EDIT: I should mention that there was a movement of illustrators here in Flanders coming up with ideas to correct the image in question.
I'm sorry, but that rework is a fail. He is supposed to be a pure African and in the rework he looks like a mixed race Brazilian.
As much as sensitive progressives like to pretend otherwise, Africans (apart from Ethiopeans and Eritreans) have significantly larger lips than whites and their noses are flatter and wider with a lack of a prominent bridge.
If you are drawing black people and then make their facial features more "white" for the sake of not offending as has been done in that rework above; then what you are doing is called whitewashing black people and asserting that there is something wrong or bad with having true African features, such as large lips, tightly coiled hair and flatter noses.
Also, black people vary significantly in skin tone. Saying that no black people have an almost fully black skin tone is wrong. There are west Africans that have extremely dark skin, very close to black.
If you are going to draw a black person, you can't just give them the same facial features as whites and only darken their skin; that will make them look like Indians or Arabs as opposed to Africans.
Take a look at Paul Pogba's face compared to that of Griezmann. Look at their faces from the front and in profile. There is a massive difference in Pogba's lip size compared to that of Griezman. In profile, Pogba's mouth and lips also protrude far further outward past the rest of his face compared to Griezmann. That is typical of pure monoracial Africans. It is biological reality.
The black man in this cartoon did look ridiculous, I agree. That mouth is extremely exaggerated and looks like a beak, as other have stated. But the answer to this problem is not to draw black Africans to look like whites, because they don't look like whites.