• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

BHM: A lot of freed slaves did not take their slaver's last name

Status
Not open for further replies.

Trojita

Rapid Response Threadmaker
A lot of people take it as common knowledge that if a black person has an English last name that it must have been a slave name forced on them that they kept. It's taken as fact, even by people that believe they have a slave name. For some people this couldn't be further from the truth.

I mostly came through this knowledge myself when researching awhile ago whether African slaves, many of whom were slaves in Africa itself (Western, Northern, Sub-Saharan, Horn, and Arab Slave Trade), whether they had actual surnames while slaves in Africa. I still haven't found a conclusive answer on this. Many people know of the story Kunta Kinte from Roots, who had an african surname, but the character is largely fictionalized, plagiarized from a fictional book, and mostly historically inaccurate. What compounds issues is that some of the locations and tribes in Africa may have had actual chattel slavery and some might have had a system closer to servitude. It would be interesting to talk to a Griot, for those that don't know they are like a historian mixed with a bard, with knowledge of pre 1850's African genealogy, but any if they exist are rare.

Back to what I made this topic about:

Some good reads:
http://www.wessyngton.com/blog/2009/08/surnames-used-by-african-american-slaves/
http://www.theroot.com/articles/culture/2013/11/tracing_black_last_names_advice_for_finding_slave_roots.html
http://rootsrevealed.blogspot.com/2012/04/aint-gonna-take-massas-name.html

With the abolition of slavery, many black people had the opportunity to start their life anew and choose their own surname. While it is true that some adopted the name of their former owners, this was not always the case. Some chose surnames based on their occupation, while others used names of prominent local and national figures. Other surnames were based on family members’ given names, or even the name of a nearby town or place. Some newly freed slaves named themselves Freeman or Freedman. Some freed people that were freed by a slave owner before abolition were given a last name by their previous owner. Some African slaves even kept last names secret from their slave owners.

The given names portion is easy to understand, basically a Freed person would take their first name and then their surname would be either their father or mother's first name.

"Although it is not widely known, some African Americans used surnames before they were emancipated. This happened mostly on large plantations where several individuals had the same first names and a surname was used to distinguish them from one another.
African Americans were known by these surnames in the slave community and often recorded by slave owners on plantation documents."

"In small communities where census takers and county officials knew African Americans personally and their previous owners, they often recorded the former slaves with the surnames of their last owners. One former slave Bill Scott from Wessyngton reported in his pension application for military service that when he enlisted in the Union Army officials put down his surname as Washington. He stated that he had always been known by his father’s surname Scott, even before he was freed."
"Former slaves often made up surnames based on their occupations. A Wessyngton slave named Bill who was the plantation’s blacksmith was known as Billy the Smith during slavery. After emancipation, he became William Smith. Another slave named Bill who attended the sheep became Bill Shepherd."
"One of the most common and often erroneous presumptions is that when enslaved African Americans were emancipated during and after the Civil War, a vast majority retained the surnames of their last enslavers. Many freed African Americans not only chose different surnames after slavery, but many had surnames on farms and plantations that were concealed from most slave-owners. In The Black Family in Slavery and Freedom, 1750-1925, historian Herbert Gutman quoted the following from the 1865 diary of Eliza Frances Andrews, a slave-owner’s daughter in Georgia:"

“I notice that the negroes seldom or never take the names of the present owners in adopting their ‘entitles’ as they call their own surnames, but always that of some former master, and they go back as far as possible.” (pg. 256)

I researched the slave narratives of Mississippi to test Eliza Andrews' observation. My research findings appear to corroborate her claim to a degree. Eighty-one African-American men from Mississippi were interviewed with only two of the interviewees not disclosing the name of their last enslaver. Of the 79 men who disclosed their last enslavers’ full or last names, 57% of them did not take their surnames. These are the results of my findings:

MISSISSIPPI
Surname Pattern Number Percentage
Same surname as last enslaver 35 43%
Different surname from last enslaver 44 57%
Total number of interviews 79

I'll admit that it is a small but not wholly insubstantial polling size.

Former slaves often used surnames names of historical figures such as Washington, Jefferson or Jackson. Others who wanted no connection to their former owners used surnames like Freeman or Freedman. In these cases, unless the name change had been passed down in the family by oral history, it would be impossible to trace the family back any further. This is another instance of oral history being a key component in tracing African American ancestry.

Hopefully this was educational for some people, those unfamiliar with American and African History, people well studied in the area but never saw this mentioned in detail, or people of African descent that haven't traced back their genealogy.

Note: Sorry if I used quotes too much near the end. There's a lighting storm out right now.
 

Mael

Member
Didn't know about that.
Good info, thanks for thread!
Makes the part about Malcolm X not wanting to use his "slave" name in a different light, although you can't really tell though.
 

Trojita

Rapid Response Threadmaker
Forgot to mention that anyone doing a genealogy lookup on their ancestry and hit a roadblock, some slaves were given as betrothal gifts to a marriage partner (I know it's fucking gross) and sometimes slaves were "given" the last names of the marriage partner.
 

Guevara

Member
That's interesting.

There's also the other great American myth about names, that immigrants coming through Ellis Island had their names Americanized. That didn't happen either (these names would already have been recorded on passenger manifests) in their home countries.

I'm glad to hear former slaves were able to chose their own names, can you imagine the indignity of having to take a former master's name?
 

Newline

Member
Huh, i'm mixed race (British and Jamaican), I have a British name from my Jamaican father but I always assumed that was due to him inheriting a slavers name. I've never actually considered other options. I often explain to people why I have a British name too. Thanks for the read OP, i'll be sure to keep that in mind. I'd love to dig deeper into the history of that side of my family.
 
This is how many peasants, merchants, and non-royals created their last names in Europe hundreds of years ago as well. Real interesting.
 

Zekes!

Member
Didn't know about that.
Good info, thanks for thread!
Makes the part about Malcolm X not wanting to use his "slave" name in a different light, although you can't really tell though.

Nah, I think his argument still stands. Even if freed slaves chose their own name, at that point they've been far removed from our original homeland and culture and the only options for names would be the dominant European ones
 

deadlast

Member
I was thinking about this earlier today when I was reading about Morgan Freeman. I assume slaves weren't too fond of former owners, so I had always assumed the took names that described them or names of Union figure heads.
 

Trojita

Rapid Response Threadmaker
Would surnames of Blackman or Blackmon be similar as Freeman or Freedman as far as choice is concerned?

I'll be honest and I'm not sure due to the conflicting nature that Blackman was also used by Europeans as a surname as well (oddly enough based on the spelling it could mean having darker complexions or the opposite aka pale).

It would be interesting if Ras Shorty or Dame Grease's genealogy lookup could reveal the origin. Tried to also lookup Sir Courtney Blackman's history but there isn't anything to suggest where the last name originated.
 

Mael

Member
Nah, I think his argument still stands. Even if freed slaves chose their own name, at that point they've been far removed from our original homeland and culture and the only options for names would be the dominant European ones

It's a difficult topic, I'd say I'd prefer if it was names of their choosing rather than of the callous pieces of crap that decided(or were forced) to stop the monstrosity they were enacting.
In a sense the surname they choose for themselves and their descendant is closer to the given name they choose for their children.
I know that it would be something I would treasure more than if it was just the name imposed on my family.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom