I would hold off accepting any final conclusions presented in the OP as "true" for the time being. There are large swaths of unexplained things still. Keep digging.
If Booker and Comstock's timelines run parallel, and they are the same age, does that mean it took 20 years for the Luteces to contact Booker to get Liz back?
The plot thickens?huh, the songbird in Bioshock is weird... Reading the comments you can only hear it in the IGN video, you can't hear it in this video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JG5fg8dxaS8
The plot thickens?
Theoretically, since the date of the sale of Anna in 1893 is such a key figure in terms of the multiverse for Booker, it's possible that some memory leak/remnant exists as sort of a deja vu moment to concern Booker with Anna's being in her crib.
I still don't understand how babtism leads to racism.
Tomorrow they release a small patch for BS1 which adds the Songbirds cry to that scene.
I still don't understand how babtism leads to racism.
"In front of all the men, the sergeant looked at me and said, 'Your family tree shelters a teepee or two, doesn't it, son?' This lie, this calumny, had followed me all my life. From that day, no man truly called me comrade. It was only when I burnt the teepees with the squaws inside, did they take me as one of their own. Only blood can redeem blood."
huh, the songbird in Bioshock is weird... Reading the comments you can only hear it in the IGN video, you can't hear it in this video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JG5fg8dxaS8
I still don't understand how babtism leads to racism.
Not talking just about the bumper. People seemed to have settled on something that's too simplistic for what's presented. There are some major oddities towards the end of the game.
Ok it's totally an April Fools joke by IGN. HAS to be.
We have to drown thomasmahler in case he decides to be reborn as BruceLeeRoy.
I still don't understand how babtism leads to racism.
Maybe Ken only put the Songbird cries in the code of some copies of Bioshock, to signify the number of timelines in which Booker never made it that far?
BruceLeeRoy, you are amazing. Thank you!!
Ok it's totally an April Fools joke by IGN. HAS to be.
It was posted back in august. How could it be?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=He84jP5Nuqk
0:52, exactly the same screams in the background, in a non-IGN video, uploaded January last year.
I think this is legit, people.
Songbird is likelier to appear in the sky above my house after I finish typing this post than for him to have been a part of Bioshock 1 outside of re-purposed sound effects.
Only recommend change I'd make to the OP... and I don't have the answers, I'm just underlining a potential issue... is I'd ask The One Who Knocks to maybe rewrite his explanation of the ending in the very first question in the OP. I recall seeing him explain it better in subsequent posts. The bit that was quoted was rambling and hard to follow at times, and I know he can make it clearer now that he's repeatedly tested his theory every which way and it's worked out each time.
Robert and Rosalind enjoying some secret downtime
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=He84jP5Nuqk
0:52, exactly the same screams in the background, in a non-IGN video, uploaded January last year.
I think this is legit, people.
I don't buy the explanation for why Elizabeth has her powers. Her getting her pinky removed was a total freak accident that I don't see being planned by Comstock. I just see it as way of illustrating to players how the multi-dimensions are bridged together. Aren't the Leuteces solely responsible for why Elizabeth has her powers? That and her being a test subject and experiment her whole life is explanation enough for me why she can open and create tears.
Thanks. It's only with the utmost respect I ask The One Who Knocks to try and tighten up his ending explanation. I know the content is correct; it's just for the sake of clarity. His theory is what made everything make sense to me, but he did so across a series of subsequent posts. So, if he's up to condensing it all in one new master post, this would be helpful.Ill hit him up about it.
WHY DOES KILLING BOOKER AT BAPTISM STOP ALL VERSIONS OF COMSTOCK?
Killing Booker before he can ever make a choice stops the Comstock as we know of him from ever happening, since he can only arise from Booker being given the choice to accept baptism or not.
In order for Elizabeth to exist, a single Booker has to be able to accept the baptism. If a single Booker accepts the baptism, no Booker accepts the baptism, because every Booker was murdered before the choice. The probability of accepting the baptism leading to a paradox is 100%. A paradox cannot happen, ever, and thus the probability of any Booker accepting the baptism is removed. Therefore, Booker rejecting the baptism becomes a constant, because if every Booker rejects the baptism, the paradox doesn't occur.
Think of it this way: If, before the game's events, Booker always rejects the baptism, what happens? Nothing, no paradox is created so every Booker lives out their lives. The ending turns this into a certainty, it erases the probability of Booker ever accepting the baptism because that leads to the paradox where every Booker died before making it.
dear god, that OP
this games plot epitomizes 'going off the deep end'. i'm surprised that people are reacting positively to it. kojima would be crucified for writing something like this
I don't buy the explanation for why Elizabeth has her powers. Her getting her pinky removed was a total freak accident that I don't see being planned by Comstock. I just see it as way of illustrating to players how the multi-dimensions are bridged together, and too further exemplify the fact that Elizabeth is Booker's daughter. Aren't the Leuteces solely responsible for why Elizabeth has her powers? That and her being a test subject and experiment her whole life is explanation enough for me why she can open and create tears.
It's probably from the Rapture edition then, like some one said? I mean the older video doesn't have it, so they must have added it. Still really cool though.
dear god, that OP
this games plot epitomizes 'going off the deep end'. i'm surprised that people are reacting positively to it. kojima would be crucified for writing something like this