relaunch, and it does highlight how little thought goes into implementing solutions rather than vague railing against the government, and it is completely unenforceable for so many reasons, and it will probably sink like a stone, but it could be worse... I guess?

There are workable solutions to closing the wage cap, such as:

As tax justice crusader Richard Murphy puts it: ”A practical policy on high pay is to deny a company corporation tax relief on payment of all salaries of more than 10 times UK median wage." This is a workable proposal that Labour should certainly explore and – I would argue – adopt.
 
I support the idea that the highest earner/boss in a company should not be able to make more than 10-20 times what the lowest earner does in the same company.

If they want to raise their own sallary they have to raise the lowest salaries too. They would make that happen!
 

kmag

Member
Dear Arsene

I'm going to place into an effect a policy that restricts wages of footballers to £138k a year. It's my genius plan to ensure that our Gooners have a shot at winning the Premier League.

Hope that makes you happy.

Lots of love

Jeremy

The communist model does not work economically, we all realised that, but the capitalist model in the modern world also looks to be unsustainable. You cannot ignore individual interests, but I believe the world evolves slowly. The last 30 years have brought a minimum amount of money for everybody in the west, the next step, politically, would be a maximum amount of money earned by everybody.
Arsene Wenger, 2009

Arsenal manager Arsene Wenger has hit out at sports minister Richard Caborn's calls for a football wage cap.
Caborn wants controls on wages and is pursuing the matter with his counterparts across Europe.

But Wenger said sport should not be made a special case and restrictions should apply across society.

"You cannot say a sportsman should have a limited amount of income but a banker should get a £15m bonus for making a lot of money," Wenger told The Times.

Caborn wants to address the amount of money in sport that ends up in players' pockets but Wenger believes such a system is unworkable.

Wenger said: "If it is across the whole of society, I'm not against it but if it is just directed against football I don't agree with it."

The bold Arsene is a bit of a champagne socialist.
 

Phased

Member
I don't see a problem with this.

Tax the rich so much that their salary works out to 138k. 138k is more than reasonable, it's more money than the vast majority of the population will make over 3-4 years.

And watch as the rich leave the country in droves.

If the government just takes everything over a certain amount people have quite literally no reason to work past what will make them that amount. It actually would even out income though, if only because most companies and business owners would leave the country and take their jobs with them. Everyone would be equal in how poor they are.
 
I don't see a problem with this.

Tax the rich so much that their salary works out to 138k. 138k is more than reasonable, it's more money than the vast majority of the population will make over 3-4 years.

So you think that if you set the limit at 138k, and an executive is making 999k, the difference would be drawn out in taxes? I imagine the first thing that would happen is that his wage would cut to the cap.

Bye bye income tax revenues.
 

Dougald

Member
Yeah, Labour is done. Started with Ed Mulligan and it's been on a irreversible slide since then.

They've lost key demographics which will be extremely hard to win back and they've made zero attempt so far.

Party is name only right now. It's just one huge scandal away from imploding.

I'd actually bet on the Lib Dems winning an election before Labour manage it again at this point. Everything that made the party electable in 1997 has been demonised as neoliberal and evil, compromise be damned. Nobody who voted Tory in 2015 is going to switch their vote for todays Labour party
 
Or, we could, you know, reform our tax system.

Never in my long lifetime has this country needed an effective opposition more and the Labour leader is bleating about a maximum wage. Is it that hard to focus on the fact that people are dying, frightened and alone, on hospital trolleys because of this Tory government's attacks on the NHS? A stance that might actually win the party votes, you turtle's cunt?

In the name of everything that crawls and fucks, Corbyn. In the name of everything that crawls and fucks.

He's not out to win elections.
 
It's not as damning as it sounds, but not by much. It's not the launch of some flagship policy but an off-the-cuff remark about a debate on policy that had no thought put into it.

So yes, he has torpedoed his own relaunch, and it does highlight how little thought goes into implementing solutions rather than vague railing against the government, and it is completely unenforceable for so many reasons, and it will probably sink like a stone, but it could be worse... I guess?

Yeah it could be worse. Corbyn has said for a while he wants the parties internal discussions to be more public and to involve the nation in discussions before the party has even come up with a solid plan.

Theoretically it is a great idea but every-time it happens (like this situation) people jump on the discussions and media tries to force quotes like the one on this thread, meaning in the end it's not worth it.
 
How stupid is he? How will this win votes and advance a liberal cause? Why would he say this? Does he not have common sense?
The problem you have is assuming Corbyn even wants to win.

