• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Belgian pedophile/child killer Marc Dutroux is denied parole

Status
Not open for further replies.
Marc Dutroux must remain in jail, Belgian court rules

Court rejects child killer's appeal for conditional release after his mother, Jeanine Dutroux, 78, warns her son will murder again

Marc-Dutroux-008.jpg


Marc Dutroux, right, was sentenced to life imprisonment in 2004 for the kidnap and rape of six girls and the murder of four of them. Photograph:Yves Logghe/AP

Belgium's most notorious child killer, Marc Dutroux, will not be released from prison early, after a court rejected his request to be placed under house arrest.

The court's decision came shortly after his mother, Jeanine Dutroux, 78, publicly called for him to remain in jail, telling Le Soir newspaper she was "certain he will start again" if freed.

It was the first time she had spoken since her son was convicted nine years ago of kidnapping and raping six girls, four of whom died.

"Marc is not ready to be released because he is still trying to blame others for what he did. I am certain he will start again. He has no sense of reality. He's a repeat offender in his soul, as he has already proven throughout his life," she told the paper.

She added: "Sooner or later he will be released, but I hope to be no longer in this world when that happens."

Dutroux, 56, was sentenced to life imprisonment in 2004 for the kidnap and rape of six girls between June 1995 and 1996, and for the murder of four of them.

Belgian law allowed him to request conditional release on 30 April, when he will have served a third of his 45-year prison term, including the time spent in prison awaiting trial.

Dutroux, who was arrested in 1996, insisted he was no longer a danger and wanted to be released under house arrest with the condition that he wears an electronic bracelet.

The prospect of his release provoked outrage in Belgium, which is still affected by what many consider to be the worst sexual crimes in its history.

As well as outrage over the nature of Dutroux's crimes, there was public fury over mistakes in the investigation. Belgian police had visited the property where Dutroux was holding two of his eight-year-old victims without finding them. The girls were later found to have starved to death.

In 1998 the killer escaped during a court visit. Although he was quickly recaptured, the country's police chief, justice minister and interior minister resigned over the blunders.

In August last year there were angry demonstrations when Dutroux's ex-wife Michelle Martin, convicted as an accomplice, was given a conditional release after serving 16 years of a 30-year sentence She now lives in a convent.

Several of Dutroux's victims have protested to the European court of human rights against the country's rules on conditional release of prisoners.

Laetitia Delhez, held for six days by Dutroux in 1996 when she was 14, her mother and Jean-Denis Lejeune, whose daughter Julie was found dead in Dutroux's home, want courts to be forced to consult victims before agreeing to the release of sex offenders.

Dutroux and Martin were jailed in the 1980s over the kidnap and rape of five young girls. They were freed early on good behaviour but went on to attack again.

According to Belgian newspapers citing official documents, Dutroux's appeal involved several issues: the likelihood that he would not find work, the question of where he would live, the risk that he would contact his victims given his "lack of compassion towards them" – Belgian newspapers reported that Dutroux told detectives he had "treated the little ones with humanity" – and the risk that he would reoffend.

Knowing that he is unlikely to find anyone to employ him, Dutroux has said he wants to become a freelance plumber or panel beater if released.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/feb/18/marc-dutroux-child-killer-mother-jail
 
Yeah they say he hasn't changed one bit.

Why the hell does he even want to be free? Surely he understands he won't make it till the next day?
 

ShinNL

Member
I hope your Belgians keep him locked. I know the Dutch justice system is a lot more leaner than I want it to be, to the point of naivety.
 

Kabouter

Member
I hope your Belgians keep him locked. I know the Dutch justice system is a lot more leaner than I want it to be, to the point of naivety.

The Dutch justice system has life in prison without the possibility of parole, which Dutroux would certainly have received had he committed his crimes here and been convicted under Dutch law, you're saying you wouldn't be satisfied until the death penalty is reintroduced?
 
The Dutch justice system has life in prison without the possibility of parole, which Dutroux would certainly have received had he committed his crimes here and been convicted under Dutch law, you're saying you wouldn't be satisfied until the death penalty is reintroduced?

Life in person with parole would be perfect.

Instead of what happened:
In February 1986, Dutroux and Martin were arrested for abducting and raping five young girls. In April 1989, he was sentenced to thirteen and a half years in prison. Martin received a sentence of five years. Showing good behaviour in prison, Dutroux was released on parole in April 1992, having served only three years, by Justice Minister Melchior Wathelet. Upon his release the parole board received a letter from Dutroux's own mother to the prison director, in which she stressed concern that he was keeping young girls captive in his house - which was essentially ignored.
 
