The education one receives at Texas A&M is simply not comparable to actual top tier schools though.
Yeah okay, tell yourself whatever you like.
Meanwhile, reality is that in general, it's a good state school, and for some majors (like engineering, visualization, business, and agricultural studies) it is top 10-20 in the nation. So while you think it's not comparable, meanwhile my colleagues and I are going to work for Fortune 50 companies and go to top grad and professional programs in the country. I have classmates who have worked at Los Alamos, gone to Stanford Law, Harvard Medical School, gotten jobs at top companies like ExxonMobil, PwC, Deloitte, BASF, Tesla, SpaceX, PepsiCo, Ernst & Young, Disney Pixar, Electronic Arts, the list goes on and on. I consider any school that offers these opportunities to their alumni functionally a "top school."
If your definition of "top school" is exclusive to Ivy League + MIT + CalTech, then yeah I guess it's not a "top school." But that's not a useful definition because there's no evidence to support that quality of education, quality of employment/alumni network, quality of graduates is strictly divided by those lines. Many top students (like some of my friends who graduated valedictorian of their high schools) decided not to even attend those schools because of cost and distance. I think so many factors go into educational quality and student population besides just the brand name on the diploma.