Seriously Corbyn just go, you're handing the keys of the country to the Tories for a generation.
 

Griss

Member
I'd be willing to see relative wage caps but not hard ones. A relative wage cap meaning you can only be paid, say, max 5 times the average wage of your company, including bonuses and value of shares etc.

A hard cap is terrible and makes corbyn look very silly.

The true answer is to fix taxation and the make it more progressive.
 

Zaph

Member
I suppose we should appreciate him sprinkling in some policy between his jam making and gardening.

He's only leader of the opposition. Can't expect too much.
 

Jackpot

Banned
In all my years in politics and public service, this is possibly the most stupid policy idea I have ever heard - and that's saying something. It is utterly awful in every respect, and the fact he even ponders it is staggeringly stupid.

1) it does absolutely nothing to help a single person get out of poverty. Nothing. Not a single persons life would be improved through this.

2) unlike raising taxes, it generates absolutely no extra income to help those who need it.

3) it is not the fixed salaries that are in issue with extreme wealth anyway. Take home pay is a small part of the problem - stock options, bonuses, capital investments, in work benefits. All of those are part of the income disparity and wouldn't be impacted by this.

4) it would be extremely easy to avoid, and in all likelihood would simply decrease our overall tax base.

It is not only a stupid idea, it does nothing to help anyone and would demonstrably harm the country. It's a child's response to the idea that income disparity is too great.

Cross-posting from UK OT because it made me laugh.
 

kmag

Member
To be perfectly honest as stupid, off the cuff and unworkable as it is, there is a reasonable school of thought in the post brexit, post trump world the plausibility what you said doesn't matter as much as showing the voters you are connecting with their anger.

Unfortunately Corbyn makes a poor populist, as he's for all his faults is unfailingly polite and that combined with the ill-thoughtout nature of his comments make him sound mealy mouthed. Him not having a good answer when asked about his own wages and just reflectively saying "oh it'd probably have to be higher than that" is a poor look.
 
Seriously Corbyn just go, you're handing the keys of the country to the Tories for a generation.

I've come to the conclusion that's what they want.

How much more fun it is to protest policies of the Tories whilst not having to provide serious alternatives themselves.

..sit there shouting from the opposition benches whilst waiting for the British people to be ready for a full blown socialist revolution that will never come.

Lunatic student union lefties the lot of them.
 

Bl@de

Member
"If we want to live in a more egalitarian society and fund our public services, we cannot go on creating worse levels of inequality."

Translation: "Give me money for expensive and ineffective public services! Gib! Gib! Fuck capitalism"
 

mlclmtckr

Banned
There needs to be a tax on wealth, not income.

That said there was a study done in the US that showed people don't get any happier from additional income above around 70k. I'm sure the number varies by location but it's not like people making millions per year are getting any marginal utility out of all that money.

I would like to see a top tax bracket of 100% at, say, 750k. And a minimum income of something like 40k.

But like I said the real inequality is already baked into net worth. Like Piketty said, there needs to be a global simultaneous tax on wealth.

So many people in this thread are worried about the rich people fleeing the UK. Maybe they will... but honestly fuck them. I mean they're useful for tax income but then again all they seem to do is look for ways to avoid taxes anyway.
 
I've come to the conclusion that's what they want.

How much more fun it is to protest policies of the Tories whilst not having to provide serious alternatives themselves.

..sit there shouting from the opposition benches whilst waiting for the British people to be ready for a full blown socialist revolution that will never come.

Lunatic student union lefties the lot of them.

Exactly, the guys's making fucking bank just sitting there spouting out pointless bollocks that doesn't have a hope in hell of being enacted.
 

twobear

sputum-flecked apoplexy
"If we want to live in a more egalitarian society and fund our public services, we cannot go on creating worse levels of inequality."

Translation: "Give me money for expensive and ineffective public services! Gib! Gib! Fuck capitalism"

The NHS is actually one of the more efficient health services in the world, in terms of the amount of money that's spent on it vs outcomes.
 

Randomizer

Member
Jesus talk about an over reaction to an off-the-cuff remark. Also it's not a bad idea in theory but perhaps would be better implemented through higher taxation brackets.

Income inequality is one of the biggest issues facing modern society. Wages of the highest earners has ballooned since the 80's whilst the middle and low earners has barely budged, just about matching inflation. He also mentioned increasing minimum wage to £10 per hour which would fantastic and give people a living wage.