Shocking development!


No but really, he isn't getting out. Everyone knows it, and I assume, he himself as well. But every prisoner has the right to ask for parole, so that's what he does. His motives for doing so, one can only imagine. Delusion? Provocation?
 

ShinNL

Member
The Dutch justice system has life in prison without the possibility of parole, which Dutroux would certainly have received had he committed his crimes here and been convicted under Dutch law, you're saying you wouldn't be satisfied until the death penalty is reintroduced?
But that's a rarity. Every other sentence we have is considered super short, especially if you look at how luxurious our prisons are.

I've almost never seen myself agree with any life-destroying crime sentences here (rape, murder).
 

Dany

Banned
In February 1986, Dutroux and Martin were arrested for abducting and raping five young girls. In April 1989, he was sentenced to thirteen and a half years in prison. Martin received a sentence of five years. Showing good behaviour in prison, Dutroux was released on parole in April 1992, having served only three years, by Justice Minister Melchior Wathelet. Upon his release the parole board received a letter from Dutroux's own mother to the prison director, in which she stressed concern that he was keeping young girls captive in his house - which was essentially ignored

That is incredibly backwards. Good behavior? Can people change, do they deserve a second chance? After raping 5 girls I don't think they do.
 

Kurtofan

Member
Dutroux and Martin were jailed in the 1980s over the kidnap and rape of five young girls. They were freed early on good behaviour but went on to attack again.

Yikes,I'm for rehabilitation but that's fucked up.
 

Skeyser

Member
Sorry but after raping and murdering 6 little girls (or anyone) you deserve to spend the rest of your life in jail. Parole shouldn't even be an option.
 

Feature

Banned
The Dutch justice system has life in prison without the possibility of parole, which Dutroux would certainly have received had he committed his crimes here and been convicted under Dutch law, you're saying you wouldn't be satisfied until the death penalty is reintroduced?

I'm not. He should be executed.
 
Lock him up for life and throw away the key.

This is a terribly shortsighted suggestion, and I'm tired of people making this thoughtless comment.

How are the authorities supposed to get his body out if we throw away the key? So irresponsible. It's just not practical.
 

Takuan

Member
They made the right call. There are certain things that no amount of rehab or community service can make up for.
 
Would they have released him if his mom didn't warn them ?
According to Belgian newspapers citing official documents, Dutroux's appeal involved several issues: the likelihood that he would not find work, the question of where he would live, the risk that he would contact his victims given his "lack of compassion towards them" – Belgian newspapers reported that Dutroux told detectives he had "treated the little ones with humanity" – and the risk that he would reoffend.
 

GraveRobberX

Platinum Trophy: Learned to Shit While Upright Again.
Why is he getting parole in the first place?

The thing he did was a heinous crime

Parole is given to those who can still benefit/function in society in some way no, that didn't commit heinous acts?

"You do the crime, you pay by time" (I think that is the saying)
 
Why is he getting parole in the first place?

The thing he did was a heinous crime

Parole is given to those who can still benefit/function in society in some way no, that didn't commit heinous acts?

"You do the crime, you pay by time" (I think that is the saying)
Belgian parole law allows convicts to be released after only one third of their prison sentence has been served.
 

Kurtofan

Member
Why is he getting parole in the first place?

The thing he did was a heinous crime

Parole is given to those who can still benefit/function in society in some way no, that didn't commit heinous acts?

"You do the crime, you pay by time" (I think that is the saying)

I'm guessing all prisoners get parole, you can't make exceptions in the law.
 

Daeda

Member
But that's a rarity. Every other sentence we have is considered super short, especially if you look at how luxurious our prisons are.

I've almost never seen myself agree with any life-destroying crime sentences here (rape, murder).

if you solely view the function of prison as a punishment for crime, then sure, Spartan cells are the way to go. If you see prisons as functioning in order to take someone out of society until that person is no longer a treat/can be functional to society, then having prisons that ensure people can function again when they come out are better. See also Scandinavian prisons, which are luxurious even by our Dutch standards but result in very low recidivism. If you ignore revenge as a legitimate function of a prison, then that is actually better for society as a whole.

As for Dutroux.. he should be treated equal to other prisoners, thus he has the right to appeal for this. It should be obvious he's never going to get out, seeing as the man is still a complete psychopath.
 

Feature

Banned
Just some extra info on this disgusting piece of human waste:
He has no access to television so he has a lot of subscriptions to magazines and newspapers. From the info in there he plays the stock exchange. To make sure nothing of the money goes to his victims, he's got the money on his brother's account and he calls his brother up from jail telling him where to invest his money in.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom