But not really. Let me explain. To use a metaphor, your point is that the stove cooks your food. I'm asking you how it works, and you keep telling me it cooks my food.
That's not really what I was asking, though. I know how oppression worked in the country's worst days. But can you explain to me how it works today? How society is 'set up' -- again that phrase -- today to favor white people?
Thanks for being patient with me.
On average blacks have a higher chance of having a higher allostatic load, but there will be blacks that have a lower allostatic load than a large percentage of whites and there will be whites that have a higher allostatic load than the majority of blacks. As far as I am aware there is no way of assigning allostatic load to a specific cause.How many white Americans suffer from allostatic load as a result of racial stress, or are whites privileged by not having to worry about that?
I have read a lot of this thread and still don't see an answer to how a white person born into abject poverty is unfairly privelidged."I haven't read shit and I have no intention of doing so. Ever."
The entire country was built on fucking over other cultures and whoever got off the boat last. It still is.
I have read a lot of this thread and still don't see an answer to how a white person born into abject poverty is unfairly privelidged.
On average blacks have a higher chance of having a higher allostatic load, but there will be blacks that have a lower allostatic load than a large percentage of whites and there will be whites that have a higher allostatic load than the majority of blacks. As far as I am aware there is no way of assigning allostatic load to a specific cause.
Applying averages and general rules that are not always true is pretty much the definition of a stereotype.
I have read a lot of this thread and still don't see an answer to how a white person born into abject poverty is unfairly privelidged.
I have read a lot of this thread and still don't see an answer to how a white person born into abject poverty is unfairly privelidged.
It would have seemed monstrous to a British or American soldier facing a mortar barrage, with his comrades dying around him, to be told that Russian casualties were many times greater. It would have been insulting to invite a hungry Frenchman, or even an English housewife weary of the monotony of rations, to consider that in besieged Leningrad starving people were eating one another, while in West Bengal they were selling their daughters. Few people who endured the Luftwaffe's 1940-41 blitz on London would have been comforted by the knowledge that the German and Japanese peoples would later face losses from Allied bombing many times greater, together with unparalleled devastation.
Do they get racially profiled? Will they serve out the same sentence for the same crime all other things equal?
The discussion about who is worse off reminds me of this from Max Hastings's new book Inferno: The World at War 1939-1945.
I think part of the problem is that people equate "privilege" with "luxury". Having privilege does not mean your life will be easy. I am a man. That means I have some unearned privileges that women do not have (higher pay for the same work, less chance of being sexually assaulted), but it does not mean my life will necessarily be easy. I can be born into abject poverty, but that doesn't change the fact I am safer walking down the street at night than any woman regardless of her economic status.
I beg to differ. More than a few people in this thread have said that it's grotesque to explain to a poor white person with all kinds of serious problems how privileged they are. And it reminded me of that quotation. (Edit: I don't mean to reassert the point. But you said that it was never being discussed to begin with, and I think it was. Don't feel obliged to respond to it.)No one is arguing about who has it worse. People are explaining the way that privilege affects different groups of people. Also, I responded to your request for a summary, did you read my post?
Which study? I was reading this study:So you disagree with the conclusions of the study?
Um. How many times have you heard white fever on TV? At the movies? And being blonde, brunette, redhead is irrelevant. Very few people are going to outright dismiss you because of your hair colour. It's your skin colour that is the biggest magnet of attention.
Okay. Hypothetically. Let's say that this does happen. As I'm sure it does. What does that white man or woman do after that? Go home and lament their existence? Or will they most likely just shrug it off and move on after a bit? Will they not have a massive amount of white people willing to give them a chance anyway?
This PSA is about America specifically and not any other country. I can guarantee you that it is not saying that white people are responsible for all the problems in the world. Some people are taking the video as an attack on white people. That is not the case. Rather the overarching message is saying that any group, no matter what colour, religion, gender, sex, etc; IF you are a majority. You DO have a responsibility and should try to help the minorities integrate into your society.
.
And lastly. I too am Canadian. That does not insulate me from racism and has not insulated me from racism.