I think Corbyn has great ideas but how he delivers them is often terrible. He needs to think before he speaks, especially when everything he says will be scrutinised and jumped upon by the right wing press.
 
Jesus talk about an over reaction to an off-the-cuff remark. Also it's not a bad idea in theory but perhaps would be better implemented through higher taxation brackets.

Income inequality is one of the biggest issues facing modern society. Wages of the highest earners has ballooned since the 80's whilst the middle and low earners has barely budged, just about matching inflation. He also mentioned increasing minimum wage to £10 per hour which would fantastic and give people a living wage.

I think Corbyn has great ideas but how he delivers them is often terrible. He needs to think before he speaks, especially when everything he says will be scrutinised and jumped upon by the right wing press.

It's a horrible fucking idea and deserves to be pounced on
 

numble

Member
There needs to be a tax on wealth, not income.

That said there was a study done in the US that showed people don't get any happier from additional income above around 70k. I'm sure the number varies by location but it's not like people making millions per year are getting any marginal utility out of all that money.

I would like to see a top tax bracket of 100% at, say, 750k. And a minimum income of something like 40k.

But like I said the real inequality is already baked into net worth. Like Piketty said, there needs to be a global simultaneous tax on wealth.

So many people in this thread are worried about the rich people fleeing the UK. Maybe they will... but honestly fuck them. I mean they're useful for tax income but then again all they seem to do is look for ways to avoid taxes anyway.
The study you are probably citing actually says that people are happier about life in terms of life satisfaction the more they make, but it will not make you have a happy attitude on a day to day basis:
http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2019628,00.html

But in the bigger view of their lives, people's evaluations were much more tied to their income. The more they made, the more they felt their life was going well. The survey asked respondents to place themselves on a life-satisfaction ladder, with the first rung meaning their lives were not going well and the 10th rung meaning it was as good as it could be. The higher their income, the higher the rung people chose. "Importantly, the same percentage increase in income has the same effect on evaluation for everyone, rich or poor alike, even though the absolute dollar amounts differ," the authors write. So every 10% rise in annual income moves people up the satisfaction ladder the same amount, whether they're making $25,000 or $100,000.
 

Silav101

Member
A wage cap would be one wonderful way to get all the experts out of your country, since those tend to be higher paid.

From the Brexit thread, it's not like you want to listen to them, anyways?
 

Baki

Member
I don't see a problem with this.

Tax the rich so much that their salary works out to 138k. 138k is more than reasonable, it's more money than the vast majority of the population will make over 3-4 years.

No it's not.

Can't afford private schools or a decent-ish house in London.

Also means you can kiss the idea of early retirement goodbye.

I'm semi-pro Corbyn.

But this idea is fucking nuts.
 
Jesus talk about an over reaction to an off-the-cuff remark. Also it's not a bad idea in theory but perhaps would be better implemented through higher taxation brackets.

Income inequality is one of the biggest issues facing modern society. Wages of the highest earners has ballooned since the 80's whilst the middle and low earners has barely budged, just about matching inflation. He also mentioned increasing minimum wage to £10 per hour which would fantastic and give people a living wage.

I think Corbyn has great ideas but how he delivers them is often terrible. He needs to think before he speaks, especially when everything he says will be scrutinised and jumped upon by the right wing press.

It is a bad idea..but just focusing on the bolded. This is why this man is an awful politician. He doesn't think. He doesn't consult anybody. He doesn't generate any buy-in to his ideas. He just doesn't know how to operate as a leader or even how run his own office. The number of stories about how inefficient and aloof he and his staff are suggests they'd struggle to run a small business.

The right wing press hardly have to try.
 
I don't mind him, and agree with him on most things, with a couple of exceptions.

All he's talking about here, I assume, is fairness. and amending the marginal tax rates so that by the time your earnings enter the higher brackets (hundreds of thousands per year) you get taxed a very high percentage. This is normal in most western, relatively wealthy countries.

I hope 'cap' is simply his way of dumbing this down, and I don't blame him, because I'm losing faith in the ability of the average voter to understand what marginal tax rates even are.
 

danowat

Banned
I think Corbyn has great ideas but how he delivers them is often terrible. He needs to think before he speaks, especially when everything he says will be scrutinised and jumped upon by the right wing press.

Maybe in principal, but in reality it's complete unworkable.
 
Why is it that liberal parties are composed of incompetent blubbering morons? I just don't get it.

Because all across the world, you all too often have the far left choose to push purity politics bullshit instead of working with the moderates to put a stop to the far right.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom