Steve Youngblood
Member
Yep, that NeoGAF guy certainly is a cynical asshole.Reznor said:Holy shit... NeoGAF hates everything.
Yep, that NeoGAF guy certainly is a cynical asshole.Reznor said:Holy shit... NeoGAF hates everything.
Reznor said:Holy shit... NeoGAF hates everything.
Drinky is the exception to the rule, though. If that type of behavior was tolerated outside of the handful of people with immunity (Astrolad, Wario64, Amir0x), it'd be annoying. It's basically become an inside joke at this point.jim-jam bongs said:Jokes aside though, I love Drinky because he's hilarious, but it's hard to enthusiastically argue in favour of threads like the "uncharted 3 is doooooooooooomed!" as much as I enjoy them personally.
iNvidious01 said:the max image size was 1100px, apart from a few low res netbooks, ancient monitors and phones it displays fine on everything
pakkit said:Drinky is the exception to the rule, though. If that type of behavior was tolerated outside of the handful of people with immunity (Astrolad, Wario64, Amir0x), it'd be annoying. It's basically become an inside joke at this point.
pakkit said:NOLF is one of my favorite all-time games, therefore I feel a strong kinship between us, brother.
m0dus said:A good example of an approach to an OT: banners and headers, with thumbnailed images as necessary. Otherwise, really, everything else should be text based and searchable.
One of these names is not like the other onespakkit said:(Astrolad, Wario64, Amir0x)
Kintaro said:BOOM done. Rules for OTs should be exactly this at maximum. Everything you need, nothing you don't. Perfection.
The Ultimate Marvel OT that just went up is like a PR booklet/website for Capcom.
pancakesandsex said:If your post on a forum needs a table of fucking contents you are doing it wrong.
Irish said:Well, he could have had it all in one post and then people would have complained because they couldn't jump straight to a certain section. Screwed both ways.
FWIW I really like that OT. I think it uses the images in a tasteful way and you keep it nice and short.ShadiWulf said:Just got done reading through this thread, a lot of useful info and tips. Helped me get ideas for next time i do a OP.
I personally don't see anything wrong with huge threads as long as they are accessible. Agreed with the fact that bodies of text on images is bad, but at the same time I can see why someone would do it from a design point of view. I did this on the story section of the Generations thread, I was trying to achieve a certain effect but it didn't even work out that well, never again!
On the Sonic Generations OT i was trying to keep the images from extending past a certain width, but the zones image for the HD version broke that limit sadly, and i didn't want to make the zone pictures any smaller then they already were. I also agree that the formatting of the thread was messed up like someone mentioned earlier in this thread, but I didn't notice until I had all the pictures uploaded... and just basically said screw it. I spent a lot of time making the thread and fixing up the images would of took even more time. I could of completely re-did the OP and fixed the issues I was having with it.. but like I said, it was a time thing.
I see making OT's as a good practice opportunity. Making graphics / layout about a game your interested in for practice? I don't think it can get much better then that.
Sonic Generations OT was the first OT I made and I plan to improve on the next OT I make based on what I have read in this topic.
Chinner said:i always find it funny when gaf critises gaming journalists when we have OT threads that are basically pure PR and we attack journalists for negatively reviewing trendy game X. so yeah huge pr ops with shit loads of pointlessly huge images are definitely terrible and bad and rubbish and other negative adjectives.
Humanity is. I wish people would stop pointing this shit out like it was some kind of revelation.Ookami-kun said:GAF has always been a melting pot of hypocrisies.
People are different. So...Yeah.Chinner said:i always find it funny when gaf critises gaming journalists when we have OT threads that are basically pure PR and we attack journalists for negatively reviewing trendy game X. so yeah huge pr ops with shit loads of pointlessly huge images are definitely terrible and bad and rubbish and other negative adjectives.
Rufus said:Threads officially started eating its own asshole.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=468217
Dat bloatness. It occupies like 85% of the first page :lol :lol :lol
Its sad when a fan puts hours and hours to an OT only to be put down because it is extremely bloated ...
It's more sad when someone thinks six posts and preposterous walls of text are needed for an OT.Its sad when a fan puts hours and hours to an OT only to be put down because it is extremely bloated ...
It's more sad when someone thinks six posts and preposterous walls of text are needed for an OT.
Its sad when a fan puts hours and hours to an OT only to be put down because it is extremely bloated ...
Its sad when a fan puts hours and hours to an OT only to be put down because it is extremely bloated ...
Walls of texts that go in depth into gameplay, weapon, and enemy mechanics?
Walls of texts that go in depth into gameplay, weapon, and enemy mechanics?
Its sad when a fan puts hours and hours to an OT only to be put down because it is extremely bloated ...
Link to it, don't post it in the thread itself.Walls of texts that go in depth into gameplay, weapon, and enemy mechanics?
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=468217
Dat bloatness. It occupies like 85% of the first page :lol :lol :lol
Walls of texts that go in depth into gameplay, weapon, and enemy mechanics?
Why does a a OT need walls of text about that? How about people just play the game and find out on their own? The discussion will eventually talk about that stuff anyway.
It's sad when someone does more marketing then the company producing the product for free.
Its sad when a fan puts hours and hours to an OT only to be put down because it is extremely bloated ...