I wanted to quote the poster who said that white priviledge isn't a global phenomenon, and if there is such a thing, is confined to western countries. You wouldn't find it in Asia. Ahem:
![]()
July/August 2010 ATLANTIC MAGAZINE
Rent a White Guy | Confessions of a fake businessman from Beijing -- The Atlantic
-- more in link
(Video) Chinese companies 'rent' white foreigners -- CNN
June 29, 2010 7:33 a.m. EDT
I beg to differ. More than a few people in this thread have said that it's grotesque to explain to a poor white person with all kinds of serious problems how privileged they are. And it reminded me of that quotation. (Edit: I don't mean to reassert the point. But you said that it was never being discussed to begin with, and I think it was. Don't feel obliged to respond to it.)
And yes, I read your post. Thank you for writing it.
I beg to differ. More than a few people in this thread have said that it's grotesque to explain to a poor white person with all kinds of serious problems how privileged they are. And it reminded me of that quotation. (Edit: I don't mean to reassert the point. But you said that it was never being discussed to begin with, and I think it was. Don't feel obliged to respond to it.)
And yes, I read your post. Thank you for writing it.
Which study? I was reading this study:
“Weathering” and Age Patterns of Allostatic Load Scores Among Blacks and Whites in the United States
Conclusions. We found evidence that racial inequalities in health exist across a range of biological systems among adults and are not explained by racial differences in poverty. The weathering effects of living in a race-conscious society may be greatest among those Blacks most likely to engage in high-effort coping.
No! cause it honestly can't and should not be described in such a manner.You seem like a smart fellow. Can you tell me in a few sentences how American society is set up to screw other cultures? This......is just restating the issue. I'm just asking you to give me a quick answer about how it works. From you.
I have read a lot of this thread and still don't see an answer to how a white person born into abject poverty is unfairly privileged.
DRUG TRAFFICKERS ARE NOT "MOSTLY MINORITIES"
Racial profiling is based on the premise that most drug offenses are committed by minorities. The premise is factually untrue, but it has nonetheless become a self-fulfilling prophecy. Because police look for drugs primarily among African Americans and Latinos, they find a disproportionate number of them with contraband. Therefore, more minorities are arrested, prosecuted, convicted, and jailed, thus reinforcing the perception that drug trafficking is primarily a minority activity. This perception creates the profile that results in more stops of minority drivers. At the same time, white drivers receive far less police attention, many of the drug dealers and possessors among them go unapprehended, and the perception that whites commit fewer drug offenses than minorities is perpetuated. And so the cycle continues.
Today does refer to June 7th 1999 however it's still relevant today. The numbers could be slightly less or slightly more now. But These inequalities are still happening today[hence this thread]The consequences of these law enforcement practices and sentencing policies are painfully evident today in the demographics of our prison population. According to an April 1999 report prepared for the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights by The Sentencing Project, there are now an estimated 400,000 inmates in the U.S. either awaiting trial or serving time for a drug offense, out of a total inmate population of 1.7 million. "The combined impact of increased drug arrests along with harsher sentencing policies has led to a vast expansion of drug offenders in the nation's prisons and jails," the report explains. "As these policies have been implemented, they have increasingly affected African American and Hispanic communities. The African American proportion of drug arrests has risen from 25 percent in 1980 to 37 percent in 1995. Hispanic and African American inmates are more likely than non-Hispanic whites to be incarcerated for a drug offense."
Today, blacks constitute 13 percent of the country's drug users; 37 percent of those arrested on drug charges; 55 percent of those convicted; and 74 percent of all drug offenders sentenced to prison.
But would people want to give up that privilege?
That isn't privilege though, you are talking about disparities between races, caused by historical racism and continuing racial profiling and institutionalized racism.On behalf of people of color, i'm sorry that the fact that us being underprivileged minority is such a complex topic that its in convenient for some of you to understand it in a concise sentence.
Ok seriously though the struggles that people of color has gone though is basic grade school knowledge, And shit the secondary education system is horrible at truly explaining how race has been in America besides basic topics and events on slavery and civil rights movement. It's honestly not hard and people in this thread has gave copious amounts of information for you to get a better understanding. All you have to do is give in the attempt to read/watch the information actually given to you. I'm not even try trying to be kind on this cause it really burns me that people can't grasp the basic concept of this.
