HULK?
Thats because they A. want a director they can order around, and B. they already have a team for action scenes, they just need someone for the talky bits between set piece sequences. I think the days when a single director cracked the film from start to finish are pretty much over for the MCU. These things are on an assembly line at this point.Reading Tariq's bio on wiki and he seems like quite the mismatch for a big budget action flick. Same with Chloe Zhao and Eternals. They seem to want high caliber drama directors and force them into the franchise factory, like their credentials will somehow elevate low tier movies.
Bassam Tariq - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
Jessica Beil and her sexy jacked arms/body aside
Never fear, they can just throw Ana de Armas in there and all is well. She is like the MSG of the acting world
But was this a good or bad thing? Sir Connery didn't really have that dwindling twilight career so many other actors get as the need for money trumps script quality and physical decline. Granted, he has a few stinkers in his filmography already but I'd say he bowed out at about the right time lest we get Zardoz 2...
Never fear, they can just throw Ana de Armas in there and all is well. She is like the MSG of the acting world
Didn't Sean Connery turn down LOTR for League of extraordinary gentlemen? If so Connery deserved what he got with his career ending.
He turned down LOTR and Matrix Revolutions (The Architect) because he didn't understand them. That's why he did League. He quit acting because everyone making the movie was an idiot (his words) and Norrington hasn't worked since.
Yeah true,it pales in comparisson to the first two but hey in the sea of by the numbers sequels and checklist series we have nowadays even the shit of old is highly watchable.
Imagine him slapping the shit out of a raptor and then saying "Now I've told you twice!"
Disney now owns Buffy, right? Right?