There is a great PBS Program called Africans in America that helps describe the African American experience in history --> http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/aia/home.html
I believe someone posted the book "The New Jim Crow" And Tim Wises[A name that has appeared in this thread countless times] Book Colorblind: The Rise of Post-Racial Politics and the Retreat from Racial Equity
You can look up studies on DWB[ Driving while black] and the amount of people wrongfully pulled over for the color or their skin[And if you'd like i can give you personal testimonies from myself and my family members about their experiences being pulled over for wrongful reasons]. It doesn't take much more than an effort to honestly read, watch and listen. Use the information given in this thread and use it as a tool to educate yourself as well as other people.
That isn't privilege though, you are talking about disparities between races, caused by historical racism and continuing racial profiling and institutionalized racism.
You mean that white folk are privileged not to have to deal with those things?
You mean that white folk are privileged not to have to deal with those things?
Are whites unfairly privileged, or are blacks unfairly underprivileged?
LOL, I had a conversation with an Arab guy in the financial business. He told me a partner of his (Arab) had a business meeting in the Middle East. The partner put his white driver in a suit and bought him to the meeting to make things more legit. Sounds like a comedy.Are you serious? Based on the color of your skin, you are seen as the boss and give "true" legitimacy to an entire company. BASED ON THE COLOR OF YOUR SKIN.
No Asian, Hispanic, or black person would get that offer.
Good, because there is an adult discussion being had.This is probably going to be my only post in this thread, I will more than likely get banned if I continue.
I was under the impression that you didn't see race.I wished I was white many times, if for no other reason than that it's soooo much easier to get laid if you're white.
I ask this 100% genuinely.. hypothetically, could this distinction ever be drawn? if so, how? shit's just too fucked up.I love the whole "I HAVE NEVER GOTTEN ANYTHING FROM THE COLOR OF MY SKIN" statements that pop up... the 400 year headstart still applies in America today. Has it gotten better? Yes. Is it close to fair, yet? No..
I love the whole "I HAVE NEVER GOTTEN ANYTHING FROM THE COLOR OF MY SKIN" statements that pop up... the 400 year headstart still applies in America today. Has it gotten better? Yes. Is it close to fair, yet? No..
I ask this 100% genuinely.. hypothetically, could this distinction ever be drawn? if so, how? shit's just too fucked up.
What if I’m a first generation immigrant who lives in a place populated by Indian and Chinese first generation immigrants?
What if Im a first generation immigrant who lives in a place populated by Indian and Chinese first generation immigrants?
What if Im a first generation immigrant who lives in a place populated by Indian and Chinese first generation immigrants?
What if Im a first generation immigrant who lives in a place populated by Indian and Chinese first generation immigrants?
But in the grand scheme of 'privelidge' the gulf between the life that a billionaire lives and that of an impoverished family is so vast that the differences between a poor white person and a poor black person are practically undetectable when measured on that scale.You mean that white folk are privileged not to have to deal with those things?
almost 500 years of inequality is a lot of ground to make up.. Not happening in 50 years of near equality.
But in the grand scheme of 'privelidge' the gulf between the life that a billionaire lives and that of an impoverished family is so vast that the differences between a poor white person and a poor black person are practically undetectable when measured on that scale.
But in the grand scheme of 'privelidge' the gulf between the life that a billionaire lives and that of an impoverished family is so vast that the differences between a poor white person and a poor black person are practically undetectable when measured on that scale.
But in the grand scheme of 'privelidge' the gulf between the life that a billionaire lives and that of an impoverished family is so vast that the differences between a poor white person and a poor black person are practically undetectable when measured on that scale.
I just mean a world where white privilege doesn't exist. I realize now that this was stupid.What distinction do you want drawn?
almost 500 years of inequality is a lot of ground to make up.. Not happening in 50 years of near equality.
What if you are? Does this have something to do with white privilege or are we just positing interesting hypotheticals? What if I'm the first white man on Mars and all the Martians look down on me? Where is my privilege then?
If you live in New York city, you still have the privilege of not having your constitutional rights violated on a daily/weekly/monthly/yearly basis by the police who - were you black or brown - might stop and search you without probable cause.
I love reading this thread and watching people do fucking Hot Wheels stunts to avoid the realities of their privilege.